View
5
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
MEASURING INDUSTRY
CONCENTRATION IN BRAZIL’S BEER
SECTOR - 1997-2012
Élisson Telles Moreira
(PPGE - PUCRS)
André Ricardo Stramar
(PPGA - PUCRS)
Fernando Valentim Pardo Eisele
(PPGA - PUCRS)
Helio Roberto Mathias Damiani
(PPGA - PUCRS)
Resumo Objetiva-se neste trabalho analisar o grau de concentração do setor de
cerveja do Brasil entre 1997 a 2012. Trabalha-se com medidas de
concentração para análise da competitividade do setor. Os índices
Herfindahl e Entropia de Theil indicam que essa indústria é altamente
concentrada. A indústria cervejeira do Brasil caracteriza-se por um
oligopólio altamente concentrado e a tática de competição principal é
feita por meio de marketing e diferenciação de produtos. Por fim, isto
tende a impactar negativamente na entrada de novos competidores que
queiram crescer para além de suas fronteiras e segmento de mercado.
Palavras-chaves: industrial organization, concentration indices,
oligopoly, beer industry
20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
ISSN 1984-9354
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
2
Introduction
The concern about the possibility of excessive market concentration in the beer
industry in Brazil began from the constitution of the American Beverage Company – AmBev
in 1999. The company was created from the merger of two former rivals, the brewers Brahma
and Antarctica. At the time, the economic environment of the industry, in the country and
world, was conducive to the creation of the company. After economic liberalization in Brazil,
there was a need and incentive for the formation and strengthening of large national
companies – “The Champions”.
With the globalization movement, there was an increase in international competition in
the beer market. Traditional companies such as Anheuser-Busch, USA, and Heineken,
Netherlands, went shopping in the 1990s, as a measure to reduce the exposure to their home
markets –, already saturated. Soon, mergers and acquisitions, for this industry, represent an
attitude that seeks to: (1) increase the variety of products in its portfolio with the objective of
the risk reduction in the face of consumer choice, (2) achieve economies of scale to become
more competitive compared to the rivals, and (3) go in search of the most attractive markets
that have high growth in demand for beer.
In this sector, as in many others, companies that do not enter in order to continuously
grow, certainly it will be acquired by rivals. It is observed that economic power, obtained by
merger, via associations or mergers, may bring harm or benefits to economic agents.
Regarding to the damage, it is emphasized fundamentally the unfair price increases and,
consequently, loss of social welfare due to reduced competition. With respect to the benefits
accrued, it’s examined the gains from economies of scale, increase productivity and value
creation to the organization. Thus, with this dual analysis, it can be inferred about the viability
or necessity of a larger enterprise.
The practice of anticompetitive conduct and the exercise of market power are the basis
of the analysis of antitrust regulation and policy. In Brazil, specifically, there is the Lei
8.884/94 described to regulate mergers, ex-ante and ex-post. As for the focus ex-ante, it
analyzes the behavior of the participants of the competitive process. The punishments in this
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
3
case are of order against the repressive acts that harm the competitive process. Ex-post side,
there is a standard preventative against the formation of more concentrated market structures.
Competition is a fundamental environment for the analysis of company strategy
(Schneider et al., 2009). The debate about the impacts of industrial concentration and effects
on the competitive sectors of the economy are studied by several articles. The main studies
are divided into analyzes through econometrics (Seixas, 2002; Cysne et al., 2003; Turolla et
al., 2006), concentration indices and Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) model (Oliveira
et al., 2010; Coelho Jr. et al., 2010; Ferreira; Gomes, 2006; Rocha, 2010), Porter’s Five
Forces model (Quintella; Costa, 2009; Torres; Souza, 2010, Ribeiro et al., 2010) and
computer simulations (Guerriero, 2008).
The main objective of this study is to investigate the concentration of beer industry in
Brazil from 1997 to 2012. Specific objectives were proposed: a) conduct a brief description of
the main characteristics of the sector, and b) analyze the degree of competition in the sector
via concentration indices.
The article is divided into four main sections. The first part presents the theoretical
framework. The second part presents the methodology. In the third, demonstrate the results.
Finally, the last section concludes.
Theoretical framework
Industrial Concentration in the economic literature
The type of industry that is less competitive is the monopoly: there is only one firm in
an industry. And the type of industry more competitive is the perfect competition: there are
many producers, each representing a tiny slice of the market.
Most Brazilian industries are between these two extremes, cement, banks and
supermarkets industries are examples of uncompetitive sectors (Concha-Amin; Aguiar, 2005).
There is a literature on various measures of concentration that serve to check the degree of
market competition. Therefore, more concentrated mean less competitive. Thus, a monopoly
is the market's most concentrated.
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
4
One way to measure this is to look at the market share of the four largest firms, the
CR(4) or the Herfindahl index (H). There are several other indices (Bikker; Haalf, 2002). The
importance of these indices is in its ease to capture structural aspects of the industry.
Industrial concentration, thus, is a concern for the whole society, since the degree of
concentration in a market provides an indication of the ability of the market for goods and
services to operate efficiently.
So when there is a significant concentration, monopoly power is granted to firms in
the market, and this power is often exercised with detrimental effects to consumers.
Concentration measurements are very important to consider the problems of imperfect
competition brought by oligopoly and monopoly, and by taking into account the application
of antitrust policy to encourage competition. These measures thus provide an indication of the
ability of the largest control prices and exclude competition.
In the capitalist system, a robust competition is seen as a factor that leads to
production efficiency, lower costs and lead to better products for consumers (Picard, 2009).
The imperfect competition rather unbalances the economic system and brings all the benefits
to the dominant firm, so governments usually intervene with antitrust and anti-cartel measures
when the concentration reaches high levels. The following presents the methodology of the
work.
Methodology
The present study this is an applied and exploratory research. Part is a study of the
measurements of industrial concentration – quantitative side – and describing the
characteristics of the beer industry in Brazil – a qualitative side.
It is used concentration measures to capture the degree of competition in a given
market. The higher the concentration, the lower the competition between the companies.
Thus, the different indicators consider the market shares of the agents according to different
criteria.
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
5
First, the concentration ratio of order k is classified as a partial and positive index of
concentration, i.e., it requires only information of the biggest companies in the industry and
does not use behavioral parameters. In this study, we opted for CR(4), hence, it is intended to
estimate the parameters for the four largest companies in Brazilian beer industry: AmBev,
Brasil Kirin, Heineken Brasil and Petrópolis. In that statistical inference is considered k, the
number of companies in the industry, S the total sales volume, and qi the share of sales of i-
nth company, i = (1,2,3,4, ..., n), thus:
(1)
The market share (MSi) which measures the portion attributed to the company i is
given by:
(2)
It’s observed that and . The higher the index value, the
greater the market power exercised by the k largest companies (Resende; Boff, 2002). The
mathematical formula of the concentration ratio of order 4 of the market is:
(3)
Since MSi is the total sales of the i-nth enterprise market. Now, the Herfindahl (H) is a
summary measure much used to estimate market concentrations. It is calculated by adjusting
the market share of each competing firm. The number originated of the H estimation may be
from 0.20, a perfect competition, and 0.7, a monopoly (Guidelines, 1997). Mathematically,
this ratio is expressed as follows:
(4)
This index is calculated as the sum of squares of the relative sizes of the companies
that make up the industry. It is based on the total number and size distribution of firms in an
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
6
industry. Thus, the higher the H, the higher the concentration, and thus lower the competition
between producers (Resende & Boff, 2002; Smith Jr. & Castro, 2010).
Finally, the entropy index Theil (T) is a measure indicated by Theil (1967). Emerges
from the analysis of the possibility that an event X is p. If there is confirmation of the event,
the degrees of surprise emerging vary in the opposite direction to p. Therefore, the content of
the message f(p) is inversely proportional to p. It uses a logarithmic function to describe the
process of decreasing:
(5)
T is interpreted as a measure of concentration. Be pi the participation i-nth company.
Entropy tells us that the expected value of the information content of a message that tells us
that given industry sells x amounts to a consumer, the sale was effected by the i-nth firm.
Thus, the higher the market share of the company, the lower the degree of surprise coming
from the message. T is an inverse measure of concentration. If we replace pi for the market
share of firm i, we have:
(6)
If the value obtained is close to zero, the market concentration is at maximum. Data
for the estimates are from Nielsen for the period 1997 to 2012. The reason for choosing this
time period is to capture the impact on the beer market before and after the merger Brahma-
Antarctica. The variables in question are the industry's total sales and individual sales of each
of the participating companies. Below, we analyze the results.
Results and Discussion
Brazilian beer market
The locus – product/region – is the space where the contenders are inserted, i.e., is
where the competition for market occurs. In Brazil, Pilsen is the most consumed type of beer
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
7
by Brazilians (Ferrari, 2008) –, since Brazil has a tropical climate, so there is a preference for
types of beer lighter and refreshing.
According to Nielsen Research Institute (2012), this type of beer accounts for 98% of
the Brazilian market. This beer is a clear, golden color, pleasant taste and smooth. It has low
alcohol content between 4.5% and 5.5% g.l. It uses like standard packaging, bottles with a
capacity of 600 milliliters and aluminum cans with 350 milliliters.
The Brazilian beer market is one of the strongest in the world in terms of production
growth; with particular emphasis on the Northeast region. Brazil has a population of almost
200 million inhabitants, is currently second in the world by market prospects for demand
growth (Bjørnstad; Normann, 2011). The consumption per capita is lower than many
European countries and is continually expanding. So from that point of view, it can be
inferred that the market is highly attractive to large international players.
The fastest growing segment in Brazil is of premium beers made by craft breweries,
microbreweries, and also by large companies; mostly with imported brands. In 2012, the
sector grew by about 18% (Nielsen, 2012), being the highlight of the year in the industry, with
the launch Budweiser brand in Brazil for AmBev. This new panorama of the Brazilian beer
market is due to the change in consumer preference –, since, there was an increase of income
in recent years.
The fixed costs of Brazilian breweries are high, since there are investments in plants,
equipment and employees. Because of these high fixed costs, large breweries sector seeking
to operate at full capacity to achieve economies of scale and maintain, in the case of AmBev,
a strict control of all production costs, the famous Zero Based Budgeting (ZBB) making the
EBITDA, the company’s cash flow generation, one of the largest in the beer industry
worldwide. This increases the rivalry in the sector, given that each firm seeks to produce and
sell more products and go in search of markets with high growth rates, such as the case of the
pioneering work of Schincariol brewery in the Northeast in the 1990s, where he became a
leader.
The Brasil Kirin brewery (former Schincariol), Japanese capital, was founded in 1939
in Itu-SP. It began with the manufacture of soft drinks, only in 1989 began to brew. It is the
third largest brewer in Brazil today. The production is performed in twelve plants. The
company employs about 10,000 employees. Your audience is made up of the classes "A",
"B", "C" and "D". Its main products are: Nova Schin, Glacial, Primus, Baden Baden,
Eisenbahn, Cintra and Devassa Bem Loura.
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
8
The Petrópolis brewery was founded in 1994 in the city of Petrópolis-RJ by a former
employee of the Schincariol. It is only major brewery with national capital. It is the second
largest brewer in Brazil –, position reached at the end of last year. The production is
performed in five factories. It employs around 2,500 employees. The company’s public is
formed by the classes "B", "C" and "D". She owns the following products: Itaipava, Crystal,
Petra, Lokal, Princess Black and Weltenburger Kloester (Imported).
Heineken Brasil entered in the beer business in the country in 2010 with the
acquisition of FEMSA’s beer subsidiary in Brazil, owner of Kaiser Brewery. The company
already had an agreement with the former Kaiser in the 90s; an agreement for the distribution
of the Heineken brand and a small minority stake in the company. Actually, it is the fourth
largest brewer in Brazil. The production is performed in eight factories and utilizes the
distribution system of Coca-Cola. It employees 2,300 people. The company’s public is formed
by the classes "A", "B", "C" and "D". She owns the following products: Sol, Kaiser,
Heineken, Bavaria, Xingu, Santa Cerva, Kaiser Summer Draft, Amstel Pulse and Dos Equis.
And finally AmBev was formed in 1999. It was constituted by the merger of the two
largest national breweries at the time, Brahma and Antarctica –, the Brazil’s industry
pioneers. It has more than thirty plants and an extensive distribution network throughout the
country. There are approximately 32,000 employees in Brazil. It is one of the best companies
in the world in terms of value creation. It has a strong presence in South America, Central
America and Caribbean and Canada, too. The product portfolio consists of: Antarctica,
Brahma Chopp, Skol, Bohemia, Antarctica Original, Stella Artois, Budweiser, Caracu,
Kronenbier, Serramalte, Polar Export, Leffe, Hoegaarden, Franziskaner, Patricia, Norteña,
Quilmes and Liber.
1.1.1 Analysis of complementary and substitute goods
Beer accounts for about 80% of all beverage alcohol consumed in Brazil (Camargo &
Barbosa, 2009). Other alcoholic beverages that compete with beer are wine, liquor, cachaça,
whiskey, vodka and others. Wollf (2010) found that consumer preference has, firstly, by Beer,
about 50%, followed by cachaça and then the wine. Although the beer is still the main
consumer choice, wine and liquor increased in recent years.
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
9
Some brands of beers are strategically positioned to compete directly with each other,
as is the case in Antarctica SubZero, the Kaiser and Crystal for the low segment, and Stella
Artois, Budweiser, Heineken and Eisenbahn for premium segment. Therefore, one can say that
these products are perfect substitutes. Another important strategic issue in this sector are the
“fighting brands”, i.e., the repositioning of Antarctica and Brahma brands to prevent the
growth of Nova Schin in Sao Paulo, and the launching of Brahma Fresh to the northeastern
market in order to capture the market of Nova Schin. So, this is a strategy that aims to reduce
or eliminate competition.
Breweries of all sizes are impacted by these substitutes and they need to adjust their
prices or make additional marketing efforts to give consumers additional incentive to increase
consumption of beer in face of these drinks substitutes. This tends to reduce industry
profitability. While the best beers can be repositioned at a higher level, these substitutes may
pose a threat to this segment of the beer; everything will depend on the sensitivity of the price
of consumer products. It can be inferred that good complement to the beer in Brazil is football
–, because the country has a hot climate and have tradition in soccer culture. Because of gains
in levels of consumption of wines and spirits and higher taxes on beer in 2012, the threat of
substitutes can be considered average.
1.1.2 Analysis of input suppliers
The most important inputs are imported, like hops, barley and yeast. It depends on
international commodity prices and import duties. Since corn and water abound in Brazil;
these are the basic inputs for the production of beer. The costs of producing beer in the world
based on a large brewery are divided into: packaging (28%), taxes (25%), sales and marketing
(17%), manufacturing (15%), malt (8%), hops (1%) and other ingredients (6%) (Bjørnstad;
Normann, 2011).
It is observed that the suppliers sector of aluminum cans is somewhat concentrated,
with the Crown, the Latapack-Ball, Latasa among others; unlike bottles industry, concentrated
in the company Verallia and Owen-Illinois. AmBev has a modern electronic auction system
for the purchase of their inputs –, what reduces total cost, plus the fact produce their own
caps, bottles and labels. To the Big Four, the volumes of ingredients purchased from outside
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
10
could be a threat because they can suffer with currency fluctuations or decrease in the
production of these materials in their home countries.
For barley, there are many producers in the South region. The only problem is the
unstable climate of the region which can lead to a fall in supply from one period to another.
AmBev has a control over the entire production chain, with exclusive contracts to the molds
used in the Brazilian meat industry, with factories near the barley production centers such as
malting plant in Passo Fundo-RS.
Craft breweries who buy a few ingredients and sometimes, some of them may lead to
special bargaining power for the supplier. In general, providers have limited pressure on the
price and supplier power can be considered low.
Degree of industry concentration
The process of competition in the beer market in Brazil can be divided into three
phases in a retrospective logic (see Table 1):
Phase 1 (1997 to 1999) – This period was characterized by the peak of the rivalry between
brewers Brahma, Antarctica and Kaiser. In 1998 it was the best year of Kaiser with 23%
market share. In 1999, it was announced the merger of Brahma and Antarctica, appearing
AmBev. This period was characterized by the consolidation of the Skol beer brand as the
more consumed by Brazilians.
Phase 2 (2000 to 2005) – This period was characterized by the consolidation of AmBev not
only in Brazil, but also in other countries such as Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay, Peru and
Panama. In 2004, the fact that got the greatest impact, however, it was the merger between
Belgium’s Interbrew with AmBev creating the second largest brewery in the world. Also
remarkable it was the dramatic fall in market share of Kaiser. The reason may have been the
lack of touch with the Brazilian market of the new owners, the Canadians of Molson Brazil,
who took over the company in 2002. In 2003, Schincariol launches the Nova Schin Brand and
the following year the company has its best year in its history.
Phase 3 (2006 to 2012) – This period can be characterized by the emergence of new
international players in the market. In 2006, AmBev assumes control of Cintra. There CADE
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
11
process and the company had to sell the brand to Schincariol. In 2007, FEMSA Cerveza takes
control of Molson Brazil. It launches in Brazil the Sol brand that was unsuccessful. In 2010,
Heineken bought a controlling stake in FEMSA Cerveza, and it brings together the battered
Brazilian operation. There was in 2011, a Kaiser re-branding with a new logo and formula. In
2012, Kirin Brewery of Japan takes control of Schincariol. And currently, Petrópolis brewery
has established itself as the vice leader of the industry, with the emergence of Itaipava brand.
Table 1 - Four important competitive periods for major breweries in Brazil - Market-
share (%)
Firm/Year Brahma Antarctica Petrópolis Kaiser Schincariol Cintra
1997 48,00 24,00 1,00 17,00 6,00
0,30
1998 48,00 24,00 1,50 23,00 8,00
0,50
1999 49,00 18,00 1,80 21,00 8,00
1,00
Firm/Year AmBev
Petrópolis Molson Brasil
Schincariol Cintra
2000 69,00 2,40 18,00 9,00 1,30
2001 68,00 2,30 17,00 10,00 1,20
2002 68,40 2,30 15,40 9,60 1,60
2003 67,20 3,20 13,30 11,10 1,70
2004 66,20 3,60 10,90 13,10 1,60
2005 68,30 5,20 8,90 12,60 1,40
Firm/Year AmBev
Petrópolis FEMSA Brasil
Schincariol
2006 68,40 5,70 8,50 12,70
2007 67,70 8,30 7,60 12,30
2008 68,70 8,50 8,30 11,10
2009 70,00 7,20 9,60 11,60
Firm/Year AmBev
Petrópolis
Heineken
Brasil
Brasil
Kirin
2010 68,80 9,50 8,10 12,00
2011 68,50 10,60 8,20 11,20
2012 68,50 10,80 8,50 10,60
Source: Nielsen, 2012. Author's elaboration.
Note: The colors indicate the consolidation of industry.
Table 2 analyzes the evolution of concentration indices CR(4), and Herfindahl and
Theil Entropy Index. The first index is a percentage, second and third in absolute value in
logarithms. It can analyze, primarily, through index concentration ratio, the beer market in
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
12
Brazil is highly concentrated. This can lead to a loss of competitiveness in the sector (Wood
Jr.; Caldas, 2007).
It is shown that the four largest companies control, an average of the last 15 years,
around 95% of the market in a contingent of approximately 200 breweries in Brazil (Nielsen,
2012). Ceteris paribus, a high concentration indicates a low rivalry, even though other factors
also corroborate. In the present study, we observed that the CR(4) ratio, Herdindahl and Theil
differ with regard to the degree of concentration of the brewery in Brazil for the period before
and after the creation of AmBev. The reason for the difference lies on the technical limitations
of the CR(4); since it adds only the participation of the four largest firms in the industry. Thus,
the Herfindahl synthesizes more accurately the evolution of concentration in this market.
According to the results estimated by CR(4), there was a slight decrease in
concentration in this sector. In 1997, the four largest firms had a market share of 95% and,
during the period, remained steady until reaching 98.4% in 2012. One of the causes for this
increase is the reduction of the number of competitors through mergers and acquisitions.
It is observed that from 1997 to 1999, there were two major companies in this sector.
Thus, the index captured the effects of Herfindahl shares of both companies. The Theil and
Herfindahl, for that brief period, was approximately -0.03 and 0.32. Already since 2000, the
Herfindahl index rises sharply exceeding the range of 0.50. Besanko et al. (2006) describe an
industry that has a Herfindahl index between 0.2 and 0.6 is considered an oligopoly –, that
fact is what happens in Brazil’s beer industry.
It can be inferred that the level of 0.32 between 1997 and 1999, a time before the
creation of AmBev, is close to the range of monopolistic competition, this industry has a high
concentration. In recent years, 2005 to 2012, there is a concentration process more
pronounced. Proves itself, so that AmBev has concentrated excessively the beer market in
Brazil; and as the resulting impact of this action, there is a reduction of competition. This
highly concentrated oligopoly works with differentiated products, i.e., Skol Beats, Amstel
Pulse and Kaiser Summer Draft aimed at young audiences and rave and focus on marketing
via competition. This differentiation is done by means of packages, colors, flavors and new
brands –, a decoy for the consumer.
Therefore, the largest firms not aspire to compete via price, because their ability to
compete in this way is limited –, due to the existence of perfect substitutes – which can erode
profit margins in the industry. Instead of competing on price, large firms trying to develop
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
13
brand loyalty through a massive marketing program and, in some cases, cultural adaptations,
i.e., the Polar Export brand with strong appeal to the gaucho culture in Rio Grande do Sul.
In 2011, the four largest firms in the sector spent about R$ 1.2 billion on advertising,
Petrópolis and AmBev breweries match for more than half that amount (Meio & Mensagem,
2011). The beer is highly perishable. Thus, with the competitive pressure to grow and increase
production to achieve economies of scale and thus sell the product as fast as it possible, the
rivalry within the industry rises.
Table 2 – Industry concentration of the top five breweries in Brazil (%) -
1997-2012
Firms/ Concentration
Index
Years – (%)
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Ambev
Brahma 48,0 48,0 49,0
69,0 68,0 68,4 67,2 66,2 68,3 68,4 67,7 68,7 70,0 68,8 68,5 68,5 Antarctica 24,0 18,0 18,0
Brasil Kirin* 6,0 8,0 8,0 9.0 10,0 9,6 11,1 13,1 12,6 12,7 12,3 11,1 11,6 12,0 11,2 10,6
Petrópolis 1,0 1,5 1,8 2,4 2,3 2,3 3,2 3,6 5,2 5,7 8,3 8,5 7,2 9,5 10,6 10,8
Heineken Brasil** 17,0 23,0 21,0 18,0 17,0 15,4 13,3 10,9 8,9 8,5 7,6 8,3 9,6 8,1 8,2 8,5
Cintra 0,3 0,5 1,0 1,3 1,2 1,6 1,7 1,6 1,4 1,5 - - - - - -
Others 4,0 2,5 2,2 4,0 2,5 2,7 3,5 4,6 3,6 3,2 4,1 3,4 1,6 1,6 1,5 1,6
Theil -0,05 -0,03 -0,04 -0,01 -0,02 -0,04 -0,05 -0,06 -0,05 -0,04 -0,04 -0,03 -0,01 -0,01 -0,01 -0,01
CR(4) 95,0 97,0 96,0 98,4 97,3 95,7 94,8 93,8 95,0 95,3 95,9 96,6 98,4 98,4 98,5 98,4
Herfindahl 0,32 0,32 0,32 0,51 0,50 0,50 0,48 0,46 0,49 0,49 0,48
0,49
0,51 0,50 0,49 0,49
Source: Nielsen, 2012. Author’s elaboration.
* Under the name of Primo Schincariol Brewery until 2011. ** Under the name of Cervejarias
Kaiser Brazil until 2002, Molson Brasil until 2007 and FEMSA Brasil untill 2010.
Consumers have the option of choosing other goods, such as wine, cachaça and other
spirits. Thus, switching costs are average for consumers, and again, the rivalry rises. Finally,
the exit barriers in the industry are high, due to high investment in specialized equipment, i.e.,
machinery and special kegs for microfiltration, which are characterized by being sunk costs
for the organization. So, although the rate of concentration of the industry is high, the high
fixed costs, high exit barriers, low switching costs along with the perishable nature of the
product, makes the rivalry in the industry high.
Investment in equipment, pavilions, ingredients, recipes and resources to produce a
plant six to eight million hectoliters per year is at least R$ 600 million (Camarotto, 2012).
Still, this does not result in a significant barrier due to tax incentives of states and niche
strategies of competitors. The differential of the beer industry in Brazil is the way the product
is distributed, the speed and scope –, thus, a good location and logistics system are key factors
for increasing profitability.
Once a new plant is built, it will have a few additional uses –, there is the possibility of
joint production of soft drinks in some plants, what can bring economies of scope. And as the
concentration ratio of the industry is high, firms have substantial financial resources to invest
in marketing, acquisitions or otherwise discouraging potential entrants. Thus, the barriers to
entry in this industry are high for a major operation and a strategy of regional or national
scope.
Now the entrance with a niche strategy is relatively easy. Just have the entrepreneurial
attitude, knowledge of the processes of brewing and between R$ 200,000 to R$ 5 million
available for investment (Zuini, 2011). This is evidenced by the appearance of over 200 craft
breweries in the last 10 years. The microbreweries are supported by loyal local consumers.
They offer a product with unique taste and aroma, which is characterized as a differential in
these companies. Consumers have responded well to this type of craft beer and the industry
has grown steadily. However, large firms, which have substantial resources, have contributed
to discourage the entry of new breweries that have big ambitions.
Overall, the attractiveness of the sector depends on a good strategic planning for those
who decide to enter. A great opportunity to enter the sector by major international player it
would be by the acquisition of Petrópolis. One reason is the high per capita consumption
growth of the Brazilian market and, on the other hand, it is the only brewery that is not tied to
a giant with global operations.
Investments in equipment, pavilions, inputs and processes are a major barrier to entry
in the category of large breweries. While this segment of the industry obtains high levels of
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
16
sales and profits, the high concentration of the four largest firms in the industry makes this
segment unattractive to an investor with limited resources.
However, this is different for the group of small breweries and microbreweries acting
such as regional Belco, Krill, Conti and Malta, at Sao Paulo state, Cerpa, at Pará state, Frevo,
at Pernambuco state, Colonia, at Paraná state, Kilsen, at Santa Catarina state and Dado Bier,
of Rio Grande do Sul. A low amount of investment is sufficient for entry.
And as the demand in the premium segment in Brazil is high, combined with changing
tastes and increased consumer income, it tends to have higher profit margins. The act of
producing a local or regional becomes dependent on the creation of an identity, a brand. It is
difficult to build loyalty in this segment as many consumers of class "A" and "B" would rather
try several craft brands. However, with the growth of craft breweries and industry evolution,
brand loyalty can come to develop and take root in the mind of the consumer.
The economy of scale achieved due to huge production capacity ensures the majors
the possibility of obtaining high profit margins, these companies can invest in new plants and
equipment, invest heavily in marketing or even acquire small, as in the case of the brewery
Eisenbahn of Santa Catarina, São Paulo's Baden Baden, the Nobel’s Pernambuco and Rio’s
Devassa, purchased by Schincariol between 2007 and 2010 – a clear change of strategy of the
Itu’s based brewery, in search of higher margins and market diversification. Therefore, small
breweries with their scarce resources cannot afford to make such expenditures.
1.1.3 Analysis the actions of the government in the industry
Taxes account for 55.6% of the final price of beer in Brazil (IBPT, 2012). This can
lead to reduced investment by breweries and fall in consumption by consumers. A tax
differentiation in favor of microbreweries could give a new contouring on the competitiveness
of the sector for the coming years.
These companies operate with a minimum scale and higher cost compared to majors
of the industry. While they use 80% malt, the majors use only 20%, a fact that tends to raise
its costs. And the legislation also allows the use of corn, the limit is 45%, but most large
breweries goes beyond this value in order to reduce costs (Mardengan et al., 2013). The
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
17
microbreweries follow the German Purity Law, what guarantees them top quality, but with a
higher cost.
There is still much room to grow, just see that in England the premium beer market
accounts for 45% of the sector (Bjørnstad; Normann, 2011). Another point against for craft
breweries was the Lei Seca –, a law that it was implemented by the Brazilian government to
deter the consumption of alcohol by drivers. This is likely to have a greater impact on these
companies. Thus, they should be treated differently in one way that encourages sustainable
development.
The regulations should be more severe. As noted the government was conniving with
the formation of a major player in Brazil, what increased market concentration. The tax issue
may have weighed in favor because a larger company tends to generate more taxes. The fact
that the incentive to create major trusts in recent years, clearly favored by the BNDES, at the
financial side, and CADE, at law side, has been a problem in Brazil. This all leads to the
reduction of the welfare of the market, because it creates a highly concentrated sector, with
the possibility of formation cartels with direct negative effects on the consumer.
Conclusion
This article sought to highlight the industry concentration of beer market in Brazil.
The results indicate a highly concentrated market power in the four firms with a Herfindahl
index of about 0.50. Estimates point to a more concentrated market in the period following the
creation of AmBev.
The industry leader has applied tactics that aim to stop or hinder the entry of new
competitors. Even being a company with almost 70% of the market, AmBev made the
purchase of the brewery Cintra in 2007, where the biggest interest was in just the pavilions
and equipment. Another method is to introduce a package of 630 milliliters, for Skol in Rio de
Janeiro, and Bohemia, in Rio Grande do Sul, suspended in 2010 by determination of CADE.
In 2003 the program was instituted “Tô Contigo” (I'm with You) which aimed to loyal the
points of sale through advantages. This led to the exclusivity of the AmBev’s brand portfolio
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
18
and limited the sale of competitors' brands. In the end, the company took a big fine and the
program was suspended.
One caveat may be placed with the formation of the Associação Brasileira da Indústria
da Cerveja (Brazilian Beer Industry Association) – CervBrasil – in 2012, with the
participation of only four major of the beer industry. This movement aims to protect the
interests of big breweries and disseminate some information. But one question remains: to
what extent this association will not become over the next few years in a cartel? Why were
not invited the other competitors in the market for this association?
The limitations to the study are the small amount of disaggregated data about
breweries, brands of products, markets and distribution systems. It was used for this article
data from Nielsen Research Institute released into the area of academic study.
It is noted that the disaggregated data by beer brands and monthly Brazilian states are
not available to everyone. Alternatively, it is suggested for future work, a more detailed
analysis about the industry concentration. Therefore, it should include the impact of
transaction costs, innovations, economies of scale and scope and product differentiation in
details and regional issues that affect consumer preference.
References
BESANKO, D; DRANOVE, D; SHANLEY M; Schaeffer, S. Economia da estratégia (3a
ed.). Porto Alegre, RS: Bookman, 2006.
BJØRNSTAD, J. Ø; NORMANN, C.A. Beer industry global analisys, study of big four
companies (ABInbev, SABMiller, Heineken & Calrsberg). 2011. Acesso em: 5 fev. 2013.
Disponível em: <http://www.slideshare.net/cadeler/beer-industry>.
CAMARGOS, M.A; BARBOSA, F.V. Fusões e aquisições de empresas brasileiras: criação
de valor e sinergias operacionais. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 49(2), 206-220,
2009. doi: 10.1590/S0034-75902009000200007
CAMAROTTO, M. Petrópolis investe R$ 1,8 bi no Nordeste para desbancar a Schin.
2012. Acesso em: 9 fev. 2013. Disponível em:
<http://www.valor.com.br/empresas/2802790/petropolis-investe-r-18-bi-no-nordeste-para-
desbancar-schin>.
COELHO Jr., L.M; REZENDE, J.L.P; ÁVILA, E.S; OLIVEIRA, A.D; BOERGES, L.A.C.
Analysis of the brazilian celulose industry concentration (1998-2007). Revista Cerne, 16(2),
209-216, 2010.
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
19
CONCHA-AMIN, M.; AGUIAR, D.R.D. Concentração industrial, fusões e turnover no setor
de supermercados brasileiro. Gestão & Produção, v.13, n.1, p.45-56, jan-abr-2006.
CYSNE, R.P; ISSLER, J.V; WYLLIE, R; Resende, M. Demanda por cerveja no Brasil: um
estudo econométrico. Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico, 31(2), 249-268, 2003.
FERRARI, V. Mercado de cervejas no Brasil. Dissertação de Mestrado, 2008, Pontifícia
Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul – PUCRS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
FERREIRA, S.J; GOMES, M.F.M. Ajustamentos nas agroindústrias de biscoitos e massas
alimentícias no Brasil, 1995-2002. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 44(1), 79-97,
2006. doi: 10.1590/S0103-20032006000100004.
GUERRIERO, I.R. Uso de modelos de simulação de fusões horizontais na análise antitruste:
revisitando o caso AmBev. Anais do XXXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia, Ingá
Niterói, RJ, Brasil, 2008.
GUIDELINES. Horizontal merger guidelines do U. S. Department of Justice & Federal
Trade Commission. 1997. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2013. Disponível em:
<http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/horiz_book/hmg1.html>.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE PLANEJAMENTO TRIBUTÁRIO. Peso dos tributos nas
festas de fim de ano pode chegar a 59%. 2012. Acesso em: 5 fev. 2013. Disponível em:
<http://www.ibpt.com.br/noticia/116/Peso-dos-tributos-nas-festas-de-final-de-ano-pode-
chegar-a-59>.
MARDEGAN, S.F; ANDRADE, T.M.B; SOUZA NETO, H.R; VASCONCELLOS, E.B.C;
MARTINS, L.F.B; MENDONÇA, T.G; MARTINELLI, L.A. Stable carbon isotopic
composition of brazilian beers – a comparison between large-and small-scale breweries.
Journal of Food and Composition Analisys, 29(1), 52-57, 2013. doi:
10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.031.
MEIO&MENSAGEM. Maiores anunciantes 2011. 2012. Acesso em: 3 fev. 2013 Disponível
em: <http://www.meioemensagem.com.br/home/indicadores/2012/05/28/Maiores-
anunciantes-2011/fileBinary/MM%20Especial%20A&A%20300maiores.pdf>.
NIELSEN. Kit para a imprensa e universidades. 2012. Acesso em: 4 fev. 2013. Disponível
em: <http://br.nielsen.com/press/index.shtml>.
OLIVEIRA, O.V; FORTE, S.H.A.C; ARAGÃO, L.A. Fusões e aquisições sob a perspectiva
da vantagem competitiva: o caso da Perdigão Agroindustrial S.A. RGBN, 9(24), 91-108,
2007.
PICARD, R.G. Measures of concentration in the daily newspaper industry. Journal of Media
Economics, Vol. 1, Issue 1, 1988, pp. 61-74, 2009.
QUINTELLA, R.H; COSTA, M.A. O setor de telefonia móvel do Brasil após o SMP: as
estratégias das operadoras de telefonia e a convergência fixa-móvel. Revista de
Administração Pública, 43(1), 123-150, 2009. doi: 10.1590/S0034-76122009000100007.
RESENDE, M; BOFF, L. Concentração Industrial. In: Kupfer, D., & Hasenclever, L. (Orgs.).
Economia Industrial: Fundamentos teóricos e práticas no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Elsevier
Editora, 2002.
RIBEIRO, R; GARCIA, M.M; CASAS, A.L.L. Estratégia e vantagem competitiva no
mercado brasileiro de telecomunicações: um estudo de casos múltiplos para o período de 1999
a 2007. Revista de Gestão, 17(3), 297-312, 2010.
ROCHA, F. Dinâmica da concentração de mercado na indústria brasileira, 1996-2003.
Economia e Sociedade, 19(3), 477-498, 2010. doi: 10.1590/S0104-06182010000300003
SEIXAS, R.N.L. Diferenciação de produtos e concentração: um estudo sobre a indústria
cervejeira no Brasil. Dissertação de Mestrado, 2002, Universidade Estadual de Campinas
UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
IX CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE EXCELÊNCIA EM GESTÃO 20, 21 e 22 de junho de 2013
20
SCHNEIDER, A.B; CARNEIRO, M.L; SERRA, F.A.R, Ferreira, M.P. Estratégia
competitiva: Michael Porter 30 anos depois. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 2(2), 298-
326, 2009.
SIQUEIRA, P.H.L; CASTRO Jr., L.G. Fusões e aquisições das unidades produtivas e da
agroindústria de cana-de-açúcar no Brasil e nas distribuidoras de álcool hidratado etílico.
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 48(4), 709-735, 2010. doi: 10.1590/S0103-
20032010000400009
THEIL, H. Economics and information theory. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1967.
TORRES, R.P; SOUZA, M.A.F. A dinâmica do mercado farmacêutico segundo o modelo de
estratégias de Porter. Sociedade, Contabilidade e Gestão, 5(3), 2010.
TUROLLA, F.A; LOVADINE, D; OLIVEIRA, A.V.M. Competição, colusão e antitruste:
Estimação da conduta competitiva de companhias aéreas. Revista Brasileira de Economia,
60(4), 425-459, 2006. doi: 10.1590/S0034-71402006000400006
WOOD Jr. T.; CALDAS, M.P. Empresas brasileiras e o desafio da competitividade. Revista
brasileira de Administração, 47(3), 1-13, 2007. doi: 10.1590/S0034-75902007000300006
WOLLF, A.J. Como marca, o comportamento do consumidor e o preço influenciam a
participação de mercado; um estudo sobre o mercado de cerveja. Dissertação de
Mestrado, 2010, Instituto de Pesquisa e Ensino – INSPER, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
ZUINI, P. Bamberg: o desafio de ser microcervejeiro no Brasil. 2011. Acesso em 4 fev.
2013. Disponível em: <http://exame.abril.com.br/pme/noticias/o-desafio-de-ser-
microcervejeiro-no-brasil>.
Recommended