0049-1748_12_1_L28 Suponho que seja a citação 12 do wood

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 0049-1748_12_1_L28 Suponho que seja a citao 12 do wood

    1/4

    Stimulated Raman scattering in a field of ultrashort light pulses

    This article has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text article.

    1982 Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 12 98

    (http://iopscience.iop.org/0049-1748/12/1/L28)

    Download details:

    IP Address: 200.137.221.198

    The article was downloaded on 04/01/2012 at 18:56

    Please note that terms and conditions apply.

    View the table of contents for this issue, or go to thejournal homepage for more

    me Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience

    http://iopscience.iop.org/page/termshttp://iopscience.iop.org/0049-1748/12/1http://iopscience.iop.org/0049-1748http://iopscience.iop.org/http://iopscience.iop.org/searchhttp://iopscience.iop.org/collectionshttp://iopscience.iop.org/journalshttp://iopscience.iop.org/page/aboutioppublishinghttp://iopscience.iop.org/contacthttp://iopscience.iop.org/myiopsciencehttp://iopscience.iop.org/myiopsciencehttp://iopscience.iop.org/contacthttp://iopscience.iop.org/page/aboutioppublishinghttp://iopscience.iop.org/journalshttp://iopscience.iop.org/collectionshttp://iopscience.iop.org/searchhttp://iopscience.iop.org/http://iopscience.iop.org/0049-1748http://iopscience.iop.org/0049-1748/12/1http://iopscience.iop.org/page/terms
  • 8/3/2019 0049-1748_12_1_L28 Suponho que seja a citao 12 do wood

    2/4

    S t i m u l a t e d R a m a n s c a t t e r i n g in a f i e l d of u l t r a sh o r t l i g h tp u l s e sV. A. Gorbunov(Submitted February 16, 1981)Kvantovaya Elektron. (Moscow)9,152-155(January 1982)Numerical methods are used to study the evolution of ultrashort light pulses of arbitrary intensity in the caseof concurrent stimulated Raman scattering in a dispersion-free medium. It is shown that a characteristicfeature of transient stimulated Raman scattering is a strong amplitude and phase modulation of the pumppulse resulting from a periodic reversal of the direction of energy transfer between the pump and Stokeswaves.This lowers the efficiency of conversion to the Stokescomponent.PACS numbers: 42.65.Cq

    1. A theory of transient stimulated Raman scatter inghas been developed in detail for the linear case, whenth e pump field is assumed to be constant and thechanges in the level populat ions of a substance are ig-nored. This theory deals with transient effects as-sociated with the inertia of the nonlinear polarizationof the medium1 and with the difference between thegroup velocit ies of the pump and Stokes pulses. 2 Thepossibility of self- induced t ransparen cy in stimulatedRaman scatt erin g (STRS) has been investigated in thenonlinear case. Steady-state scatt ering regimes havebeen predicted theoretically for high- intensity fields ofultrashort pulses altering greatly the level populations(STRS solitons).3 However, further studies are neededof the possibility of formation of such steady- statepulses in real system s.

    T h e present paper gives a numerical analysis of thesolution of the equations describing the STRS process.We wish to draw attent ion to a charact eristic effect ofa n amplitude and phase modulation of ultrashort pumppulses in the process of scat tering when an allowanceis made for the reaction of the Stokes on the pumpwave. This modulation affects pulses of moderateintensity12 as well as high- power pulses3 if their shapediffers greatly from that of a soliton corresponding to agiven dispersion of the medium. This modulation isdu e to the influence on the scat ter ing pr ocess of thedifference between the phases of the pump, Stokes, andcoherent polarization waves, which change as a resultof changes in the amplitudes of these waves. Similarbehavior of the phase difference between the waves isknown to play an important ro le in resonant four-waveparamet ric interactions in steady- state theory ofSTRS.4"6 The modulation appears most clearly in thecase discussed below when the scattering is concurrentan d there is no group delay of the pump and Stokeswaves. This situation is normal in the case of STRSin gases. The results of numerical calculations forth e countercu rren t STRS (see Fig. 3 in Ref. 7) can alsobe regarded as a manifestation of such modulation.

    2. We shall assume that the scatt erin g occurs onon e pair of levels of scattering molecules and we shallconsider the one- dimensional problem. The evolutionof the pump and Stokes pulses is described by a systemof equations consisting of the reduced Maxwell equa-tions for the pulse envelopes and the equations of mo-tion for the slow amplitude of a nondiagonal element

    of the density mat rix and for the population difference . In the resonance approximation when - , = 21+ ( , are the frequencies of the pump and Stokesfields, respectively; 21 is the frequency of the in-vestigated transit ion; is the detuning from resonance) ,this system is of the form (see, for example, Ref. 8)

    das

    cuts s sin ( );

    = 5 sin ( ) ;

    ~ p - - j - s = Con paj sin ( ) ;

    - + ' / = Coapc, s sin ( - ).

    (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)

    T he equations are given in the real form. Here,at,,M>i)=Attt{ ,t)/AP(/ni are the dimensionless realamplitudes of the pump and Stokes waves; = - $ isth e difference between their phases; A

    pmaiis the max-

    imum amplitude of the pump pulse at the entry to theinvestigated medium; t,=z/lt is the dimensionlesslength; 1~ = 2 ( 3/ ,) ; = 3/ ( , ); nps are therefractive indices at the frequencies ,\ is the den-sity of the scattering molecules; is the matrix e le-ment of the scatter ing process; s and are the realamplitude and phase [a=s ( )]; 0 is the equi-librium value of the population difference ; = (t - z/c)/T2 is the dimensionless time; 0 = 2 ; = 1/ 2;T l and 2 are the longitudinal and tr ansverse relaxationtimes of the medium; C o= ^ n^ V* As mentionedear lier , we shall consider the concurrent scatteringan d ignore the group delay of the waves.

    T h e essence of the effect can be explained by the fol-lowing qualitative considerat ions. Let us assume thatth e pump and Stokes pulses at the entry (at = 0) arefree of phase modulation [(3 0/ 9) {.o = O] and that theirduration is ,

  • 8/3/2019 0049-1748_12_1_L28 Suponho que seja a citao 12 do wood

    3/4

    The total overlap integral () = Co / . apa, sin(0 - ) 'will be called the area under a pulse.We shall now consider changes in the phase shift on

    increase in (during propagation) at some fixed point 0 of a time profile of a pulse. It follows from Eq. (2)t h a t if { / \ = ,then changes so that the phaseshift becomes - /2 in the limit ap>V~aas, whichcorresponds to the transfer of energy from the pump toth e Stokes wave. For the opposite relationship betweenth e amplitudes (ap

  • 8/3/2019 0049-1748_12_1_L28 Suponho que seja a citao 12 do wood

    4/4

    th e pulse power but the one- dimensional approximationc o n d i t i o n s must be satisfied over distances of a fewlengths L t.Th e growth of regula r modulation of the pump pulsemay be disturbed by the transfer of energy to the an ti-Stokes and higher Stokes components which are ignored

    in our analysis. Special calculations allowing for thepresence of the pump and Stokes components and oneo t h e r component (for example, anti- Stokes) showedt h a t parametric energy transfer to higher componentsis slight if = / 1 l,whereltm=2ir/Ak is the lengthof the linear phase matching of the waves; A = 2kp - k t- k s is the difference between the wave vectors. Wecan thus see that the above analysis is valid if lt/ lpm * 1(in the case of pulses of different initial area whenL l/ lpm^ 1). In the example of hydrogen we have elO"2;th e value of can be increased by employing a mixtureof hydrogen with a buffer gas, as has been done inRef. 6. Then, the value of le is governed by the partialpr essur e of the Raman - active hydrogen and lm isgoverned by the total pressure in the mixture.

    Th e auth or is grateful to G. N. Vinokurov and S. B.P a p e r n y i for valuable discussions.

    *S . A. Akhmanov, . . D rabovich, A. P. Sukhorukov, andA. S. Ch i rk i n , Zh. Eksp. T e o r . Fiz. 59, 485 (1970) [Sov.Phys . J E T P 3 2 , 266 (1971)].2S . A. Akhmanov, . . D rabovich, A. P. Sukhorukov, andA. K. Shchednova, Zh. Ek s p . Te o r . Fiz. 62, 525 (1972)[Sov. Phys . J E T P 3 5 , 279(1972)] .3 T . M. M akhviladze and . . Sary chev , Zh. Ek s p . Te o r .F i z . 71, 896 (1976) [Sov. Phys . J E T P 44, 471 (1976)].4V. S. Butylkin, G. V. Venkin, V. P. P ro t a s o v , P. S. F i s h e r ,Yu. G. Khronopulo , and M. F . Shalyaev, Zh. Ek s p . Te o r .Fiz . 70, 829 (1976) [Sov. Phys . J E T P 4 3 ,4 3 0 (1976)].5V. S. Butylkin, G. V. Venkin, L. L. Kulyuk, D. I. M aleev ,Yu. G. Khronopulo , and M. F . Shalyaev, Kvantovaya Elek-t r o n . (M oscow) 4, 1537 (1977) [Sov. J. Quantum E l e c t r o n . 7,867 (1977)].6V. A. G orbunov, K. Sh. Must aev , S. B. Papernyi , and V. A.Sereb ry akov , P i s ' m a Zh. Te k h . F iz. 5, 1244 (1979) [Sov.Tech. Phys . Le t t . 5, 522 (1979)].7S . F. Mo ro z o v , L. V. Piskunova, . . Sushchik, and G. 1.F r e i d m a n , Kvantovaya Ele k t ro n . (Moscow) 5, 1005 (1978)[Sov. J . Quantum E l e c t r o n . 8, 576 (1978)].8 I . A. Poluektov, Yu. M. Popov, and V. S. Roi tberg , Kvanto -vaya Ele k t ro n . (M oscow) 4, 651 (1977) [Sov. J. QuantumEle c t ro n . 7, 362 (1977)].

    Tra n s la t e d by A. Tybulewicz

    N e e d to a l l ow for slow n o n l i n e a r i t y in m e a s u r e m e n t s of n.R. A. Garaev, D. V. Vlasov, and V. V. KorobkinP. N. Lebedev Physics Institute, Academy of Sciences of the USSR , Moscow( S u b m i t t e d Ma rch 17, 1981Kvantovaya Elektron. (Moscow) 9, 155- 157 (Jan uary 1982)T he componen ts of the no nlinear susceptibility tensor ^ S , were determ ined by a method eliminating theco n t r i b u t i o n of the slow part of the nonlinearity. A comparison with an interferometric method made itpossible to demo nstra te a considerable contribut ion of the slow part of the non linearity in the measurementsof j under conditions of har d focusing of radiation in a sample. This comparison also showed t h a t allowancefor the slow part of the nonlinearity is essential in calorimetric measurements of 2 in the case of pulsed u r a t i o n s typical of - switching conditions.PACS num bers: 42.55.Bi

    The exact knowledge of the nonlinear refractive indexw2 of an active medium is essential in the developmentof high- power laser s for scientific r esearch and pract i-cal applica tions. Measurem ent s of this refract ive in-dex have been made on many occasions, 1"3 but to thebest of our knowledge the problem of separate deter-m i n a t i o n of the fast and slow parts of n2 has not beendiscussed in the lit erat ur e. It should be pointed outt h a t the fast (electronic and electron - nuc lear) and slow( t h e r m a l and strict ion) pa rt s may generally have dif-ferent signs and their contribution to n2 depends on thea c t u a l case. The time to establish the slow part of then o n l i n e a r i t y depends on the structure and dimensionsof a beam.

    Th e characteristic time for the establishment of theslow part , = l/ v is governed by the characteristic

    size / of the tr an sverse struc tu re of the beam and byth e velocity of sound v. We shall consider the specificcase of the time needed for the establishment of theslow pa rt when radiation is focused in a sample in aspot of ~100 size. If = 5 5 cm/ sec, we obtain , 20 nsec. This simple estima te shows that even inth e case of relatively shor t laser pulses the influenceof the slow nonlinearity may be considerable.

    We shall consider not only the results of determina-t ion of the component ^ by eliminating the contribu-t ion of the slow part , butfor the sake of comparisonwe shall show oscillogram s obtained in the course ofth e determination of xJJ^ by an interferometric method,which demonstrate clearly the importance of the con-t r i b u t i o n of slow nonlinearity.

    The values of an d were measured using the10 0 Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 12(1), Jan. 1982 0049-1748/82/010100-03$04.10 1982 American Institute of Physics 10 0