Upload
doanbao
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Instituto de Ciências Biológicas
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo
de Vida Silvestre
Comportamento de larvas de Phylloicus sp. (Trichoptera,
Calamoceratidae): um fragmentador característico
de córregos neotropicais
Tese apresentada à Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, como pré-requisito do Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo de Vida Silvestre, para a obtenção do título de Doutor em Ecologia.
Marcelo da Silva Moretti
Orientador:
Prof. Dr. Marcos Callisto
(Departamento de Biologia Geral, ICB, UFMG)
Co-orientador:
Prof. Dr. Mark O. Gessner
(Departamento de Ecologia Aquática, Eawag)
Belo Horizonte, setembro de 2009.
Instituto de Ciências Biológicas
Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo
de Vida Silvestre
Tese de Doutorado
Comportamento de larvas de Phylloicus sp. (Trichoptera,
Calamoceratidae): um fragmentador característico
de córregos neotropicais
Marcelo da Silva Moretti
Orientador:
Prof. Dr. Marcos Callisto
(Departamento de Biologia Geral, ICB, UFMG)
Co-orientador:
Prof. Dr. Mark O. Gessner
(Departamento de Ecologia Aquática, Eawag)
Belo Horizonte, setembro de 2009.
Bolsas:
Financiamento:
Apoio:
Aos meus pais e à Mica por todo amor e
carinho durante esta caminhada.
“The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot
possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it
usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair.”
Douglas Adams
V
Agradecimentos
Após diversas idas ao campo, longos dias no laboratório, milhares de discos
de folhas cortados, centenas de fragmentadores “assados”, duas travessias de oceano,
alguns quilinhos a mais e outros fios de cabelo a menos, chegou o momento de
lembrar de todos aqueles que em algum ou em vários momentos estiveram presentes
na minha vida nos últimos 4 anos e me ajudaram a tornar esta tese em uma realidade.
Ao meu Orientador
Ao Prof. Marcos Callisto por ter me orientado também no doutorado e ter
permitido que eu me aventurasse por caminhos que ainda não haviam sido percorridos
dentro do nosso laboratório. Marcos, obrigado pelo apoio, orientação e ensinamentos
durante os últimos 10 anos!
To my Co-supervisor
To Prof. Mark Gessner who kindly accepted me in his research group during
my stay at Eawag. I will always be grateful for his teachings, conversations, advices
and opportunities. Mark, thank you for showing me that a good experiment starts with
a good planning and as much replication as possible!
Aos meus colegas de Laboratório
À Barbara Becker por ter acreditado sempre nas minhas idéias e ter
participado em todos os experimentos desta tese, e à Nayara Costa pela imensa ajuda
e apoio na reta final. Meninas, a disponibilidade de vocês foi fundamental para que
minhas idéias saíssem do papel!
Ao Prof. José Francisco Gonçalves (Júnior) por desde o início ter me
incentivado a trabalhar com decomposição, e à Profa. Adriana Medeiros que elaborou
e executou comigo vários experimentos, sempre acreditando nos hifomicetos do
córrego Garcia. A vocês dois sou imensamente grato pela amizade e conversas
científicas.
À Juliana França, Déborah Oliveira, Clarissa Dantas, Adriana Lessa, Ana
Paula Eller e Lurdemar Tavares pelo apoio nas idas ao campo, ajuda no laboratório,
análises de nutrientes, compras de material e fotografias das larvas. À velha guarda do
VI
laboratório (Raphael Ligeiro, Wander Ribeiro, Pablo Moreno, Augusto Mendes, Ivan
Monteiro e Aline Paz) pela amizade, conversas, trocas de idéias e ajuda no campo. Ao
Seu Jorge (COPASA) por facilitar as coletas, vigiar os experimentos de campo e pelas
boas conversas. Aos novos colegas de laboratório e ao pessoal do Nuvelhas (Cacá,
Diego e turma do Geoprocessamento) pelo ótimo convívio e boas risadas!
To my friends from Eawag
To Maria Alp, Vicenç Acunã, André Barbosa, Aline Frossard, Andreas
Bruder, Diego Tonolla, and Chris Robinson for their friendship. These “gorgeous”
friends were responsible for several special and unforgettable moments during my
time in Switzerland. Thank you guys for taking care of this “meat addicted,
Gammarus killer, hobo, crazy Brazilian” while he was far away from home!
Aos que fazem parte da minha vida
A Deus pela força e clareza nos pensamentos, principalmente nos momentos
mais difíceis. Aos meus colegas de graduação (Trilobitas) pela amizade, passeios,
festas e apoio durante todos esses anos. À Britney, por sempre me considerar o
melhor dono do mundo, mesmo estando a maior parte do tempo ausente. À minha
família pelo carinho e aos meus pais pelo amor, paciência e dedicação. À Michelle
que sempre esteve ao meu lado, sendo minha amiga, companheira e confidente
mesmo quando distante. Mica, obrigado pelo seu amor e por tudo o que você sempre
faz por mim! Sem vocês, eu não teria chegado até aqui!
A todos vocês e a alguém que eventualmente eu possa ter esquecido, MUITO
OBRIGADO!!!
VII
Sumário
Resumo 1
Abstract 4
Apresentação 6
ObjetivoseHipóteses 8
ÁreasdeEstudo 9
Capítulo1 10
Leaf abundance and phenolic concentrations codetermine theselection of casebuilding materials by Phylloicus sp.(Trichoptera,Calamoceratidae)
Capítulo2 25
LengthdrymassrelationshipsforatypicalshredderinBrazilianstreams(Trichoptera,Calamoceratidae)
Capítulo3 36
AreexoticEucalyptusleavesabetterfoodresourcetoPhylloicussp. (Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae) in Brazilian Cerradostreams?
Capítulo4 55
Influenceoflowqualityleavesonthefeedingactivityoftropicalandtemperateshredders
Conclusões 74
ConsideraçõesFinaisePerspectivasFuturas 75
Referências 77
1
Resumo
O objetivo geral desta tese foi avaliar o comportamento de Phylloicus sp.
(Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae) quando exposto a detritos foliares de diferentes
qualidades nutricionais e dureza. Três hipóteses direcionaram os experimentos aqui
apresentados: (1) as larvas de Phylloicus selecionam espécies de folhas para construir
um casulo mais resistente; (2) as folhas de Eucalyptus são preferidas e promovem um
maior crescimento e sobrevivência das larvas de Phylloicus do que as folhas do
Cerrado, com baixa qualidade nutricional; e (3) a atividade dos invertebrados
fragmentadores nos córregos do Cerrado é limitada pela qualidade das folhas
disponíveis. Esta tese é composta de 4 capítulos referentes a experimentos de
laboratório e campo realizados com invertebrados fragmentadores coletados em um
córrego tropical no Brasil e um de região temperada na Suíça.
O Capítulo 1 refere-se a um experimento elaborado para se avaliar o
comportamento de construção de casulos de larvas de Phylloicus quando expostas a
diferentes espécies de folhas. Os principais resultados foram: (a) Eucalyptus e Myrcia
foram mais utilizadas (36,4 e 35,7%) que Protium (20,0%) para a construção de
casulos, enquanto Miconia foi utilizada em uma proporção intermediária (28,6%); e
(b) a seleção de folhas para a construção de casulos foi recurso denso-dependente e as
larvas utilizaram preferencialmente folhas com maiores concentrações de fenóis,
independentemente da dureza e da razão biomassa : área. Foi possível concluir que as
larvas de Phylloicus apresentam ampla plasticidade no comportamento de construção
de casulos e sua preferência foi determinada pela composição química e
disponibilidade das folhas.
O Capítulo 2 refere-se a um trabalho desenvolvido para se determinar qual
medida corporal e qual função matemática poderiam ser utilizadas para melhor
descrever a relação comprimento-biomassa da população de Phylloicus estudada. O
comprimento corporal proporcionou as melhores equações para se estimar a biomassa
das larvas, seguido pela largura da cápsula cefálica e distância interocular, e os
maiores coeficientes de determinação foram encontrados utilizando-se os modelos
potencial e exponencial. Desta forma, concluiu-se que as relações comprimento-
biomassa descritas foram significativas e podem ser utilizadas em experimentos de
2
laboratório que avaliem, por exemplo, as taxas de crescimento e a produção
secundária de larvas de Phylloicus sp.
O Capítulo 3 refere-se a experimentos de laboratório e campo elaborados para
se determinar a preferência alimentar, taxas de crescimento e sobrevivência das larvas
de Phylloicus sp. alimentando-se de folhas de Eucalyptus camaldulensis e de 3
espécies nativas do Cerrado de Minas Gerais (Myrcia guyanensis, Miconia chartacea
e Protium brasiliense). Os principais resultados foram: (a) Eucalyptus foi mais
consumida que Myrcia (0,436 e 0,209 mg mg-1 dia-1) nos experimentos de preferência
alimentar, enquanto Miconia foi consumida em taxas intermediárias (0,230 mg mg-1
dia-1) e Protium não foi consumida; (b) as taxas de crescimento diário de Phylloicus
variaram de 0,08 a 0,14 mg dia-1 e não foram encontradas diferenças entre os
tratamentos alimentares; (c) a sobrevivência das larvas que se alimentaram de
Eucalyptus (68%) e Miconia (64%) foi significativamente maior das que se
alimentaram de Myrcia (50%) e Protium (32%). Foi possível concluir que o
comportamento alimentar de Phylloicus foi mais influenciado pela qualidade das
folhas disponíveis do que sua origem (nativas/exóticas) e as folhas de Eucalyptus não
constituíram um recurso alimentar de maior valor nutricional para as larvas de
Phylloicus do que as folhas de espécies do Cerrado.
No Capítulo 4 foram comparados a preferência alimentar, o consumo e a
sobrevivência de Phylloicus sp. e Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda, Gammaridae), um
fragmentador muito estudado em córregos temperados. As folhas deste experimento
foram escolhidas de forma que fossem constituídos dois pares compostos por espécies
tropicais e temperadas apresentando baixos teores de lignina e nitrogênio (Swietenia
macrophylla e Betula pubescens) e altos teores de lignina e moderados de nitrogênio
(Hymenaea courbaril e Fagus sylvatica). Os principais resultados deste experimento
foram: (a) Phylloicus e Gammarus apresentaram preferências alimentares
semelhantes: Betula foi a espécie mais consumida (Phylloicus: 0,11 a 0,17 mg mg-1
dia-1; Gammarus: 0,14 a 0,22 mg mg-1 dia-1), enquanto Hymenaea não foi consumida
e Fagus e Swietenia foram pouco consumidas pelos fragmentadores; (b) Phylloicus
consumiu mais Swietenia, enquanto Gammarus consumiu mais Swietenia e Betula do
que Hymenaea e Fagus; (c) a sobrevivência de Phylloicus foi extremamente baixa
(9%) e as larvas que se alimentaram de Betula sobreviveram mais do que aquelas que
se alimentaram de Hymenaea; (d) a sobrevivência de Gammarus foi bem maior (80%)
e não foram encontradas diferenças entre os tratamentos alimentares. Desta forma,
3
concluiu-se que Phylloicus e Gammarus apresentaram a mesma preferência alimentar
quando expostos a detritos de baixa qualidade nutricional e o comportamento
alimentar de ambos os fragmentadores foi influenciado principalmente pelas
concentrações de lignina dos detritos foliares.
Estes resultados evidenciaram que as baixas taxas de decomposição que vem
sendo observadas nos córregos do Cerrado estão mais relacionadas à qualidade das
folhas disponíveis do que a um diferente comportamento dos fragmentadores nestes
ecossistemas.
4
Abstract
The objective of this thesis was to evaluate the behavior of Phylloicus sp.
(Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae) when exposed to leaf species differing in nutritional
quality and toughness. The experiments were elaborated according to 3 hypotheses:
(1) Phylloicus larvae select leaf species to build a more resistant case; (2) Eucalyptus
leaves are preferred and promote higher growth and survivorship of Phylloicus larvae
than Cerrado native leaves, with low nutritional quality; and (3) shredders activity in
Cerrado streams is limited by the quality of available leaves. This thesis is composed
by 4 chapters concerning to laboratorial and field experiments done with invertebrate
shredders sampled in a tropical stream in Brazil and in a temperate one in
Switzerland.
The First Chapter refers to an experiment developed to evaluate the case-
building behavior of Phylloicus larvae exposed to different leaf species. The main
results were: (a) Eucalyptus and Myrcia were used more (36.4 and 35.7%) than
Protium (20.0%) for case-building while Miconia was used in an intermediate
proportion (28.6%); and (b) selection of material for case-building was resource
density-dependent and larvae preferentially used leaves with higher phenolic
concentrations independently of toughness and biomass : area ratio. It was concluded
that Phylloicus larvae present a wide plasticity in the case-building behavior and their
preference was determined by leaf chemistry and availability.
The Second Chapter refers to a procedure developed to determine which linear
body dimension was best suitable and which mathematical functions could be used to
describe length dry-mass relationships for the studied population of Phylloicus. Body
length provided the best fitted equations to estimate biomass, followed by head
capsule width and interocular distance, and the highest coefficients of determination
were found in power function and exponential models. It was concluded that the
described length-dry mass relationships were significant and can be used, for
example, in laboratorial experiments to assess the growth rates and secondary
production of these shredders.
The Third Chapter refers to laboratorial and field experiments developed to
determine Phylloicus sp. larvae food preferences, growth rates and survival when
feeding on leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and 3 leaf species native from Cerrado
5
(Brazilian savannah) in Minas Gerais State (Myrcia guyanensis, Miconia chartacea,
and Protium brasiliense). The main results were: (a) Eucalyptus was more consumed
than Myrcia (0.436 and 0.209 mg mg-1 day-1) in the food preference experiment,
while Miconia was consumed on intermediate rates (0.230 mg mg-1 day-1) and
Protium was not consumed; (b) Phylloicus daily growth rates ranged from 0.08 to
0.14 mg day-1 and differences were not found among food treatments; and (c) survival
of larvae fed Eucalyptus (68%) and Miconia (64%) was significantly higher than
those fed Myrcia (50%) and Protium (32%). It was concluded that Phylloicus feeding
behavior was more influenced by the quality than origin (native/exotic) of available
leaves and Eucalyptus leaves did not consist in a resource of higher food quality to
Phylloicus larvae than Cerrado native species.
In the Forth Chapter it was compared the food preferences, consumption rates,
and survival of Phylloicus sp. and Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda, Gammaridae), a
well-studied shredder from temperate streams. Leaves were chosen such we had pairs
composed by tropical and temperate leaves presenting low lignin and nitrogen
contents (Swietenia macrophylla and Betula pubescens) and high lignin and moderate
nitrogen contents (Hymenaea courbaril and Fagus sylvatica). The main results were:
(a) Phylloicus and Gammarus exhibited similar food preferences: Betula was the most
consumed leaf species (Phylloicus: 0.11 to 0.17 mg mg-1 day-1; Gammarus: 0.14 to
0.22 mg mg-1 day-1) while Hymenaea was not consumed, and Fagus and Swietenia
were few consumed by both shredders; (b) Phylloicus consumed more Swietenia
while Gammarus consumed more Swietenia and Betula than Hymenaea and Fagus;
(c) Phylloicus survivorship was extremely low (9%) and larvae fed on Betula
survived more than those fed on Hymenaea; and (d) Gammarus survival was much
higher (80%) and no differences were found among food treatments. It was concluded
that Phylloicus and Gammarus had the same food preferences when exposed to leaves
of low nutritional quality, and the feeding behavior of both shredders was mainly
influenced by leaf lignin contents.
These results evidenced that the low breakdown rates that have been observed
in Cerrado streams are more related to the quality of available leaves than to a
different shredder behavior in these ecosystems.
6
Apresentação
Estudos realizados em diferentes córregos tropicais têm encontrado baixa
abundância de invertebrados fragmentadores (Dobson et al., 2002; Mathuriau &
Chauvet, 2002; Jacobsen et al., 2008; Li & Dudgeon, 2009). Além disso, poucos taxa
de invertebrados aquáticos são caracterizados como fragmentadores de detritos
foliares nestes ecossistemas. Neste sentido, as menores taxas de decomposição de
detritos foliares encontradas nos córregos tropicais, quando comparadas às de região
temperada, têm sido atribuídas principalmente a uma menor participação de
fragmentadores exclusivos neste processo (Irons et al., 1994). Entretanto, alguns
estudos mais recentes demonstraram que os invertebrados fragmentadores também
podem ser abundantes em córregos tropicais (Cheshire et al., 2005).
De acordo com Wantzen & Wagner (2006), duas das possíveis explicações
para a variável contribuição dos fragmentadores no processo de decomposição de
detritos foliares em ecossistemas tropicais são: (1) as características hidrológicas e os
padrões de distúrbios temporais/sazonais dos ecossistemas lóticos, pois as fortes
chuvas sazonais modificam o leito dos córregos e podem afetar a disponibilidade de
recursos alimentares, e (2) as características físicas e químicas das folhas tropicais,
que geralmente são mais duras e apresentam menores teores de nutrientes e maiores
teores de compostos secundários, que podem dificultar o uso destes recursos pelos
fragmentadores.
Os córregos de cabeceira localizados no Cerrado de Minas Gerais apresentam
comunidades de invertebrados bentônicos ricas e diversas. Sua vegetação ripária é
composta por várias espécies que apresentam folhas com características físicas e
químicas contrastantes. Porém, as taxas de decomposição de detritos foliares nestes
ecossistemas são extremamente baixas (Gonçalves et al., 2007; Moretti et al., 2007).
Dentre os invertebrados comumente encontrados associados aos detritos em
decomposição, as larvas do gênero Phylloicus (Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae),
embora pouco abundantes, contribuem com uma porção significativa da biomassa
total destes organismos. Por serem consideradas exclusivamente como
fragmentadoras de matéria orgânica e por também utilizarem os detritos foliares como
matéria prima para a construção de seus casulos, a atividade destas larvas pode
influenciar o processo de decomposição de detritos foliares nestes ambientes.
7
Os experimentos realizados nesta tese avaliaram o comportamento de larvas
de uma população de Phylloicus sp. do manacial Taboões, localizado no Parque
Estadual da Serra do Rola Moça (MG), e estão divididos em 4 capítulos. No Capítulo
1 foi avaliado o comportamento de construção de casulos das larvas de Phylloicus. No
Capítulo 2 foram descritas as equações comprimento-biomassa para 3 medidas
corporais das larvas da população estudada, utilizando-se três modelos matemáticos.
No Capítulo 3 foram avaliados a preferência alimentar, as taxas de crescimento e a
sobrevivência das larvas de Phylloicus quando expostas a folhas de Eucalyptus e de 3
espécies nativas do Cerrado em Minas Gerais. No Capítulo 4 o comportamento
alimentar das larvas de Phylloicus foi comparado ao de Gammarus pulex
(Amphipoda, Gammaridae), um fragmentador típico de regiões temperadas que tem
sido amplamente estudado em experimentos laboratoriais realizados na América do
Norte e Europa. Desta forma, os resultados aqui apresentados representam uma
contribuição ao maior entendimento da real participação dos invertebrados
fragmentadores no processamento de matéria orgânica nos córregos do Cerrado, além
de fornecer novas informações sobre os ecossistemas lóticos tropicais.
8
ObjetivoseHipóteses
Objetivo geral
Avaliar o comportamento de um fragmentador característico dos córregos do
Cerrado de Minas Gerais (Phylloicus sp.) quando exposto a detritos foliares de
diferentes qualidades nutricionais e dureza foliar.
Hipóteses
1. As larvas de Phylloicus selecionam espécies de folhas para construir um
casulo mais resistente.
2. As folhas de Eucalyptus são preferidas e promovem um maior crescimento e
sobrevivência das larvas de Phylloicus do que as folhas do Cerrado, com baixa
qualidade nutricional.
3. A atividade dos invertebrados fragmentadores nos córregos do Cerrado é
limitada pela qualidade das folhas disponíveis.
Objetivos específicos
• Testar se as larvas de Phylloicus selecionam espécies de folhas para a
construção de seus casulos.
• Determinar a melhor relação comprimento-biomassa de uma população de
Phylloicus sp. usando diferentes funções matemáticas e medidas corporais.
• Avaliar os efeitos das folhas de Eucalyptus no comportamento alimentar das
larvas de Phylloicus sp.
• Testar se a preferência alimentar e as taxas de consumo apresentadas pelas
larvas de Phylloicus sp. em experimentos de laboratório refletem as
observadas em campo.
• Testar se Phylloicus e Gammarus exibem a mesma preferência alimentar entre
folhas de diferentes qualidades e se dietas de baixas qualidades afetam o
consumo e a sobrevivência de ambos os fragmentadores de forma similar.
9
ÁreasdeEstudo
Os organismos dos dois taxa de fragmentadores estudados (Phylloicus sp. e
Gammarus pulex) foram coletados, respectivamente, no Manancial Taboões (Brasil) e
no Córrego Chriesbach (Suíça).
O Manancial Taboões (20º03’38" S – 44º03’03" O) localiza-se dentro do
Parque Estadual da Serra do Rola Moça, Minas Gerais. Este manancial está inserido
em um fragmento de mata e apresenta acúmulos de folhas em seu leito durante todo o
ano (Fig. 1). Suas águas apresentam elevadas concentrações de oxigênio (7,2 mg L-1),
pH alcalino (7,9), baixa condutividade elétrica (13,0 µS cm-1) e concentração de
nutrientes (N-total = 35.0 µg L-1 e P-total = 3.0 µg L-1). O Manancial Taboões é
circundado por uma floresta nativa (ca. 92 hectares) que apresenta uma diversa
quantidade de espécies arbóreas, composta principalmente por espécies do Cerrado.
No entanto, algumas espécies características da zona de transição entre o Cerrado e a
Mata Atlântica também estão presentes (COPASA-MG).
O Córrego Chriesbach (47°24’22” N - 08°35’49” L) localiza-se no município
de Dübendorf, a 7 km de Zürich. A microbacia no qual está inserido consiste de áreas
residenciais, industriais e de agricultura. Suas águas são ricas em nutrientes (N-NO3 =
7.0 mg L-1 e SRP = 50.8 µg L-1) e seu leito é esparsamente sombreado, sendo
composto principalmente por areia, cascalho fino e matéria orgânica particulada fina
associada aos bancos de macrófitas (Fig. 1). No verão, os bancos de macrófitas
cobrem quase 100% do leito e são formados principalmente por Ranunculus fluitans
Lam. e Myriophyllum spicatum L. (Kaenel et al., 2000).
1Leafabundanceandphenolic
concentrationscodeterminetheselectionofcasebuildingmaterials
byPhylloicussp.(Trichoptera,Calamoceratidae)*
MarceloS.Moretti1,RafaelD.Loyola2,BárbaraBecker1&MarcosCallisto1
1Lab.EcologiadeBentos,InstitutodeCiênciasBiológicas,UniversidadeFederaldeMinasGerais,Av.AntônioCarlos6627,
C.P.486,30161970,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brasil
2DepartamentodeBiologiaGeral,InstitutodeCiênciasBiológicas,UniversidadeFederaldeGoiás.
C.P.131,74001970,Goiânia,GO,Brasil
LarvaofPhylloicussp.(Trichoptera,Calamoceratidae), selecting leafmaterials for case‐building in alaboratoryexperiment.
*PublishedinHydrobiologia(2009),630,199‐206
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
11
Leaf abundance and phenolic concentrations codetermine the
selection of case-building materials by Phylloicus sp.
(Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae)
Marcelo S. Moretti, Rafael D. Loyola, Bárbara Becker & Marcos Callisto
Abstract Phylloicus sp. larvae live on leaf patches in slow flowing waters and build
dorso-ventrally flattened cases from leaf pieces. We hypothesized that Phylloicus
larvae are selective towards certain leaf species to build a more resistant case. We
exposed Phylloicus larvae to equal-area leaf discs of 3 plant species from the
Brazilian Cerrado (Myrcia guyanensis, Miconia chartacea and Protium brasiliense)
and one non-native species (Eucalyptus camaldulensis). Phylloicus larvae built cases
with discs of all plant species. However, discs of E. camaldulensis and M. guyanensis
were used more (36.4 and 35.7%, respectively) than those of P. brasiliense (20.0%).
Discs of M. chartacea were used in an intermediate proportion (28.6%). Selection
was resource density-dependent, i.e., when P. brasiliense was offered at higher
abundance, it was used more frequently by larvae (ANOVA, P < 0.001). Plant species
differed in leaf toughness, phenolic concentration, and biomass:area ratio (Kruskal-
Wallis, P < 0.05). Larvae preferentially used leaves with higher phenolic
concentrations (Rs = 0.907, P < 0.001) independently of toughness and biomass:area
ratio. We suggest that Phylloicus selects for case-building leaves that are chemically
protected against microbial degradation and shredder consumption, and this selection
depends on leaf abundance. Our results also reinforce the importance of riparian
resources and their diversity to the maintenance of aquatic consumers in tropical
shaded streams.
Keywords Shredder behavior, Brazilian Cerrado, Leaf traits, Tropical streams,
Phylloicus
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
12
Introduction
The Trichoptera (Caddisflies) are one of the most taxonomically rich orders of aquatic
insects, with larvae found in nearly all freshwaters (Resh & Rosenberg, 1984; Flint et
al., 1999) and occupying diverse microhabitats and trophic niches (de Moor &
Ivanov, 2008). Part of this diversity results from variable use of silk secreted by the
larvae during netspinning and case-building (Wiggins, 1996, 2004). Case-building is
energetically expensive but protects caddisflies against predators (Otto & Svensson,
1980; Stevens et al., 1999; Otto, 2000; Boyero et al., 2006).
The Calamoceratidae is a cosmopolitan family of eight extant genera, with
over 100 described species (Prather, 2003). The genus Phylloicus Müller, 1880,
includes 61 known species, and is the largest calamoceratid genus in the New World
(Huamantinco et al., 2005). Species are distributed throughout Latin America, but are
especially diverse in Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela (Prather, 2003). Phylloicus larvae
are normally found on submerged leaves in stream pools and/or lateral springs (Flint
et al., 1999; Wantzen & Wagner, 2006). These larvae are exclusive leaf feeders
(shredders), exerting an important role in the conversion of leaf litter into secondary
production and promoting the conversion of coarse particulate organic matter
(CPOM) into fine particulate organic matter (FPOM) in lotic ecosystems (Cummins et
al., 1989; Wallace & Webster, 1996; Flint et al., 1999; Rincón & Martínez, 2006).
Phylloicus larvae build dorso-ventrally flattened cases using several leaf
pieces (Wiggins, 1996). Because they cut leaf pieces themselves, it is possible that
abundance, quality, and toughness of available leaves in stream pools determine case-
building behavior. Rincón & Martínez (2006), studying the feeding preferences of
Phylloicus sp. in Venezuela, observed that these larvae preferred building their cases
from leaves with higher levels of phenolics and lignins.
The objective of this investigation was to test whether Phylloicus larvae select
leaves of particular plant species for case-building. We addressed three questions: (1)
Are Phylloicus larvae capable of building their cases with leaves of only one plant
species? (2) Whenever leaves of more than one species are available, is there a plant
species selected preferentially by the larvae for case-building? (3) Is the mechanism
of plant species selection (if it exists) dependent on resource density?
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
13
Methods
Larvae sampling site and collection
Larvae were collected at Taboões spring (20° 03' 38" S - 44° 03' 03" W), located
inside the Serra do Rola Moça State Park, Minas Gerais State, southeastern Brazil.
The spring has a canopy of riparian trees with fallen leaves accumulating in patches
within the spring all year. On the sampling date, abiotic parameters (temperature, pH,
electrical conductivity, redox, dissolved oxygen, total dissolved solids and turbidity)
were measured in situ using a Horiba multi-probe (Horiba, Irvine, CA, USA). Total
nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations were determined according to APHA
(1992). Spring waters were well oxygenated, alkaline with low conductivity and
nutrient concentrations (Table 1).
Table 1 Water properties of Taboões spring (Serra do Rola Moça State Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil). Values from a single observation.
Parameters
Temperature (°C) 20.2 pH 7.9 Electrical conductivity (µS cm-1) at 25 °C 13.0 Redox (mV) 184.0 Dissolved oxygen (mg L-1) 7.2 Total N (µg L-1) 35.0 Total P (µg L-1) 3.0 Total dissolved solids (µg L-1) 10.0 Turbidity (NTU) 8.0
One hundred and twenty larvae of one undetermined species of Phylloicus
(Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae) were collected on June 23rd 2008, with a hand net.
They were taken to the laboratory in an isothermic box with stream water. In the
laboratory, they were acclimatized for 24 hours in an aquarium (80 cm long, 20 cm
wide, 40 cm high) with spring water and a bottom of fine gravel. The aquarium was
aerated continuously and some leaves, collected together with the insects in the same
pools, were offered as food.
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
14
Leaves
In our experiments, we used senescent leaves of three plant species native to the
Brazilian Cerrado (Myrcia guyanensis Aubl., Miconia chartacea Triana and Protium
brasiliense Engl.) and one non-native species (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn.).
These leaves were collected from plastic nets (1 m2, 10 mm mesh size, approximately
1.5 m height) implanted in the riparian zone (native species) and in a monoculture of
E. camaldulensis located nearby. All leaves were air dried, sorted by species, and
stored at room temperature until needed.
We chose the native species because they are abundant in the riparian forests
and present different breakdown rates in Brazilian Cerrado streams. M. guyanensis
shows the highest breakdown rate (k = 0.0063 day–1) followed by M. chartacea (k =
0.0033 day–1) and P. brasiliense (k = 0.0020 day–1; Moretti et al., 2007). Eucalyptus
camaldulensis was used in the experiments because many Cerrado areas have been
replanted with eucalyptus monocultures (Klink & Machado, 2005). Eucalyptus trees
have invaded the riparian forests of some Cerrado streams and the consequences of
this change in the litter inputs on invertebrate assemblages are still poorly understood.
Case-building experiments
In the laboratory, the cases were carefully dismantled to remove the larvae. No larva
died during this procedure. The individuals were then placed individually in plastic
cups (12 cm diameter, 9 cm high) containing burnt fine gravel (4 h at 400 °C) and 400
ml of filtered spring water. Plastic cups were aerated and kept at 21 °C with a
photoperiod of 12 h light and 12 h dark. Leaf discs of 1.8 cm diameter cut with a cork
borer were offered according to the three experiments described below. All discs were
cut from unconditioned leaves to avoid them being eaten. No evidence of larvae
feeding was observed during the experiments. In each experiment, we observed the
cups over 24 h (different observers), measured the time spent to build a new case, and
counted the number of discs used by each larva for case-building. One leaf disc was
considered as “used” when the whole disc or part of it was incorporated in the new
case. The replicate (plastic cup) was discarded if the individual died after the
beginning of the experiments.
In the first experiment, we distributed 40 larvae in individual cups containing
16 discs from only one of the four plant species (M. guyanensis, M. chartacea, P.
brasiliense or E. camaldulensis) to evaluate the capability of larvae to use the leaf
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
15
substrates of the four tested plant species (10 replicates per species). In a second
experiment, 40 larvae were randomly assigned to individual cups along with 16 leaf
discs, 4 of each plant species, to evaluate whether the larvae would select discs of
particular species for case-building.
Finally, in a third experiment, we evaluated whether the abundance of leaf
discs could affect their selection. To pursue this question, we prepared two treatments
using the most used and the least used plant species observed in the second
experiment in different abundances. In the first treatment, we offered in each cup 12
discs of the most used plant species and 4 discs of the least used one. In the second
treatment, we offered 4 discs of the most used species and 12 of the least used plant
species. Larvae (12 replicates per treatment) were randomly distributed into each
treatment.
Characterization of plant species leaves
We estimated leaf toughness with a device that measures the force needed to pierce a
leaf disc with a piston of 0.79 mm diameter (see Graça & Zimmer, 2005). To
determine the toughness of each plant species, we cut leaf discs, avoiding leaf veins,
from four leaves using a cork borer of 1.8 cm diameter. Four leaf discs of each plant
species were weighed with a 0.1 mg precision balance to determine the biomass:area
ratio. We also ground some leaf material for the analyses of total phenolics according
to Bärlocher & Graça (2005). Four replicates of each plant species were analyzed.
Statistical analyses
In order to test for significant differences in the plant species use for case-building,
we compared the numbers of discs used in Experiment 1 with a one-way ANOVA
and in Experiment 2 with Friedman’s test, a non-parametric repeated measures
comparison test. This test was used because larvae choice was not independent when
all plant species were simultaneously offered in Experiment 2 (Roa, 1992). Multiple
pairwise comparisons were done by Wilcoxon signed ranks test, with the appropriate
Bonferroni correction. In Experiment 3, we compared the numbers of discs used with
a two-way ANOVA (log transformed data), using plant species and abundance as
factors. ANOVA models used in Experiments 1 and 3 were validated through residual
analyses. We used a Kruskal-Wallis test to look for differences in disc toughness
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
16
values (g), phenolic concentrations (% g-1 dry mass) and biomass:area ratios (mg cm-
2) among all plant species used in the experiments.
We also calculated Spearman's rank correlation coefficients to evaluate the
relationship between the total number of discs used by Phylloicus larvae in
Experiment 2 with leaf toughness, leaf phenolic concentration, and leaf biomass:area
ratio of each plant species. All statistical analyses were performed using SYSTAT
10.2 (SYSTAT Software Inc., 2002) and based on Zar (1999).
Results
Phylloicus larvae built cases with leaves of all studied species (Fig. 1) and mortality
rates were relatively low (l0.8%, across all experiments). When discs of only one
plant species were offered (Experiment 1), larvae used a mean number of discs
ranging between 5.7 and 7.3, regardless of which plant species was present (F3,32 =
1.661, P = 0.194; Fig. 2A).
Fig. 1 Cases built by Phylloicus larvae with monospecific (left) and multispecies (right) plant leaf discs.
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
17
Fig. 2 Number of discs used by Phylloicus larvae (mean ± SE) when plant species were offered individually (A) and combined (B). Values sharing superscript letters are not statistically different (P > 0.05).
When exposed to the four plant species together (Experiment 2), larvae were
selective (Friedman’s value = 9.439, df = 3, P = 0.024), using significantly fewer
discs of P. brasiliense (20.0%) than E. camaldulensis (36.4%) and M. guyanensis
(35.7%). Discs of M. chartacea were used in an intermediate proportion (28.6%), not
differing from the others (Fig. 2B).
The third experiment revealed that plant species selection was dependent on
leaf abundance, i.e., even though E. camaldulensis and M. guyanensis were more used
than P. brasiliense, whenever the least preferred species was more abundant in the
system, it was more used, independently if combined with discs of E. camaldulensis
or M. guyanensis (Table 2, Fig. 3).
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
18
Table 2 Results from a two-way ANOVA of general differences in number of discs used on the 2 plant
species combinations in experiment 3. Data are from Figure 3.
Leaf Combination Factor F df P
E. camaldulensis and Leaf 4.031 1 0.053 P. brasiliense Abundance 27.780 1 <0.001 Leaf X Abundance 0.000 1 1.000
M. guyanensis and Leaf 5.175 1 0.029 P. brasiliense Abundance 19.725 1 <0.001 Leaf X Abundance 0.106 1 0.747
Fig. 3 Number of discs used by Phylloicus larvae when Eucalyptus camaldulensis (A) and Myrcia guyanensis (B) were offered combined with Protium brasiliense in different leaf disc abundances. Values sharing superscript letters are not statistically different (P > 0.05).
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
19
Plant species differed in toughness (Table 3). M. guyanensis and P. brasiliense
were tougher, whereas E. camaldulensis and M. chartacea were the softest leaves.
Phenolic concentrations also differed among plant species and P. brasiliense showed
the lowest phenolic concentrations (Table 3). Finally, E. camaldulensis had thinner
leaves than M. guyanensis and M. chartacea. Leaf selection by Phylloicus was
correlated with phenolic concentrations (Rs = 0.907, t34 = 6.804, P < 0.001) but not
leaf toughness and thickness (toughness: Rs = - 0.294, t34 = - 1.795, P > 0.05;
biomass:area ratio: Rs = - 0.134, t34 = - 0.788, P > 0.05).
Table 3 Leaf toughness (g), phenolic concentration (% g-1 dry mass) and biomass:area ratio (mg cm-2) of the four plant species tested (mean ± SE; n = 4), Kruskal-Wallis H and probability P. Values sharing superscript letters are not statistically different (P > 0.05).
Toughness Phenolics Biomass:area
Myrcia guyanensis 276.95 ± 16.25a 10.70 ± 0.25a,b 39.32 ± 0.83a Miconia chartacea 100.35 ± 23.83b 9.38 ± 0.10a,b 47.83 ± 1.28a Protium brasiliense 210.85 ± 28.45a 7.55 ± 0.11a 30.01 ± 0.61a,b Eucalyptus camaldulensis 83.62 ± 10.26b 10.94 ± 0.06b 24.48 ± 0.61b H 27.83 10.46 27.44 P <0.001 0.015 <0.001
Discussion
Phylloicus larvae built cases with all plant species offered. After removal from their
original cases and placement in the plastic cups, each larva immediately took shelter
under the leaf discs and started to cut some of them. Larvae spent less than 24 h to
build new cases and in 11 cups new cases were observed only 3 h after the beginning
of the experiments. The behavior exhibited by the larvae and the time needed to build
their cases were similar to those observed by Norwood & Stewart (2002) for the
North American Phylloicus ornatus.
The preference of Phylloicus larvae for E. camaldulensis and M. guyanensis
was positively correlated with leaf phenolic concentrations, suggesting that Phylloicus
larvae preferred to build cases with less palatable leaf pieces (Graça, 2001; Bärlocher
& Graça, 2005). Given that Phylloicus cases present a relatively large surface area
(Wantzen & Wagner, 2006), the use of low quality plant species for case-building
may be a strategy to make their cases less attractive to other invertebrate shredders
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
20
(Bastian et al., 2007) and to microbial degradation since phenolics are known to retard
microbial colonization (Campbell & Fuchshuber, 1995; Salusso, 2000).
Phylloicus preference was independent of leaf toughness. This may indicate
that among all leaf characteristics that set the preferences for case-building, toughness
might be one of lower importance. Bastian et al. (2007) observed that two species of
caddisfly differed in their choice of leaves for case-building, with Anisocentropus
kirramus using relatively tough leaves and Lectrides varians using much softer
leaves. The effect of toughness should be more systematically tested in future studies
using a larger number of plant species.
In the multiple-choice experiment, Phylloicus larvae used more discs of
species with faster decomposition (E. camaldulensis and M. guyanensis). However,
even having differences in their breakdown rates, we must remark that breakdown
rates of Cerrado plant species are among the slowest observed in tropical
environments (see Moretti et al., 2007) and E. camaldulensis decomposes
approximately 2.5 times faster than M. guyanensis (J. F. Gonçalves, unpublished
data), the native species with the highest breakdown rate. Based on this, we believe
that Phylloicus cases built with E. camaldulensis are not as durable as the ones made
with native species. Then, in environments in which Eucalyptus leaves are available
alone or in larger quantities, larvae would tend to build and/or add more leaf pieces to
their cases, spending more energy than in natural conditions. And this fact could have
significant consequences to adult maturation of insects such as caddisflies, which
present minimal adult feeding (Stevens et al., 1999).
Despite preference for some plant species, Phylloicus case-building behavior
is sufficiently flexible to adapt to the abundance of leaves available in their habitats.
And this pattern was observed independently of the presence of E. camaldulensis, the
non-native species. According to some authors, the type of organic material used by
caddisflies for case-building may vary depending on its abundance (Hanna, 1961;
Otto & Svensson, 1980). Moreover, Moretti & Loyola (2005) demonstrated that
larvae of Barypenthus concolor, a tube-case-building trichopteran, use particle sizes
in the same proportions as they are available in the habitat to build their cases. All
these findings imply great selective pressure operating on this behavior.
Our results corroborate in part those of Rincón & Martínez (2006), who
observed Phylloicus preference for leaves of low palatability and higher lignin
contents for case-building. And this fact is probably related to the intrinsic traits of
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
21
plant species used in these two studies, which belong to different vegetation types.
For example, the lignin contents of the species used here are on average 1.6 times
higher than the ones from the species used by Rincón & Martínez (2006) in
Venezuela (M. S. Moretti, unpublished data). Due to harsh conditions (e.g., high solar
radiation, water stress, and herbivory), Brazilian Cerrado plant species have leaves
with thick cuticles and high contents of structural and inhibitory compounds (Marques
et al., 2000; Oliveira & Marquis, 2002; Wantzen & Wagner, 2006). On the other
hand, plant species used by Rincón & Martínez (2006) are native from a dry tropical
semideciduous forest located in Northwestern Venezuela (Rincón et al., 2005), a
region where annual precipitation is higher and plant species are subject to fewer
environmental stresses than in Cerrado. However, the results of both studies suggest
that Phylloicus larvae build cases with less palatable leaves when exposed to a group
of tough leaves (present study) or with the toughest leaves among the ones that were
available in the system (Rincón & Martinez, 2006).
Since E. camaldulensis is not present in the site where larvae were collected,
preferences here observed were measured in a non-natural environment where
animals responded to leaf traits they have not faced before, suggesting that our results
could be different if we had used only native species. In spite of this, we decided to
include E. camaldulensis in our experiments because this is one of the biggest threats
to the Cerrado biome in southeastern Brazil (Klink & Machado, 2005) and leaves of
this species will probably reach several streams in the near future.
According to our results, Phylloicus larvae select for case-building those
leaves that are chemically protected against microbial degradation and shredder
consumption, even if they are from a non-native species like E. camaldulensis.
Moreover, we found that this preference is also influenced by leaf abundance,
indicating that larvae are dependent on species composition in the riparian zone.
Therefore, changes in riparian vegetation providing leaf substrates (i.e., change of
species and/or substrate homogenization caused by reforestation with a single species)
can be important to Phylloicus larvae due to the impact on growth and reproduction.
In this way, our findings also reinforce the importance of riparian resources and their
diversity to the maintenance of aquatic consumers in tropical shaded streams.
To summarize, our results indicate that Phylloicus larvae present a high
plasticity on case-building behavior. Furthermore, it seems that their selection
depends on each situation, i.e., on which plant species are present and their relative
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
22
abundance. A combination of variables such as leaf chemistry, availability and
toughness will determine larvae preferences. Other factors, such as the breakdown
rates of different leaf types and the presence of predators may influence case
construction also, and should be evaluated.
Acknowledgments We thank COPASA-MG and IEF-MG for logistical facilities and
research licenses. This work was supported by FAPEMIG, CNPq, CAPES
Foundation, and US Fish & Wildlife Service. We also thank Manuel Graça, Robert
Hughes and 3 anonymous referees for valuable comments on the previous version of
the manuscript, Juliana França and Victor Gomes for assistance in the laboratory.
References
APHA, 1992. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (18th
ed.). American Public Health Association, Washington DC.
Bärlocher, F. & M. A. S. Graça, 2005. Total phenolics. In Graça, M. A. S., F.
Bärlocher & M. O. Gessner (eds), Methods to study litter decomposition: a
practical guide. Springer, Dordrecht: 45-48.
Bastian, M., L. Boyero, B. R. Jackes & R. G. Pearson, 2007. Leaf litter diversity and
shredder preferences in an Australian tropical rain-forest stream. Journal of
Tropical Ecology 23: 219-229.
Boyero, L., P. A. Rincón & J. Bosch, 2006. Case selection by a limnephilid caddisfly
[Potamophylax latipennis (Curtis)] in response to different predators. Behavioral
Ecology and Sociobiology 59: 364-372.
Campbell, I. C. & L. Fuchshuber, 1995. Polyphenols, condensed tannins, and
processing rates of tropical and temperate leaves in an Australian stream. Journal
of the North American Benthological Society 14: 174-182.
Cummins, K. W., M. A. Wilzbach, D. M. Gates, J. B. Perry & W. B. Talaiferro, 1989.
Shredders and riparian vegetation. BioScience 39: 24-30.
de Moor, F. C. & V. D. Ivanov, 2008. Global diversity of caddisflies (Trichoptera:
Insecta) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 393-407.
Flint, O. S., R. W. Holzenthal & S. C. Harris, 1999. Catalog of the Neotropical
caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera). Special Publication, Ohio Biological Survey,
Columbus.
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
23
Graça, M. A. S., 2001. The role of invertebrates on leaf litter decomposition in
streams – a review. International Review of Hydrobiology 86: 383-393.
Graça, M. A. S. & M. Zimmer, 2005. Leaf toughness. In Graça, M. A. S., F.
Bärlocher & M. O. Gessner (eds), Methods to study litter decomposition: a
practical guide. Springer, Dordrecht: 109-113.
Hanna, H. M., 1961. Selection of materials for case-building larvae of caddis flies
(Trichoptera). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 36: 37-47.
Huamantinco, A. A., L. L. Dumas & J. L. Nessimian, 2005. Description of larva and
pupa of Phylloicus abdominalis Ulmer, 1905 (Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae).
Zootaxa 1039: 19-26.
Klink, C. A. & R. B. Machado, 2005. Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado.
Conservation Biology 19: 707-713.
Marques, A. R., Q. S. Garcia, J. L. P. Resende & G. W. Fernandes, 2000. Variations
in leaf characteristics of two species of Miconia in the Brazilian cerrado under
different light intensities. Tropical Ecology 41: 47-60.
Moretti, M. S. & R. D. Loyola, 2005. Does Barypenthus concolor Burmeister
(Trichoptera: Odontoceridae) select particles of different sizes for case building?
Neotropical Entomology 34: 337-340.
Moretti, M. S., J. F. Gonçalves, R. Ligeiro & M. Callisto, 2007. Invertebrates
colonization on native tree leaves in a neotropical stream (Brazil). International
Review of Hydrobiology 92: 199-210.
Norwood, J. C. & K. W. Stewart, 2002. Life history and case-building behavior of
Phylloicus ornatus (Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae) in two spring-fed streams in
Texas. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95: 44-56.
Oliveira, P. S. & R. J. Marquis, 2002. The cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and natural
history of netropical Savanna. Columbia University Press, New York.
Otto, C., 2000. Cost and benefit from shield cases in caddis larvae. Hydrobiologia
436: 35-40.
Otto, C. & B. S. Svensson, 1980. The significance of case material selection for the
survival of caddis larvae. Journal of Animal Ecology 49: 855-865.
Prather, A. L., 2003. Revision of the Neotropical caddisfly genus Phylloicus
(Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae). Zootaxa 275: 1-214.
Resh, V. H. & D. M. Rosenberg (eds), 1984. The ecology of aquatic insects. Praeger,
New York.
Chapter1:Phylloicuscase‐buildingbehavior
24
Rincón, J. & I. Martínez, 2006. Food quality and feeding preferences of Phylloicus sp.
(Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae). Journal of the North American Benthological
Society 25: 209-215.
Rincón, J., I. Martínez, E. León & N. Ávila, 2005. Procesamiento de la hojarasca de
Anacardium excelsum en una corriente intermitente tropical del noroeste de
Venezuela. Interciencia 30: 228-234.
Roa, R., 1992. Design and analysis of multiple-choice feeding preference
experiments. Oecologia 89: 509-515.
Salusso, M. M., 2000. Biodegradation of subtropical forest woods from north-west
Argentina by Pleurotus laciniatocrenatus. New Zealand Journal of Botany 38:
721-724.
Stevens, D. J., M. H. Hansell, J. A. Freel & P. Monaghan, 1999. Developmental
trade-offs in caddis flies: increased investment in larval defense alters adult
resource allocation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266: 1049-
1054.
Wallace, J. B. & J. R. Webster, 1996. The role of macroinvertebrates in stream
ecosystem function. Annual Review of Entomology 41: 115-139.
Wantzen, K. M. & R. Wagner, 2006. Detritus processing by invertebrate shredders: a
neotropical–temperate comparison. Journal of the North American Benthological
Society 25: 216-232.
Wiggins, G. B., 1996. Larvae of North American caddisfly genera (Trichoptera), 2nd
edn. University of Toronto Press, Ontario.
Wiggins, G. B., 2004. Caddisflies, the underwater architects. University of Toronto
Press, Toronto, Buffalo, London.
Zar, J. H., 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
2LengthdrymassrelationshipsforatypicalshredderinBrazilianstreams
(Trichoptera,Calamoceratidae)*
BárbaraBecker,MarceloS.Moretti&MarcosCallisto
Lab.EcologiadeBentos,InstitutodeCiênciasBiológicas,UniversidadeFederaldeMinasGerais,Av.AntônioCarlos6627,
CP486,30161970,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brasil
Preparation ofPhylloicus sp. larvae(Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae) forthe measurement of body length,headcapsulewidth,andinteroculardistance.
*PublishedinAquaticInsects(2009),31,227‐234
Chapter2:Length‐drymassrelationshipsforPhylloicus
26
Length-dry mass relationships for a typical shredder
in Brazilian streams (Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae)
Bárbara Becker, Marcelo S. Moretti & Marcos Callisto
Abstract The aims of this study were to determine which linear body dimensions are
best suitable and which mathematical functions can be used to describe length dry-
mass relationships for a population of Phylloicus sp. (Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae)
larvae. We measured 3 linear body dimensions (body length, head capsule width and
interocular distance) of 54 larvae to use as dry mass predictors. For the description of
length-dry mass relationships we used linear, exponential and power function models.
Body length provided the best fitted equations to estimate biomass, followed by head
capsule width and interocular distance. The highest coefficients of determination were
found in power function and exponential models. These relationships can be useful to
determine the growth rate and/or secondary production of Phylloicus larvae in future
laboratory experiments, as well as to understand the importance of these shredders in
the energy flux of shaded tropical streams.
Keywords Size-mass equations, biomass estimation, linear body dimensions,
Phylloicus, tropical shredders.
Chapter2:Length‐drymassrelationshipsforPhylloicus
27
Introduction
Biomass of aquatic macroinvertebrates is important to determine growth rates and/or
secondary production, as well as to understand life histories, seasonal patterns and
trophic relationships between functional feeding groups (Benke, 1996; Burgherr and
Meyer, 1997). Data on macroinvertebrate biomass can also be useful in colonization
studies or quantifying the role of detritivores on leaf decomposition (Cressa, 1999).
Among the different approaches to biomass determination, the most common
is the direct weighing of individual specimens (Dermott and Paterson, 1974; Smock,
1980; Meyer, 1989). However, this approach is often very time consuming, and prone
to error if the insects have been previously stored in chemical preservatives (e.g.
formaline or alcohol), which can cause alterations in their dry mass (Donald and
Paterson, 1977; Downing and Rigler, 1984; Kato and Miyasaka, 2007). Direct
determination of dry mass has the added disadvantage of rendering the specimen
useless for further examination as a result of the drying process (Towers et al., 1994).
An alternative to avoid such disadvantages is to estimate the biomass
indirectly, using length-dry mass conversions (Gould, 1966; Peters, 1983; Burgherr
and Meyer, 1997, Benke et al., 1999). Estimating dry-mass indirectly from linear
body dimensions (e.g. body length, head capsule width) is more rapid than direct mass
determination, particularly for small invertebrates. Moreover, in laboratory
experiments assessing invertebrates feeding behavior, this approach allows the
estimation of initial biomass without stressing and/or killing the organisms.
Length-dry mass relationships have been used to estimate the biomass of
invertebrates from different geographical locations and of taxa with similar body
shapes (Johnston and Cunjak, 1999). Most of the length dry-mass relationships for
stream invertebrates were estimated for North American and European taxa (Smock,
1980; Meyer, 1989) and, until now, only a few data were proposed for the Tropical
region. Furthermore, previous studies suggested the need to use taxa-specific
relationships because they are more precise, once different taxa may differ in body
shape and volume (Schoener, 1980; Smock, 1980; Gowing and Recher, 1985; Cressa,
1986).
Only few invertebrate taxa have been mentioned as shredders in neotropical
streams. Among them, larvae of the genus Phylloicus Müller, 1880 (Trichoptera,
Calamoceratidae) are well distributed throughout Latin America and, in some streams,
Chapter2:Length‐drymassrelationshipsforPhylloicus
28
can be found easily on leaf patches with low water current (Prather, 2003). Because
these larvae are also easy to manipulate and keep alive in laboratory conditions, they
have been used in many experiments (e.g. feeding preference, growth, survival and
case building) that aimed to better understand the behavior of shredders and their
influence on leaf decomposition in tropical streams (Graça et al., 2001, Rincón and
Martínez, 2006).
In this study, we analyzed the length-dry mass relationships for a population of
Phylloicus sp. by using three different regression functions (linear, power and
exponential) and three body dimensions in order to determine the best relationship.
Material and Methods
Phylloicus sp. larvae were collected on July 2007 in Taboões spring (20° 03' 38" S -
44° 03' 03" W), located in the Serra do Rola Moça State Park, Minas Gerais State,
southeastern Brazil. The Taboões spring is inside a forest fragment, presenting a well
developed riparian area, which forms a closed canopy. Leaves fall throughout the year
and accumulate in the streambed.
Larvae were found visually, collected with a hand net, and taken to the
laboratory in an isothermic box with stream water. In the laboratory, undamaged
individuals of the same morphospecies were carefully removed from their cases and
placed individually in Petri dishes. Three linear body dimensions were chosen among
the most common used as biomass predictors: body length, head capsule width, and
interocular distance (Meyer, 1989). Body length (BL) was measured as the distance
from the anterior of the head to the posterior of the last abdominal segment. Head
capsule width (HW) was measured across the widest section of the head. Interocular
distance (ID) was measured as the minimum distance between eyes, paralel to head
width. Body dimensions were measured to the nearest 0.1 mm with a Zeiss dissecting
microscope fitted with an ocular micrometer (magnification: 8x for BL measurements,
and 50x for HW and ID measurements). Animals were then placed individually in
pre-weighed aluminum foils, dried at 60°C for 48 h (Meyer, 1989), left to cool in a
desiccator, and their dry-mass (DM) was measured to the nearest 0.1 mg.
Three regression models were calculated for the three Phylloicus body
dimensions, using the method of least squares. The fit of regression equations was
judged by the determination coefficient (r2), the significance level (p, obtained from
Chapter2:Length‐drymassrelationshipsforPhylloicus
29
regression ANOVA) and residual analysis. All statistical analyses were performed
based on Zar (1999).
Results
Body dimensions measures and dry weights of 54 larvae were used for statistical
analyses. Phylloicus dry mass presented the highest variation coefficient, with values
ranging from 1.3 to 26.6 mg (Table 1). Among body dimensions, body length
presented higher range (10.4 - 28.9 mm) and variation coefficient (Table 1).
Table 1 Ranges, mean, standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV, in percentage) for body length, head capsule width, interocular distance (mm) and dry mass (mg) of Phylloicus sp. larvae; n = 54. CV = (SD/Mean) x 100.
Range Mean SD CV Body length 10.4 – 28.9 16.7 2.7 16.2 Head capsule width 0.8 – 1.5 1.3 0.2 14.0 Interocular distance 0.6 – 1.1 1.0 0.1 14.3 Dry mass 1.3 – 26.6 12.1 6.7 54.2
The following regression models were chosen because they provided the best
fits. Conversion of Phylloicus body dimensions to dry mass was determined by linear
(1), exponential (2) and power function (3) models or its logarithmic equivalents:
DM = a + b . L (1)
DM = a . ebL (in linear form: ln DM = ln a + b . L) (2)
DM = a . Lb (in linear form: ln DM = ln a + b . ln L) (3)
where a/b are regression constants, DM is dry mass, L is the linear body dimension
(BL, HW, ID) and e is a mathematical constant (Euler’s number: 2.718).
The parameters of equations (1), (2) and (3) are listed in Table 2. All body
dimensions showed a very high level of significance in the three models (p < 0.01).
Body length provided the best relationships to estimate biomass (Table 2), followed
by interocular distance and head capsule width. These relationships were best fitted by
power function and exponential models that presented very similar coefficients of
Chapter2:Length‐drymassrelationshipsforPhylloicus
30
determination to each body dimension. Figure 1 shows the relations of dry mass as a
function of body length, head capsule width and interocular distance for Phylloicus
larvae. The regression lines and curves were given by power function.
Table 2 Parameters (with the 95% confidence intervals) of the linear, exponential and power function models for the relationship between a linear body dimension (L = body length [BL], head capsule width [HW] or interocular distance [ID], in mm) and dry mass (DM, in mg) of Phylloicus sp. larvae; a, b = regression constants, r2 = coefficient of determination (* p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001). n = 54.
Fig. 1 Scatter diagrams of dry mass versus body length (A), head capsule width (B) and interocular distance (C) on normal coordinates (□) as well as on logarithmic coordinates (●) for Phylloicus sp. larvae. The regression equations (power function) are DM = a . Lb and ln DM = ln a + b . ln L.
A B
C
Chapter2:Length‐drymassrelationshipsforPhylloicus
31
Discussion
Even though all relationships between body dimensions and biomass were highly
significant, body length was the best predictor explaining 75-76% of the variation in
mass. This linear body dimension is widely used for determining length-dry mass
relationships of aquatic invertebrates (e.g., Smock, 1980; Towers et al., 1994;
Burgherr and Meyer, 1997) mainly because it has a broader measuring range. Body
length also provides slightly higher determination coefficients than head capsule
width and interocular distance (González et al., 2002).
Although body length usually gives the best relationships, some authors (see
Cressa, 1999; Marchant and Hehir, 1999; González et al., 2002) prefer to use other
linear body dimensions, like head capsule width, case width, pronotum length or
tarsus length. This probably owes to the fact that, among other reasons, these
structures are sclerotized and less subject to distortion or breakage under manipulation
than body length. In addition, Becker (2005) found that pronotum length is the best
measurement to distinct larval instars of Agapetus fuscipes (Trichoptera) in a German
first-order stream. In the present study, larvae were measured in the same day they
have been sampled. So, all measurements were done on fresh, undamaged and
completely stretched animals, which allowed a precise and reliable determination of
the three studied body dimensions.
The exponential and power function models did not differ between the body
dimensions determined. Most authors found the highest fit between body length and
dry-mass when they use the power function model (e.g., Smock, 1980; Meyer, 1989;
Burgherr and Meyer, 1997) but exponential regressions have been also used by
Dudgeon (1995) and Perán et al. (1999) for length-dry mass relationships of
Hydrocyphon (Coleoptera) and Caenis luctuosa (Ephemeroptera), respectively.
Wenzel et al. (1990) pointed out that differences between the results obtained using
different regression models are low and they decrease when higher number of animals
is used. Although power function is more used, the exponential model should not be
discarded when looking for the best fit of length-dry mass relationships.
In practice, when interpreting a length-dry mass regression equation, “b”
values represent the rate of increase (i.e., slope) of dry weight against length in a
linear relationship, whereas the constant “a” only represents the dry mass of an
organism at a unit length (i.e., 1 mm). It’s known that for tropical aquatic insects the
Chapter2:Length‐drymassrelationshipsforPhylloicus
32
constant b falls short of the expected value of 3, which means that body mass of
insects is more influenced by surface than by volume (Engelmann, 1961). Our results
support those from Cressa (1999) who found that Phylloicus sp. is one of the few taxa
of tropical invertebrates whose slope is higher than 3, so it is possible that in this
genus volume could influence body mass more than surface.
Some variations in length-dry mass relationships for the populations of the
same species, but from different locations, can be caused by physical-chemical
differences of the environment, trophic conditions or genetics. In this way, it is
recommended to determine the relationships for populations under study or use
relationships that were determined for populations from the same streams and/or
regions. For example, Rincón & Martinez (2006), studying the growth rates of
Phylloicus in laboratorial experiments, used the empirical relationship described by
Cressa (1999) who had studied populations from a similar region of Venezuela. On
the other hand, length-dry mass relationships are not much affected by seasons, as
shown by Kato and Miyasaka (2007). These authors suggested that it is not necessary
to measure larvae in dry and wet seasons to have a consistent relationship.
When sampling organisms to determine length-dry mass relationships, one
must be sure that organisms from different sizes (cohorts) have been collected. If not,
only part of the logistic curve of population growth is quantified and the resulting
relationships may not represent the whole population (Begon et al., 1996). In this
study, if we consider the Dyar’s law, an empirical law that suggests an increase of 1.5
in growth at each instar (Wigglesworth, 1972), and the ranges of each body dimension
measured, we can infer that only larvae from the last two instars were sampled. Based
on this, our equations were determined with data from the right side of the curvilinear
relationships between dry mass and body dimensions of this population of Phylloicus
(see Majecki et al., 1997). On the other hand, as we have been monitoring this
population for several months, larvae used in this study presented the same range of
size of the ones that are found visually in most part of the year, suggesting that our
equations were adequate to determine the dry mass of larvae destined to laboratory
experiments.
In conclusion, the length-dry mass relationships here presented can be useful
to determine the growth rate and/or secondary production of Phylloicus. Besides, our
results also reinforce the necessity of more studies focusing on the life cycles of
aquatic insects in the tropical region. We do hope that the present study encourage
Chapter2:Length‐drymassrelationshipsforPhylloicus
33
future research assessing the population dynamics of tropical shredders, as well as to
understand the importance of these individuals on leaf processing, trophic
relationships, colonization rates, and even to compare populations within and between
habitats.
Acknowledgments This study was supported by FAPEMIG, CNPq, CAPES, Eawag,
US Fish and Wildlife Service. We appreciated the help of our laboratory colleagues
Lurdemar Tavares and Juliana França during field and laboratory activities. We are
also thankful to João José Leal, Leandro Oliveira, Vicenç Acuña and two anonymous
reviewers who provided useful comments on the manuscript.
References
Becker, G. (2005), “Life cycle of Agapetus fuscipes (Trichoptera, Glossosomatidae)
in a first-order upland stream in central Germany”, Limnologica, 35, 52-60.
Begon, M., Mortimer, M., and Thompson, D.J. (1996), Population ecology: a unified
study of animals and plants. Blackwell Science, Oxford. 3rd edition.
Benke, A. (1996), “Secondary production of macroinvertebrates”, in Methods in
stream ecology, ed. F.R. Hauer and G.A. Lamberti, New York: Academic, 557-
578.
Benke, A., Huryn, A., Smock, L., and Wallace, J. (1999), “Length-mass relationships
for freshwater macroinvertebrates in North America with particular reference to
the southeastern United States”, Journal of the North American Benthological
Society, 18, 308-343.
Burgherr, P., and Meyer, E.I. (1997), “Regression analysis of linear body dimensions
vs. dry mass in stream macroinvertebrates”, Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 139,
101-112.
Cressa, C. (1986), “Estimaciones de peso seco en función de la longitud cefálica y
clases de tamaño en Campsurus sp. (Ephemeroptera, Polymitarcidae)”, Acta
Científica Venezolana, 37, 170-173.
Cressa, C. (1999), “Dry mass estimates of some tropical aquatic insects”, Revista de
Biología Tropical, 47, 133-141.
Chapter2:Length‐drymassrelationshipsforPhylloicus
34
Dermott, R.M., Paterson, C.G. (1974), “Determining dry weight and percentage dry
matter of chironomid larvae”. Canadian Journal of Zoology 52, 1243-1250.
Donald, G.L., and Paterson, C.G. (1977), “Effects of preservation on wet weight
biomass of chironomid larvae”, Hydrobiologia, 53, 75-80.
Downing, J.A., and Rigler, F.H. (1984), A manual on methods for the assessment of
secondary productivity in fresh waters. Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Oxford.
Dudgeon, D. (1995), “Life history, secondary production and microdistribution of
Hydrocyphon (Coleoptera: Scirtidae) in a tropical forest stream”, Archiv für
Hydrobiologie, 133, 261-271.
Engelmann, M.D. (1961), “The role of soil arthropods in the energetics of an old field
community”, Ecological Monographs, 31, 221-238.
González, J.M., Basaguren, A., and Pozo, J. (2002), “Size-mass relationships of stream
invertebrates in a northern Spain stream”, Hydrobiologia, 489, 131-137.
Gould, S. (1966), “Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny”, Biological
Research, 41, 587-640.
Gowing, G., and Recher, H.F. (1985), “Length-weight relationships for invertebrates
from forest in south-eastern New South Wales”, Australian Journal of Ecology,
9, 5-8.
Graça, M.A.S., Cressa, C., Gessner, M.O., Feio, M.J., Callies, K.A., and Barrios, C.
(2001), “Food quality, feeding preferences, survival and growth of shredders
from temperate and tropical streams”, Freshwater Biology, 46, 947-957.
Johnston, T., and Cunjak, R., (1999), “Dry mass-length relationships for benthic
insects: a review with new data from Catamaran Brook, New Brunswick,
Canada”, Freshwater Biology, 41, 653-674.
Kato, M.G., and Miyasaka, H. (2007), “Length–weight relationships of four predatory
stonefly species in Japan”, Limnology, 8, 171-174.
Majecki, J., Grzybkowska, M., and Reddy, R. (1997), “Density, production and life
cycle of Brachycentrus subnubilus Curtis (Trichoptera: Brachycentridae) in a
lowland river, Central Poland”, Hydrobiologia, 354, 51-56.
Chapter2:Length‐drymassrelationshipsforPhylloicus
35
Marchant, R., and Hehir, G. (1999), “Growth, production and mortality of two species
of Agapetus (Trichoptera: Glossosomatide) in the Acheron River, south-east
Australia”, Freshwater Biology, 42, 655-671.
Meyer, E. (1989), “The relationship between body length parameters and dry mass in
running water invertebrates”, Archiv fiir Hydrobiologie, 117, 191-203.
Perán, A., Velasco, J., and Millán, A. (1999), “Life cycle and secondary production of
Caenis luctuosa (Ephemeroptera) in a semiarid stream (Southeast Spain)”,
Hydrobiologia, 400, 187-194.
Peters, R.H. (1983), The ecological implications of body size, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge.
Prather, A.L. (2003), “Revision of the Neotropical caddisfly genus Phylloicus
(Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae)”, Zootaxa, 275, 1-214.
Rincón, J., and Martínez, I. (2006), “Food quality and feeding preferences of
Phylloicus sp. (Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae)”, Journal of the North American
Benthological Society, 25, 209-215.
Schoener, T.W. (1980), “Length-weight regressions in tropical and temperate forest-
understorey insects”, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 73, 106-
109.
Smock, L.A. (1980), “Relationships between body size and biomass of aquatic
insects”, Freshwater Biology, 10, 375-383.
Towers, D.J., Henderson, I.M., Veltman, C.J. (1994), “Predicting dry weight of New
Zealand aquatic macroinvertebrates from linear dimensions”, New Zealand
Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 28, 159-166.
Wenzel, F., Meyer, E., Schwoerbel, J. (1990), “Morphometry and biomass
determination of dominant mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera) in running waters”,
Archiv für Hydrobiologie,118, 31-46.
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1972), The Principles of Insect Physiology. Butler and Tanner,
United Kingdom.
Zar, J. H. (1999), Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 4th edition.
3AreexoticEucalyptusleavesabetter
foodresourcetoPhylloicussp.(Trichoptera,Calamoceratidae)in
BrazilianCerradostreams?
MarceloS.Moretti,BárbaraBecker&MarcosCallisto
Lab.EcologiadeBentos,InstitutodeCiênciasBiológicas,UniversidadeFederaldeMinasGerais,Av.AntônioCarlos6627,
CP486,30161970,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brasil
LarvaofPhylloicussp.(Trichoptera,Calamoceratidae), one of the fewinvertebrate taxa considered asshredderinNeotropicalstreams.
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
37
Are exotic Eucalyptus leaves a better food resource to Phylloicus sp.
(Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae) in Brazilian Cerrado streams?
Marcelo S. Moretti, Bárbara Becker & Marcos Callisto
SUMMARY
1. Through laboratory and field settings, we investigated food preferences, growth
and survival of Phylloicus sp. (Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae) larvae feeding on
leaves of the exotic Eucalyptus camaldulensis and three Cerrado native species
(Myrcia guyanensis, Miconia chartacea, and Protium brasiliense).
2. The N : P ratio for Miconia was the highest (83 : 1), followed by Myrcia (37 : 1),
Protium (26 : 1) and Eucalyptus (22 : 1). Eucalyptus, Myrcia, and Miconia had
similar amount of tannins (6.00 - 8.16%). The lowest amounts of lignin and cellulose
were presented by Eucalyptus (12.87 and 15.93%).
3. With the exception of Protium, all leaf types were consumed in the food preference
experiments. In laboratory, Eucalyptus was more consumed than Myrcia (0.436 and
0.209 mg mg-1 day-1), while Miconia was consumed on intermediate rates (0.230 mg
mg-1 day-1). In the field, no significant differences were found among leaf types.
4. After 21 days, Phylloicus daily growth rates ranged from 0.08 to 0.14 mg day-1 and
differences were not found among food treatments. Survival of larvae fed on
Eucalyptus (68%) and Miconia (64%) was significantly higher than those fed on
Myrcia (50%) and Protium (32%).
5. Our results suggest that the low quality of food resources available in Cerrado
streams might impose a constraint to shredders consumption that probably reflects
their lower abundance and the slow breakdown rates of native species in these
ecosystems.
Keywords Exotic leaf litter, food preferences, shredders behavior, leaf chemistry,
tropical streams
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
38
Introduction
Allochthonous inputs of leaf litter are the main energy source to aquatic communities
living in shaded headwater streams (Webster & Benfield, 1986; Cummins et al., 1989,
Abelho, 2001). After entering streams, leaves are retained on the streambed and used
as food resource by many invertebrates (Vannote et al., 1980; Wallace & Webster,
1996; Mathuriau et al., 2008). Through their feeding activity, invertebrate shredders
convert part of leaf litter and other coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) into fine
particulate organic matter (FPOM), making it available to other consumers further
downstream (Cummins & Klug, 1979; Wallace & Webster, 1996).
Previous studies concerning the feeding behavior of shredders revealed that
they prefer to feed on leaves that promote higher growth (Arsuffi & Suberkropp,
1986) and survival (Canhoto & Graça, 1995), rejecting the ones that are tough, poor
in nutrients and present high contents of secondary compounds (Graça, 2001; Rincón
& Martínez, 2006; Li & Dudgeon, 2008). It is also known that invertebrate shredders
prefer conditioned leaves, i.e., leaves colonized by aquatic microorganisms, over
unconditioned (Graça et al., 2001). Moreover, Bastian et al. (2008), manipulating the
diversity of shredders and leaf litter in a detritus food web in Australia, suggested that
lowered leaf diversity promotes competitive interactions among shredders.
Riparian zones present a high susceptibility to invasion by exotic species
(Naiman et al., 2005). The invasion of exotic plant species in the riparian vegetation
can alter stream metabolism and invertebrate assemblages by changing the nutritional
resource base into streams (Vitousek, 1990; Going & Dudley, 2008; Moline & Poff,
2008) and habitat structure because exotic species may present different timing of leaf
abscission and decomposition rates (Wallace et al., 1999; Graça et al., 2002;
Thompson & Townsend, 2003). Canhoto & Graça (1995) observed lower
consumption and no growth of the stream detritivore Tipula lateralis (Diptera:
Tipulidae) when feeding on the exotic Eucalyptus globulus in central Portugal.
Reinhart & VandeVoort (2006) suggested that the replacement of the native riparian
species Populus trichocarpa by the exotic Acer platanoides might affect the most
common families of detritivore invertebrates in lotic ecosystems from the United
States.
In Brazil, Eucalyptus trees were first introduced in 1868 (Miritz et al., 2008).
Nowadays, Eucalyptus plantations occupy an area of 6 million of hectares and are one
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
39
of the greatest threats to Cerrado Biome, a biodiversity hotspot in South America
(Myers et al., 2000). Many native areas, including riparian zones, are being deforested
and replaced with Eucalyptus monocultures (Klink & Machado, 2005; Maquere et al.,
2008) to provide wood for a variety of purposes (e.g., charcoal, paper industry,
furniture). However, the consequences of this replacement on terrestrial and aquatic
ecosystems are still poorly understood.
In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of Eucalyptus leaves on
the feeding behavior of a typical shredding caddisfly from Brazilian Cerrado
headwater streams. Through laboratory and field settings, we investigated food
preferences, growth and survival of Phylloicus sp. larvae feeding on leaves of the
exotic Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. and three Cerrado native species (Myrcia
guyanensis Aubl., Miconia chartacea Triana, and Protium brasiliense Engl.). Due to
the low quality of Brazilian Cerrado leaf litter, we hypothesized that Eucalyptus
leaves would be preferred and promote higher growth and survival of Phylloicus
larvae than native species.
Methods
Shredders
The caddisfly used in our experiments, Phylloicus sp. (Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae),
is one of the few invertebrate taxa considered as shredder in Neotropical streams.
Individuals of this genus can be found throughout Americas (Prather, 2003) and have
been used in laboratory experiments evaluating the behavior of tropical shredders (see
Graça et al., 2001; Rincón & Martínez, 2006; Becker et al., 2009; Moretti et al.,
2009). Larvae were collected by hand on several occasions between August and
December 2006 in Taboões (20° 03' 38" S - 44° 03' 03" W), a well-preserved spring
located inside the Serra do Rola Moça State Park, Minas Gerais State, southeastern
Brazil. This spring is surrounded by a native forest (ca. 92 hectares), presenting
diverse woody riparian vegetation that is mainly composed by Cerrado species. Some
tree species characteristic from the transition zone between Cerrado and Atlantic
Forest are also present. Fallen leaves form patches along spring margins all year,
which support a large population of one undetermined species of Phylloicus. More
information and the water properties of Taboões spring can be found in Moretti et al.
(2009).
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
40
After collection, larvae were placed in an isothermic box with spring water
and brought to the laboratory, where they starved for 2 days in an aquarium (80 cm
long, 20 cm wide, 40 cm high) with spring water and a bottom of burnt fine gravel (4h
at 500º C). The aquarium was aerated continuously and maintained under 21 ºC and
12 L : 12 D photoperiod.
Leaves
In all experiments, we used senescent leaves of the four studied species. Leaves of
Myrcia, Miconia, and Protium were chosen because they are abundant in the riparian
zones of Cerrado streams in Minas Gerais State and decompose differently (Moretti et
al., 2007). All leaves were collected at once from plastic nets (1 m2, 10 mm mesh size,
approximately 1.5 m height) implanted in the riparian zone (native species) and in a
monoculture of Eucalyptus located nearby. Leaves were air dried and stored at room
temperature until needed. Before use in the experiments, leaves were conditioned by
incubating in fine mesh bags (0.5 mm mesh size) for 2 weeks in the studied spring.
Initial total nitrogen content of leaves was determined using the Kjeldahl method, and
total phosphorus was measured by the ascorbic acid method (Flindt & Lillebo, 2005).
Nitrogen to phosphorus (N : P) ratios were calculated from dry mass by dividing the
nitrogen fraction (%N) by the phosphorus fraction (%P). Tannins were determined as
tannic acid equivalents by the radial diffusion assay (Graça & Bärlocher, 2005) and
proximate lignin and cellulose contents were determined gravimetrically according to
Gessner (2005). All analyses were done with 4 replicates and differences in leaf
chemical properties were tested using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test, after
arcsine square root transformation (Zar, 1999).
Food preference experiments
We assessed the food preference of Phylloicus larvae using the multiple-choice
approach described by Canhoto et al. (2005). We also tested whether larvae had
consumed similar amounts of each leaf type under laboratory and field conditions. In
laboratory, feeding arenas consisted of plastic cups (12 cm diameter, 9 cm high)
containing burnt fine gravel and 400 ml of filtered spring water. All cups were
maintained under temperature and photoperiod conditions described above and
aerated through pipette tips connected to an aquarium pump. In Taboões, feeding
arenas consisted of PVC pipes (5 cm diameter, 20 cm long) closed with a fine mesh
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
41
(0.5 mm mesh size) on both sides. Pipes were fixed on the spring bottom with a nylon
rope and iron bars.
Phylloicus larvae of similar size (early instars) were visually selected from the
pool of organisms and placed individually in each arena. Food was offered in the form
of leaf discs (1.4 cm diameter). Paired discs were cut from contiguous areas of leaves
with a cork borer, avoiding the major leaf veins. For each arena (replicate), we cut
one pair of each one of the four leaf types. One disc of each pair was used as control
and the other was offered to the shredder. The control discs were placed inside a small
0.5 mm mesh bag and suspended from the rim of the cups or tied close to the pipe
internal surface, such that they were fully submerged but inaccessible to the larvae.
Leaf discs exposed to the larvae were marked with colored pins (one color for each
leaf type). The number of replicates was 80 in laboratory and 80 in the field.
Larvae were allowed to feed until one of the leaf discs was reduced to about
two-thirds of its initial size. This was achieved within 1-4 days, both in laboratory and
field conditions. The leaf material remaining after the feeding period (control and
exposed discs) was dried at 60º C for 72 hours and weighed to the nearest 0.01 mg.
The animals were also dried and weighed. Individual consumption of each leaf type
was expressed in terms of mg of leaf dry mass ingested (difference between the
weight of the control and exposed discs) per individual biomass (mg) over the feeding
period (days).
The first procedure to analyze food preference data was to determine whether
animals had consumed significant amount of each leaf type. For this, we used paired
t-tests to compare the mean weight of exposed leaf discs and the corresponding
control discs (Friberg & Jacobsen, 1994). If differences were not found, larvae had
not consumed significantly that leaf type and it was then removed from further
analyses.
Consumption rates were evaluated by permutation tests according to Bärlocher
(2005). Permutation tests were used because consumers choice is not independent in
multiple-choice experiments (Roa, 1992). These tests are more flexible than standard
tests and do not require normal distribution of data and errors (Bärlocher, 1999). For
each possible pair of leaf types, we calculated differences between the original
consumption values. These differences were shuffled and randomly assigned among
pairs. For each pair of leaf type, the average of shuffled differences was compared
with the average of original differences 10,000 times. The P-value was determined by
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
42
dividing the number of times that the average shuffled differences was larger than the
average of original differences by the number of permutations used. By convention, P
< 0.05 would lead to the rejection of H0 which shows that there is no significant
difference in the consumption of the two leaf types that constitute the pair. We also
used t-tests (independent samples) to determine if there were significant differences in
larvae consumption rates of each leaf type under laboratory and field conditions (Zar,
1999).
Growth and survival experiments
To assess the food value of each studied leaf type, we determined in laboratory
growth and survival of Phylloicus larvae fed on Eucalyptus, Myrcia, Miconia, and
Protium. Larvae selected for these experiments presented initial interocular distance
ranging between 0.54 mm and 1.11 mm. The initial dry mass of each larva was
estimated by relating the interocular distance (mm) to animal dry mass (mg). The
established relationship for this population of Phylloicus was (Becker et al., 2009):
ln DM = 2.50 + 3.84 (ln ID) r2 = 0.71
where ID = interocular distance and DM = animal dry mass. Interocular distance was
measured as the minimum distance between eyes, parallel to head width, with a Zeiss
dissecting microscope fitted with an ocular micrometer (50x magnification).
After acclimatization, larvae were allocated individually to the aerated feeding
arenas described above. Each arena contained 5 discs (1.4 cm diameter) from one of
the four leaf types (treatments). Food, gravel, and filtered spring water were replaced
every week and arenas were maintained under the same temperature (21° C) and
photoperiod conditions (12 L : 12 D). Growth trials were to be maintained until pupal
development was first observed or until other factors made termination necessary.
The final dry mass of each larva was measured directly. Due to limitation in number
of organisms collected per sampling day, we used a randomized block design and
trials were run in 3 blocks across 3 months (one block per month). The same number
of replicates of each food treatment was assigned to each block and, in total, 56
replicates per food treatment were set up.
Larvae daily growth rates (DGR) and specific growth rates (SDGR) were
obtained according to Feio & Graça (2000):
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
43
DGR = (DMf - DMi)/t
SDGR = (DGR/DMi) × 100
where DMi is the initial dry mass, DMf is the final dry mass, and t is the feeding
period (days). The effect of leaf species on larvae growth was analyzed by ANOVA
for Randomized Block Design (Zar, 1999), after checking for normality and
homogeneity of variances (log transformed data). Only larvae surviving until the end
of the experiment were included in analyses.
The feeding arenas were checked every day and survival (% of larvae alive on
each day) was calculated. The logrank test (Hutchings et al., 1991) was used to
compare survivorship of larvae in the four food treatments.
Results
Leaf litter of Eucalyptus, Myrcia, Miconia, and Protium differed in their initial
chemical composition (Table 1). Nitrogen and phosphorus contents varied among leaf
species. Eucalyptus had more than double the nutrient content of Protium, the native
species with the highest nitrogen and phosphorus contents. The N : P ratio for
Miconia was the highest (83 : 1) and differed from the ones presented by Myrcia (37 :
1), Protium (26 : 1), and Eucalyptus (22 : 1). Protium had the lowest amount of
tannins (2.44%) while the other three species presented similar amounts (6.00 -
8.16%). Miconia had the highest amount of lignin (36.23%) and the highest amounts
of cellulose were presented by Protium, Miconia, and Myrcia (26.93 - 23.07%). The
lowest amounts of lignin and cellulose were presented by Eucalyptus (12.87 and
15.93%, respectively; Table 1).
Table 1 Leaf chemistry values for Eucalyptus, Myrcia, Miconia, and Protium (mean ± SE; n = 4), and ANOVA F values.
Litter chemistry Eucalyptus Myrcia Miconia Protium F Nitrogen (%) 1.65 ± 0.03a 0.66 ± 0.02b 0.59 ± 0.01c 0.74 ± 0.01d 656.4* Phosphorus (%) 0.076 ± 0.002a 0.018 ± 0.001b 0.007 ± 0.001c 0.029 ± 0.001d 678.0* Nitrogen : Phosphorus 21.87 ± 0.14a 37.13 ± 0.30a 82.89 ± 2.96b 25.98 ± 0.25a 24.8* Tannins (%) 8.16 ± 1.06a 8.11 ± 0.39a 6.00 ± 0.52a 2.44 ± 0.28b 25.2* Lignin (%) 12.87 ± 0.74a 30.68 ± 1.07b 36.23 ± 0.20c 28.85 ± 1.07b 148.4* Cellulose (%) 15.93 ± 0.59a 23.07 ± 1.16b 23.69 ± 0.49b 26.93 ± 0.97b 31.8*
*P < 0.001. Values sharing superscript letters are not statistically different (P > 0.05).
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
44
In the food preference experiments, Phylloicus mortality rates were low
(approximately 1% in both laboratory and field) and none of the larvae used leaf discs
for case-building. Larvae consumed a significant amount of all studied leaf types with
the exception of Protium (paired t-test, P > 0.05), both under laboratory and field
conditions. In laboratory, discs of Eucalyptus were more consumed than the ones of
Myrcia (Figure 1A; Table 2). Discs of Miconia were consumed on intermediate rates,
not differing from the other two species. In the field, no significant differences were
found in the consumption of Eucalyptus, Myrcia, and Miconia discs (Figure 1B;
Table 2). Consumption rates observed under laboratory and field conditions did not
differ in any leaf type (Table 3).
Fig. 1 Food preferences of Phylloicus larvae exposed to Eucalyptus, Myrcia, Miconia, and Protium in multiple-choice feeding experiments done in laboratory (A) and field (B). Mean ± SE. NC = no consumption. Values sharing superscript letters are not statistically different (P > 0.05).
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
45
Table 2 Analysis of leaf consumption data. Differences between averages of consumption of each possible pair of leaf types and P values of permutation tests.
Difference P Laboratory Field Laboratory Field Eucalyptus - Myrcia +0.227 +0.156 0.047 0.088 Eucalyptus - Miconia +0.206 +0.126 0.117 0.287 Myrcia - Miconia −0.021 −0.029 0.998 0.968
Table 3 Consumption rates (mg mg-1 day-1) of Eucalyptus, Myrcia, and Miconia (mean ± SE) and t-tests results.
Consumption Laboratory Field t df P Eucalyptus 0.436 ± 0.041 0.322 ± 0.042 1.909 156 0.058 Myrcia 0.209 ± 0.036 0.166 ± 0.047 0.702 156 0.484 Miconia 0.230 ± 0.038 0.195 ± 0.030 0.715 156 0.476
The growth experiment was terminated after 21 days when larval mortality in
the Protium food treatment became excessive (68%). Only a few larvae in all food
treatments used available leaf discs for case-building. Phylloicus larvae grew
positively in the four food treatments, with daily growth rates ranging from 0.08 to
0.14 mg day-1 and specific growth rates ranging from 4.76 to 6.83% (Figure 2).
However, none of these growth rates had significant differences among food
treatments (Table 4). At the end of 21 days, 55% of the 224 Phylloicus larvae that
started the experiment died over its course. Survival of larvae fed Eucalyptus and
Miconia was significantly higher than those fed Myrcia and Protium (logrank statistic
> -2.88, P < 0.05; Figure 3). No significant differences were found in larvae survival
within these two groups (logrank statistic < 1.05, P > 0.05).
Table 4 Results from ANOVA for Randomized Block Design of general differences in Phylloicus daily growth rates (DGR) and specific growth rates (SDGR).
Factor SS MS F df P DGR Food treatment 0.03 0.01 1.12 3 0.346 Block 0.58 0.29 31.71 2 < 0.001 Error 0.86 0.01 94
SDGR Food treatment 0.99 0.33 0.50 3 0.684 Block 34.55 17.27 26.16 2 < 0.001 Error 62.06 0.66 94
Data are from Fig. 2
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
46
Fig. 2 Daily growth rates (DGR, A) and specific growth rates (SDGR, B) of Phylloicus larvae fed on Eucalyptus, Myrcia, Miconia, and Protium for 21 days. Mean ± SE.
Fig. 3 Survival (%) of Phylloicus larvae during growth experiments (21 days). , Eucalyptus; , Myrcia; , Miconia; , Protium.
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
47
Discussion
Eucalyptus had the highest nutrient content and was the softest leaf type among those
used. These leaf characteristics were probably responsible for the attractiveness of
this exotic species to Phylloicus. Contrary to our expectations, Eucalyptus discs were
not more consumed than all native leaf types. This suggests that the high levels of
tannins, chemical compounds that decrease leaf palatability to shredders (Canhoto &
Graça, 1999; Graça & Bärlocher, 2005), might have diminished nutrient effects.
Nonetheless, the consumption rates of Eucalyptus observed here contrast with the
ones from other studies that also evaluated the food preferences of shredders in the
presence of Eucalyptus leaves (see Canhoto & Graça, 1995; Yeates & Barmuta, 1999)
and found lower consumption of this leaf species.
The lack of consumption of Protium in the presence of other species with
lower nutrient content and higher tannins concentrations suggests that leaves of this
species may present other defensive compounds that difficult shredders consumption.
In fact, this plant species and other Neotropical species from the family Burseraceae
have leaves with an epicuticular wax and many oil ducts (Watson & Dallwitz, 1992)
that may act as a barrier to microbial colonization and shredder feeding. Recently,
studies done by Rüdiger et al. (2007) demonstrated that some of these leaf oils present
antimicrobial properties. The slowest decomposition rate observed for Protium leaves
in Cerrado streams (k = -0.0020; Moretti et al., 2007) and the low survivorship of
Phylloicus larvae feeding on this species (32% after 21 days) also support this
hypothesis.
Several studies have reported the effects of leaf chemistry and toughness on
shredders feeding (see Graça, 2001). Rincón & Martínez (2006) observed that
Phylloicus sp. larvae from Venezuela preferred to feed on leaves with high nutrient
content and low lignin and polyphenol concentrations. In Hong Kong, Li & Dudgeon
(2008) found that leaf toughness was the primary determinant of feeding and fitness
of Anisocentropus maculatus, a caddisfly from the same family Calamoceratidae. In
the present study, Phylloicus food preferences could not be totally explained by litter
initial chemistry and toughness values (evaluated indirectly as lignin contents). And
this may be partially explained by the high lignin contents and low nutrient quality of
native species, which presented N : P ratios ranging among the highest reported for
leaf litter (see Enriquez et al., 1993; Ostrofsky, 1997). These characteristics prevented
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
48
us to evaluate Phylloicus food preferences using a wide ranking of leaf toughness and
nutritional quality. On the other hand, the majority of Cerrado leaves present similar
characteristics and stream shredders are naturally exposed to this type of leaf litter. As
an adaptation to the low nutrient availability of Savannah-like ecosystems such as the
Brazilian Cerrado, tree species absorb high quantities of nutrients from leaves before
abscission, producing leaf litter of low quality dominated by structural and inhibitory
compounds (Marques et al., 2000; Oliveira & Marquis, 2002).
Phylloicus larvae exhibited similar food preferences in laboratory and field
conditions. The absence of differences between consumption of Eucalyptus and
Myrcia observed in the field trials might have resulted from the entrance of fine
particulate organic matter (FPOM) in the pipes, which served as an alternate food
source to larvae and diminished leaf discs consumption. However, our decision to run
the food preference experiment both in laboratory and field was to confirm if shredder
preferences and consumption rates measured in laboratory were reliable. Given that
no differences were found between consumption rates observed in both conditions for
each leaf type, the applicability of laboratory approach to evaluate the food
preferences of shredders was corroborated in our study.
The stoichiometric theory implies that food quality is relative based on the
nutritional requirements of individual consumers (Cross et al., 2003). Although
having higher nutrient contents, the growth experiments revealed that Eucalyptus was
not a food source of better quality to Phylloicus. Growth rates were highly variable
and no differences were found among food treatments. Similar patterns were observed
by Rincón & Martinez (2006) assessing the growth of Phylloicus sp. when exposed to
the tropical Ficus sp. and Tabebuia rosea leaves. Comparing to the present study,
these authors also found higher specific daily growth rates of Phylloicus larvae,
corroborating the low food value of the leaf species used here. In addition, daily
growth rates measured in our study were almost 3 times lower than the one measured
in a similar experiment, when Phylloicus larvae from this same population fed on
Alnus glutinosa, a fast-decomposing and nitrogen-rich leaf species from temperate
latitudes (M.S. Moretti, unpublished data). Therefore, we believe that larvae growth
in this study was probably limited by nutrients and presence of secondary compounds.
Phylloicus survival percentages were low if compared to shredders from
temperate streams (see Canhoto & Graça, 1995; Going & Dudley, 2008).
Furthermore, survival of larvae fed on Eucalyptus and Miconia was higher than larvae
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
49
fed on Myrcia and Protium, indicating that, among the three preferred leaf types,
Myrcia was the one of worse food quality to larvae. The same leaves used in this
study were also used to assess Phylloicus case-building behavior (Moretti et al.,
2009). Surprisingly, the species that were more used to build cases (Eucalyptus and
Myrcia) were also consumed by larvae. However, Phylloicus selection in that
experiment was related to leaf abundance and phenolic concentrations. Taken
together, the results of both studies confirm the low attractiveness of Protium leaves
in multiple-choice trials, which are not consumed and less used for case-building.
To summarize, our results indicate that Phylloicus feeding is more influenced
by leaf quality than the origin (native/exotic) of the leaves. These findings are in
accordance with other studies that also evaluated the feeding preferences of
invertebrate shredders (Canhoto & Graça, 1995; Going & Dudley, 2008; Li &
Dudgeon, 2008; Moline & Poff, 2008). Additionally, the low quality of food
resources available in Cerrado streams might impose a constraint to shredder
consumption that probably reflects their lower abundance and the slow breakdown
rates of native species in these ecosystems (Gonçalves et al., 2007; Moretti et al
2007). Although our results suggest that Eucalyptus supports similar shredders growth
as native species, the ecological implications of riparian invasion by exotic trees on
natural streams will depend not only on leaf chemistry and invertebrates assimilation
but also on the availability of leaf litter on streams (Moline & Poff, 2008). It is known
that afforestation with Eucalyptus produces changes in stream litter budgets (Graça et
al., 2002; Bañuelos et al., 2004) and, especially in the case of Cerrado streams,
provides a more ephemeral food resource to aquatic communities (J.F. Gonçalves,
unpublished data). Thus, we hypothesize that the replacement of native riparian
forests with Eucalyptus trees would alter food availability to consumers in Cerrado
streams. The assimilation efficiency and survival of Phylloicus larvae during longer
periods feeding on Eucalyptus leaves should also be evaluated to completely
understand the effects of this exotic species on shredders fitness and, consequently,
stream food webs.
Acknowledgements We are grateful to Juliana França and Lurdemar Tavares for
field and laboratory assistance. This research was supported by FAPEMIG, CNPq,
Capes Foundation, Eawag, and US Fish & Wildlife Services. We also thank
COPASA-MG and IEF-MG for logistical facilities and research licenses.
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
50
References
Abelho M. (2001) From litterfall to breakdown in streams: a review. The Scientific
World, 1, 656-680.
Arsuffi T.L. & Suberkropp K. (1986) Growth of two stream caddisflies (Trichoptera)
on leaves colonized by different fungal species. Journal of the North American
Benthological Society, 5, 297-305.
Bañuelos R., Larrañaga S., Elosegi A., Pozo J. (2004) Effects of eucalyptus
plantations on CPOM dynamics in headwater streams: a manipulative approach.
Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 159, 211-228.
Bärlocher F. (1999) Biostatistik. Georg Thieme-Verlag, Stuttgart.
Bärlocher F. (2005) A primer for statistical analysis. In: Methods to study litter
decomposition (Eds. M.A.S. Graça, F. Bärlocher & M.O. Gessner), pp. 313-329.
Springer, Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Bastian M., Pearson R.G. & Boyero L. (2008) Effects of diversity loss on ecosystem
function across trophic levels and ecosystems: A test in a detritus-based tropical
food web. Austral Ecology, 33, 301-306.
Becker B., Moretti M.S. & Callisto M. (2009) Length dry-mass relationships for a
typical shredder in Brazilian streams (Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae). Aquatic
Insects, 31, in press.
Canhoto C. & Graça M.A.S. (1995) Food value of introduced eucalypt leaves for a
Mediterranean stream detritivore: Tipula lateralis. Freshwater Biology, 34, 209-
214.
Canhoto C. & Graça M.A.S. (1999) Leaf barriers to fungal colonization and shredders
(Tipula lateralis) consumption of decomposing Eucalyptus globulus. Microbial
Ecology, 37, 163-172.
Canhoto C., Graça M.A.S. & Bärlocher F. (2005). Feeding preferences. In: Methods
to study litter decomposition (Eds. M.A.S. Graça, F. Bärlocher & M.O. Gessner),
pp. 297-302. Springer, Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Cross W.F., Benstead J.P., Rosemond A.D. & Wallace J.B. (2003) Consumer-
resource stoichiometry in detritus-based streams. Ecology Letters, 6, 721-732.
Cummins K.W. & Klug M.J. (1979) Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annual
Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10, 147-172.
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
51
Cummins K.W., Wilzbach M.A., Gates D.M., Perry J.B. & Taliaferro W.B. (1989)
Shredders and riparian vegetation. Bioscience, 39, 24-30.
Enriquez S., Duarte C.M. & Sandjensen K. (1993) Patterns in decomposition rates
among photosynthetic organisms – the importance of detritus C-N-P content.
Oecologia, 94, 457-471.
Feio M.J. & Graça M.A.S. (2000) Food consumption by the larvae of Sericostoma
vittatum (Trichoptera), an endemic species from the Iberian Peninsula.
Hydrobiologia, 439, 7-11.
Flindt M.R. & Lillebo A.I. (2005) Determination of total nitrogen and phosphorus in
leaf litter. In: Methods to study litter decomposition (Eds. M.A.S. Graça, F.
Bärlocher & M.O. Gessner), pp. 53-59. Springer, Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg,
New York.
Friberg N. & Jacobsen D. (1994) Feeding plasticity of two detritivore-shredders.
Freshwater Biology, 32, 133-142.
Gessner M.O. (2005) Proximate lignin and cellulose. In: Methods to study litter
decomposition (Eds. M.A.S. Graça, F. Bärlocher & M.O. Gessner), pp. 115-120.
Springer, Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Going B.M. & Dudley T.L. (2008) Invasive riparian plant litter alters aquatic insect
growth. Biological Invasions, 10, 1041-1051.
Gonçalves, J.F., Graça M.A.S. & Callisto M. (2007) Litter decomposition in a
Cerrado savannah stream is retarded by leaf toughness, low dissolved nutrients and
a low density of shredders. Freshwater Biology, 52, 1440-1451.
Graça M.A.S. (2001) The role of invertebrates on leaf litter decomposition in streams
– a review. International Review of Hydrobiology, 86, 383-393.
Graça M.A.S. & Bärlocher F. (2005) Radial diffusion assay for tannins. In: Methods
to study litter decomposition (Eds. M.A.S. Graça, F. Bärlocher & M.O. Gessner),
pp. 101-105. Springer, Dordrecht, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Graça M.A.S., Cressa C., Gessner M.O., Feio M.J., Callies K.A. & Barrios C. (2001)
Food quality, feeding preferences, survival and growth of shredders from
temperate and tropical streams. Freshwater Biology, 46, 947-957.
Graça M.A.S., Pozo J. Canhoto C. & Elosegi A. (2002) Effects of Eucalyptus
plantations on detritus, decomposers, and detritivores in streams. The Scientific
World, 2, 1173-1185.
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
52
Hutchings M.J., Booth K.D. & Waite S. (1991) Comparison of survivorship by the
logrank test: criticisms and alternatives. Ecology, 72, 2290-2293.
Klink C.A. & Machado R.B. (2005) Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado.
Conservation Biology, 19, 707-713.
Li A.O.Y. & Dudgeon D. (2008) The effects of leaf litter characteristics on feeding
and fitness of a tropical stream shredder, Anisocentropus maculatus (Trichoptera:
Calamoceratidae). Marine and Freshwater Research, 59, 897-901.
Maquere V., Laclau J.P., Bernoux M., Saint-Andre L., Gonçalves J.L.M., Cerri C.C.,
Piccolo M.C. & Ranger J. (2008) Influence of land use (savanna, pasture,
Eucalyptus plantations) on soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in Brazil. European
Journal of Soil Science, 59, 863-877.
Marques A.R., Garcia Q.S., Resende J.L.P. & Fernandes G.W. (2000) Variations in
leaf characteristics of two species of Miconia in the Brazilian cerrado under
different light intensities. Tropical Ecology, 41, 47-60.
Mathuriau C., Thomas A.G.B. & Chauvet E. (2008) Seasonal dynamics of benthic
detritus and associated macroinvertebrate communities in a neotropical stream.
Fundamental and Applied Limnology, 171, 323-333.
Miritz L.D., Gomes L.S., Noguez M.B. & Palmeira E.M. (2008) Reflorestamento:
mercado interno e externo. Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana, 105, 1-
8.
Moline A.B. & Poff N.L. (2008) Growth of an invertebrate shredder on native
(Populus) and non-native (Tamarix, Elaeagnus) leaf litter. Freshwater Biology, 53,
1012-1020.
Moretti M.S., Gonçalves J.F., Ligeiro R. & Callisto M. (2007) Invertebrates
colonization on native tree leaves in a neotropical stream (Brazil). International
Review of Hydrobiology, 92, 199-210.
Moretti M.S., Loyola R.D., Becker B. & Callisto M. (2009) Leaf abundance and
phenolic concentrations codetermine the selection of case-building materials by
Phylloicus sp. (Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae). Hydrobiologia, 630, 199-206.
Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., Fonseca G.A.B. & Kent J. (2000)
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853-858.
Naiman R.J., Décamps H. & McClain M.E. (2005) Riparia: Ecology, Conservation,
and Management of Streamside Communities. Elsevier Academic Press,
Burlington, San Diego, London.
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
53
Oliveira P.S. & Marquis R.J. (2002) The cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural
History of Neotropical Savanna. Columbia University Press, New York.
Ostrofsky M.L. (1997) Relationship between chemical characteristics of autumn-shed
leaves and aquatic processing rates. Journal of the North American Benthological
Society, 16, 750-759.
Prather A.L. (2003) Revision of the Neotropical caddisfly genus Phylloicus
(Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae). Zootaxa, 275, 1-214.
Reinhart K.O. & VandeVoort R. (2006) Effect of native and exotic leaf litter on
macroinvertebrate communities and decomposition in a western Montana stream.
Diversity and Distributions, 12, 776-781.
Rincón J. & Martínez I. (2006) Food quality and feeding preferences of Phylloicus sp.
(Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae). Journal of the North American Benthological
Society, 25, 209-215.
Roa R. (1992) Design and analysis of multiple-choice feeding-preference
experiments. Oecologia, 89, 509-515.
Rüdiger A.L., Siani A.C. & Veiga, V.F. (2007) The chemistry and pharmacology of
the South America genus Protium Burm. f. (Burseraceae). Pharmacognosy
Reviews, 1, 93-104.
Thompson R.M. & Townsend C.R. (2003) Impacts on stream food webs of native and
exotic forest: an intercontinental comparison. Ecology, 84, 145-161.
Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R. & Cushing C.E. (1980)
The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science,
37, 130-137.
Vitousek P.M. (1990) Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an
integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos, 57, 7-13.
Wallace J.B. & Webster J.R. (1996) The role of macroinvertebrates in stream
ecosystem function. Annual Review of Entomology, 41, 115-139.
Wallace J.B., Eggert S.L., Meyer J.L., Webster J.R. (1999) Effects of resource
limitation in a detrital-based ecosystem. Ecological Monographs, 69, 409-442.
Watson L. & Dallwitz M.J. (1992) The families of flowering plants: descriptions,
illustrations, identification, and information retrieval. Version: November 2008.
http://delta-intkey.com
Webster J.R. & Benfield E.F. (1986) Vascular plant breakdown in freshwater
ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 567-594.
Chapter3:EffectsofEucalyptusonPhylloicusfeeding
54
Yeates L.V. & Barmuta L.A. (1999) The effects of willow and eucalypt leaves on
feeding preference and growth of some Australian aquatic macroinvertebrates.
Australian Journal of Ecology, 24, 593-598.
Zar J.H. (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
4In%luenceoflowqualityleavesonthefeedingactivityoftropicaland
temperateshredders
MarceloS.Moretti1,2,MarcosCallisto1&MarkO.Gessner2,3
1Lab.EcologiadeBentos,InstitutodeCiênciasBiológicas,UniversidadeFederaldeMinasGerais,Av.AntônioCarlos6627,
CP486,30161970,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brasil
2DepartmentofAquaticEcology,Eawag:SwissFederalInstituteofAquaticScienceandTechnology,Ueberlandstrasse133,
8600Dübendorf,Switzerland
3InstituteofIntegrativeBiology,ETHZurich,CHNH68,8092Zürich,Switzerland
Specimens of Phylloicus sp.(Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae) andGammarus pulex (Amphipoda,Gammaridae) sampled in Taboõesspring (Brazil) and Chriesbachstream(Switzerland),respectively.
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
56
Influence of low quality leaves on the feeding activity of
tropical and temperate shredders
Marcelo S. Moretti, Marcos Callisto & Mark O. Gessner
Abstract We hypothesized that shredders activity in Brazilian Cerrado streams is
restricted by the quality of available leaves. Thus, we tested whether shredders from
tropical (Phylloicus sp.) and temperate (Gammarus pulex) streams would exhibit
similar food preferences, and whether low quality leaf diets would affect shredders
consumption and survivorship similarly. Leaves were chosen such that we had two
pairs composed by one tropical and one temperate leaf species each, presenting low
lignin and N contents (Swietenia macrophylla and Betula pubescens) and high lignin
and moderate N contents (Hymenaea courbaril and Fagus sylvatica). Phylloicus and
Gammarus exhibited similar food preferences. Betula was the most consumed leaf
species (Phylloicus: 0.11 to 0.17 mg mg-1 day-1; Gammarus: 0.14 to 0.22 mg mg-1
day-1) while Hymenaea was not consumed. Fagus and Swietenia were little consumed
by Gammarus (0.02 and 0.01 mg mg-1 day-1, respectively) and Phylloicus preferred
none of these leaf species. According to shredders preference, leaf species were
ranked as follow: Betula > Swietenia = Fagus > Hymenaea. Consumption rates of
both shredders were affected by leaf species. Phylloicus consumed more Swietenia
than the other 3 leaf species while Gammarus consumed more Swietenia and Betula
than Hymenaea and Fagus. After 4 weeks, Phylloicus survivorship was extremely low
(9% across all treatments) and larvae fed on Betula survived more than those fed on
Hymenaea. Gammarus survival was much higher than Phylloicus (80%) and no
differences were found among food treatments. Our results suggest that the low
abundance of effective shredders in Brazilian Cerrado streams is probably more
linked to the low quality of leaves than a different behavior exhibited by these
invertebrates.
Keywords Leaf chemistry, food preferences, Phylloicus sp., Gammarus pulex,
Brazilian Cerrado streams.
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
57
Introduction
Shredders are the functional feeding group of invertebrates whose mouthparts allow
them to consume leaf litter effectively (Cummins & Klug 1979). Therefore,
individuals of this group perform a key role in the energetics of shaded streams,
where leaf allochthonous inputs constitute the main source of organic matter (Petersen
& Cummins 1974, Webster & Benfield 1986). Shredders activity produces leaf
fragments and fecal pellets, which can be subsequently used as food by other
functional feeding groups (Heard & Richardson 1995, Wallace and Webster 1996,
Hieber & Gessner 2002, Jonsson & Malmqvist 2005).
Studies done in temperate streams demonstrated that shredders abundance or
biomass is positively related to leaf litter breakdown rates (Sponseller & Benfield
2001, Hagen et al. 2006). Additionally, consumption of leaf litter by shredders might
vary in response to litter availability (Cummins et al. 1989), leaf chemistry (Irons et al.
1988, Campbell & Fuchshuber 1995) and microbial conditioning (Graça et al. 1993,
Rong et al. 1995). In this sense, the chemical attributes of leaf species (e.g., C:N or
lignin:N) may influence shredders feeding and resource use in these ecosystems
(Ostrofsky 1997, Swan & Palmer 2006). Contrasting with all existing knowledge
about the feeding behavior of shredders at higher latitudes, few studies concerning
this issue were done in the tropics. Nonetheless, there is evidence that tropical
shredders exhibit the same basic patterns of food exploitation as their temperate
counterparts (Graça et al. 2001, Rincón & Martinez 2006, Li & Dudgeon 2008).
Brazilian Cerrado leaf species are known for presenting high toughness and
contents of inhibitory compounds (Oliveira & Marquis 2002, Moretti et al. 2009).
Moreover, these leaves also present lower nutrient content if compared to leaves from
temperate zones (Gonçalves et al. 2007, Moretti et al. 2007). All these characteristics,
associated with a low seasonality on leaf fall (Gonçalves et al. 2006), result in a
diversity of litter types varying in food quality that may affect shredders consumption
(Irons et al. 1988, Bastian et al. 2007, Jacobsen et al. 2008, Li & Dudgeon 2008).
We hypothesized that the activity of shredders in Brazilian Cerrado streams is
restricted by the quality of available leaves. In order to evaluate how low quality
leaves affect the activity of shredders from tropical and temperate streams, we
determined food preferences, consumption rates, FPOM production and survival of
Phylloicus sp. Müller and Gammarus pulex L. exposed to four leaf species commonly
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
58
found in Brazilian Cerrado and European deciduous forests. These leaf species were
chosen in such a way that we had two pairs, each composed by one tropical and one
temperate species presenting identical lignin and similar N contents. Specifically, we
tested whether Phylloicus and Gammarus would exhibit similar food preferences
among leaves of different quality, and whether low quality leaf diets would affect the
consumption and survivorship of both shredders similarly.
Methods
Shredders
The tropical Phylloicus sp. (Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae) and the temperate
Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda: Gammaridae) are common leaf-shredding detritivores
that inhabit small streams in south east Brazil and north east Switzerland, respectively
(Kelly et al. 2002, Dangles et al. 2004, Becker et al. 2009). Phylloicus live in pools,
and can be found where fallen leaves form patches that can be used as food source
and material to build their cases (Prather 2003). Gammarus are normally found in
high abundances associated to macrophytes in rapid and pool reaches. Individuals of
Phylloicus larvae were collected in Taboões spring, located inside the Rola Moça
State Park, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (20° 03’ 38” S - 44° 03’ 03” W) and
Gammarus were collected in Chriesbach stream at Dübendorf, Switzerland (47° 24’
22” N - 08° 35’ 49” O). Taboões spring present leaf patches on the streambed during
all year and waters are well oxygenated, alkaline with low conductivity and nutrient
concentrations (Moretti et al. 2009). Chriesbach is a macrophyte-rich stream of the
Swiss Plateau that presents high levels of major nutrients (N, P). The catchment of the
Chriesbach mainly consists of agricultural, industrial and residential areas (Kaenel et
al. 2000). After collection, individuals were immediately brought to the laboratory
and acclimatized in an aerated aquarium for 2 days (Phylloicus: 21º C, 12L : 12D
photoperiod; Gammarus: 17º C, 16L : 8D photoperiod).
Leaves
Senescent leaves of the tropical Swietenia macrophylla King and Hymenaea courbaril
L. were collected at once in the campus of Federal University of Minas Gerais (Belo
Horizonte, Brazil) on August 2007 while leaves of the temperate Betula pubescens
Ehrh. and Fagus sylvatica L. were collected on November 2007 from single trees
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
59
located near Chriesbach stream. These leaf species were chosen in such a way that we
had a pair composed by one tropical and one temperate species with high lignin and
low nitrogen contents. A second pair of tropical and temperate species had moderately
low lignin content and similar nitrogen content. All leaves were conditioned for 7
days in fine mesh bags (mesh size: 0.5 mm) in the respective streams before offering
to shredders.
Some leaves of the four studied species were ground for leaf initial chemistry
determination. Total N content of ~5-mg subsamples was determined with a CHNS-
Analyzer (EuroEA 3000; EuroVector S.p.A., Milan, Italy). P was determined on ~5-
mg subsamples as soluble reactive P after digestion with K2S2O8 in an autoclave at
121º C (Ebina et al. 1983). Lignin was measured gravimetrically (~250-mg
subsamples) as acid detergent lignin (Gessner 2005) while tannins were determined
on ~100-mg subsamples as tannic acid equivalents by the radial diffusion assay
(Graça & Bärlocher 2005).
Fungal biomass was analyzed from conditioned leaves. Ten leaf discs (1.4 cm
diameter) were cut from 5 different leaves of each species (2 discs per leaf) using a
cork borer. One set of 5 discs was placed in a small plastic bag and frozen at -20 ºC
for ergosterol analysis to provide an estimate of fungal biomass. Leaf ergosterol
content was quantified according to Gessner & Schmitt (1996) and converted to
fungal biomass based on an average ergosterol content of 5.5 mg per g fungal dry
mass (Gessner & Chauvet 1993). The second set of leaf discs was placed in a separate
aluminum pan, and dried to constant mass at 60 ºC for 72 h, before weighing to the
nearest 0.01 mg. Leaf chemical characteristics and fungal biomass were compared
among leaf species by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test (after arcsine
square root transformation).
Food preference experiments
A total of 120 individuals of similar size of each shredder (Phylloicus: 6.53 ± 0.42 mg;
Gammarus: 3.28 ± 0.17 mg; body weight ± SE) were individually placed in plastic
containers (Phylloicus: 12 cm diameter × 9 cm high; Gammarus: 10 × 10 × 12 cm
high), containing 400 ml of filtered spring water, which were aerated continuously
and kept under temperature and light conditions described above. To evaluate food
preferences, we adopted an experimental design similar to the one used by Graça et al.
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
60
(2001). Shredders (containers) were randomly distributed among 6 treatments, each
composed by pairs of the four studied leaf species: Swietenia, Hymenaea, Betula and
Fagus.
Food was offered in the form of leaf discs (1.4 cm diameter). Pairs of leaf
discs were cut from the same leaf using a cork borer (one from each side of the main
vein). The control discs were placed inside a small 0.5 mm mesh bag and suspended
from the rim of the containers, while exposed discs were pierced with colored pins
(one color for each species) and offered to shredders. The number of replicates for
each shredder in each pairwise comparison was 20. Shredders were allowed to feed
until one of the exposed leaf discs was reduced to about one-third of its initial size.
After the feeding period, shredders, control and exposed discs were placed in separate
aluminum pans, dried to constant mass at 60 °C for 72 h and weighed to the nearest
0.01 mg. Food consumption was expressed in terms of mg of leaf dry mass ingested
(difference between control and exposed discs) per individual biomass (mg) over the
feeding period (days).
Data analysis was done according to Petersen & Renauld (1989) and Friberg
& Jacobsen (1994). Firstly, we determined whether shredders had consumed a
significant amount of leaves during the experiment. Paired t-tests were used to
compare the average weight of exposed and control discs of each species.
Consumption was considered to have occurred when at least one of the two leaf discs
exposed to a shredder was significantly lower than that of the corresponding control
disc. Once consumption had occurred, the next procedure was to test, again by paired
t-tests, whether one of the two offered food items was significantly more consumed,
that is preferred.
Consumption and survival experiments
We evaluated consumption rates, FPOM production and survival of Phylloicus and
Gammarus fed on Swietenia, Hymenaea, Betula and Fagus. Eighty animals of each
shredder were used in these experiments (20 per food treatment). The average initial
body weight (± SE) for Phylloicus was 2.19 ± 0.10 mg and for Gammarus was 2.56 ±
0.12 mg. After the acclimatization period, animals were placed individually in the
aerated plastic containers described above. Two conditioned leaf discs (1.4 cm
diameter) of one food treatment were offered in each container and animals were
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
61
allowed to feed ad libitum for 4 weeks. Leaf discs and water were replaced every
week.
Remaining leaf discs were placed individually in aluminum pans and dried to
constant mass at 60 ºC for 72 h, before weighing to the nearest 0.01 mg. Food
consumption was determined weekly by the difference between initial and final dry
mass of offered discs. Leaf discs initial dry mass was estimated by a conversion factor
wet mass/oven dry mass calculated previously for each studied leaf species. Control
replicates were set to determine discs mass loses in the absence of shredders and
correct leaf consumption values. Consumption rates were determined by the amount
of food ingested (mg) per individual biomass (mg) over the feeding period (days).
The total amount of FPOM produced by each shredder was filtered onto preweighed
0.45-µm glass microfiber filters (Grade GF/F, Whatman Ltd.). Filters were dried at 60
ºC for 72 h and reweighed to the nearest 0.01 mg to determine the FPOM production
(mg mg-1 day-1). The effect of leaf species on shredders consumption and FPOM
production was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test, after
checking for normality and homogeneity of variances (square-root transformed data).
Replicates were checked daily and the percentage of animals alive on each day
was calculated. Dead animals and respective containers were removed from the
experiments. The logrank test (Hutchings et al. 1991) was used to compare
survivorship of shredders in the four food treatments. The number of Phylloicus
larvae that had used leaf discs as material for case-building was also recorded.
Because Phylloicus presented high mortality in all food treatments, the relationship
between leaf consumption, and FPOM production (independent variables) to insect
survivorship (dependent variable) was examined with simple linear regressions
followed by residual analysis. All statistical analyses were done with SPSS (version
16.0 for Macintosh, SPSS, Chicago, Illinois) and based on Zar (1999).
Results
Studied leaf species differed in their chemistry (Table 1). Hymenaea presented the
highest N content (0.86%) while Betula and Swietenia had the lowest contents (0.56
and 0.52%, respectively). The P content of Betula was more than 10 times higher than
the one of Hymenaea (0.037%), the species that had the second high content of this
nutrient. Fagus and Hymenaea had higher lignin contents (24.48 and 25.92%) than
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
62
Betula and Swietenia (15.52 and 15.29%). Tannin contents were higher in Swietenia
(6.63%) than in Betula and Hymenaea (2.72 and 3.33%, Table 1). After conditioning
for one week, Betula leaves were more colonized by aquatic fungi (F = 8.190, P =
0.015, df = 3) than Swietenia and Fagus, while Hymenaea presented intermediate
levels of fungal biomass (Fig. 1).
Table 1 Leaf chemistry values for Swietenia, Hymenaea, Betula and Fagus (mean ± SE; n = 4), and ANOVA F values.
Litter chemistry Swietenia Hymenaea Betula Fagus F Nitrogen (%) 0.52 ± 0.01a 0.86 ± 0.01b 0.56 ± 0.02a 0.62 ± 0.01c 133.99* Phosphorus (%) 0.014 ± 0.001a 0.037 ± 0.001b 0.383 ± 0.020c 0.017 ± 0.001a 821.65* Lignin (%) 15.29 ± 0.21a 25.92 ± 1.16b 15.52 ± 0.53a 24.48 ± 0.24b 84.95* Tannins (%) 6.63 ± 0.76a 3.33 ± 0.32b 2.72 ± 0.15b 4.51 ± 0.52a,b 14.02*
*P < 0.001. Values sharing superscript letters are not statistically different (P > 0.05).
Fig. 1 Fungal biomass of each leaf species after 7 days of incubation in Chriesbach stream (mean ± SE, n = 4).
Food preference experiments lasted 3 weeks for Phylloicus and 5 weeks for
Gammarus. Mortality rates were relatively low (Phylloicus: 12%; Gammarus: 18%)
and none of Phylloicus larvae used exposed discs for case-building. Consumption of
Betula discs was fast by both shredders and all replicates containing this leaf species
were stopped in the first week. Phylloicus and Gammarus exhibited similar food
preferences (Fig. 2). Betula was the most consumed leaf species (Phylloicus: 0.11 to
0.17 mg mg-1 day-1; Gammarus: 0.14 to 0.22 mg mg-1 day-1) and none of the other 3
leaf species were consumed in its presence. Hymenaea was not consumed in any
treatment (t-test < 0.155, P > 0.616). Fagus and Swietenia were little consumed by
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
63
Gammarus (0.02 and 0.01 mg mg-1 day-1, respectively) and Phylloicus did not differ
between these leaf species (t-test = -1.361, P = 0.190, Fig. 2). The pairwise treatment
containing Swietenia and Fagus was the only one that differed qualitatively between
Phylloicus and Gammarus. According to shredders preference, leaf species were
ranked as follow: Betula > Swietenia = Fagus > Hymenaea.
Fig. 2 Food preferences of Phylloicus (empty bars) and Gammarus (filled bars) when exposed to four leaf species as tested pairwise. Mean ± SE. NC = no consumption. Values sharing superscript letters are not statistically different (P > 0.05).
During the consumption and survival experiments, 25% of Phylloicus larvae
used leaf discs for case-building. Hymenaea and Fagus were the most used species
for this purpose (10 and 8 replicates, respectively). These experiments revealed that,
except for replicates containing Betula, Phylloicus presented higher consumption
rates than Gammarus (Fig. 3A). However, the consumption rates of both shredders
were affected by leaf species (Table 2). Phylloicus consumed more Swietenia than the
other 3 leaf species while Gammarus consumed more Swietenia and Betula than
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
64
Hymenaea and Fagus. Shredders FPOM production presented similar patterns (Fig.
3B; Table 2). Values of FPOM production were higher in Swietenia and Betula than
in Hymenaea treatments. When feeding on Fagus, Phylloicus produced intermediate
amounts of FPOM, not differing from other food treatments, and Gammarus
produced the lowest amounts.
Fig. 3 Consumption rates (A) and FPOM production (B) of Phylloicus and Gammarus fed on Swietenia, Hymenaea, Betula and Fagus during 4 weeks. Mean ± SE. Values sharing superscript letters are not statistically different (P > 0.05).
Table 2 Results from one-way ANOVAs of general differences in shredders consumption rates and FPOM production among food treatments. Shredder species SS MS F df P Consumption Phylloicus 2.317 0.772 14.884 3 <0.001 Gammarus 2.084 0.695 67.452 3 <0.001 FPOM Phylloicus 0.995 0.332 8.801 3 <0.001 Gammarus 0.892 0.297 40.251 3 <0.001
Data are from Fig. 3
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
65
Phylloicus survivorship was extremely low with only 9% of larvae remaining
alive after 4 weeks (across all food treatments). Survival percentages of larvae fed on
Betula were higher but differences were only found between Betula and Hymenaea
food treatments (logrank statistic = -2.695, P = 0.007; Fig 4A). Phylloicus
survivorship was positively related to leaf consumption and FPOM production
(consumption: F = 79.253, R2 = 0.504, P < 0.001; FPOM: F = 43.979, R2 = 0.361, P <
0.001). Gammarus survival was much higher than Phylloicus (80% across all food
treatments) and no differences were found among food treatments (logrank statistic <
0.412, P > 0.112; Fig 4B).
Fig. 4 Survival (%) of Phylloicus (A) and Gammarus (B) during 4 weeks. , Swietenia; , Hymenaea; , Betula; , Fagus.
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
66
Discussion
Our experiments revealed that Phylloicus and Gammarus have similar preferences
when selecting among food resources. When given a choice, both shredders preferred
Betula, the leaf species that presented the highest P content, and rejected Hymenaea
that, together with Fagus, had the highest lignin contents. The low consumption of
Swietenia is probably related to its tannins content, which was higher than in Betula.
These results are in agreement with what was previously observed by other studies
that assessed the feeding preferences of shredders (e.g., Canhoto & Graça 1995,
Motomori et al. 2001, Rincón & Martínez 2006) and give more evidences that tropical
shredders are also able to distinguish among different leaf species as their temperate
counterparts.
Excepting Hymenaea, shredders feeding preferences were in accordance with
the values of fungal colonization. The low biomass of fungi associated to Swietenia
and Fagus after conditioning might be due to the chemistry of these species (Gessner
& Chauvet 1994, Royer & Minshall 2001), which presented lower P contents.
Because fungal colonization affects the nutritional value and palatability of decaying
leaves to shredders (Arsuffi & Suberkropp 1986, Graça et al. 1993, Graça et al. 2001),
these results suggest that Betula was the leaf type of better quality in these
experiments. In addition, the lack of consumption of Hymenaea, which also presented
high levels of N and fungal biomass, by both shredders in any pairwise treatment, is
probably related to its leaf anatomy and chemistry. As a result of the scleromorphic
aspect of Cerrado vegetation, Hymenaea leaves have a high density of veins and also
present a thick epicuticular wax layer and many secondary compounds (Sugayama &
Salatino 1995) that difficult consumption by herbivores (Welker et al. 2007). And
these characteristics might have diminished the attractiveness of this species to
shredders.
The food preference experiments showed that leaf consumption of Phylloicus
and Gammarus was not related with leaf N contents, indicating that possible N effects
on shredders preference were minimized by other factors, such as lignin contents and
presence of secondary compounds. These findings corroborate the studies of Albariño
& Balseiro (2001) and Li & Dudgeon (2008, 2009). Furthermore, because both
shredders had similar food preferences, our results suggest that leaf quality was more
important than the origin of leaf species in determining shredders choices. The lack of
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
67
association between shredders and native leaves, i.e., leaves they are normally
exposed to in their natural habitats, was also documented by previews studies (see
Parkyn & Winterbourn 1997, Yeates & Barmuta 1999, Li & Dudgeon 2008).
The observed consumption rates demonstrated that the feeding activity of both
shredders was deterred by the high lignin content present in Hymenaea and Fagus
leaves. Despite being considered as a highly opportunistic consumer (Cummins &
Klug 1979, Kelly et al. 2002), our results suggest that Gammarus was more affected
by this leaf structural compound, while Phylloicus consumption rates did not differ
among Hymenaea, Betula and Fagus food treatments. However, the results of FPOM
production, which was mainly composed by fecal pellets, indicate that Hymenaea was
the leaf species that most affected the feeding activity of this tropical shredder. On the
other hand, the higher consumption rates observed for Phylloicus feeding on
Swietenia suggest that these larvae exhibited compensatory feeding (Cruz-Rivera &
Hay 2000). According to Simpson & Simpson (1990), when environmental
constraints confine consumers to lower quality diets, they may still obtain sufficient
nutrients, if they can compensate by increasing their consumption rate. Moreover,
compensatory feeding is likely to be an advantage in environments where food
sources vary seasonally or in an unpredictable way (Graça et al. 2001) and lowers
susceptibility to predation by reducing consumers movement among different food
resources (Stachowicz & Hay 1996).
Although presenting higher consumption rates in all food treatments but
Betula, Phylloicus survivorship was much lower than Gammarus in our experiments.
The effect of leaf species on shredders survivorship was only observed in Phylloicus
trials, where larvae fed on Betula survived more than those fed on Hymenaea. As far
as we know, Phylloicus survival percentages observed in the present study are among
the lowest recorded for shredders in laboratory experiments (see Canhoto & Graça
1995, Cruz-Rivera & Hay 2000, Graça et al. 2001, Li & Dudgeon 2008). We have
two possible reasons for the low survivorship of Phylloicus. First, the low quality of
leaves used in this experiment, which might have constituted resources of low food
value for this shredder. Second, the small size of larvae used, which could have had
more difficult to break down tough leaf discs (Nolen & Pearson 1993, Wantzen &
Wagner 2006). Analysis of gut contents revealed that larvae from all food treatments
were not starving when they died (M.S. Moretti, personal observation). Additionally,
Phylloicus survivorship was positively related with consumption rates and FPOM
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
68
production, indicating that these two variables partially explained larvae survivorship
(R2 = 0.504 and 0.361, respectively). Thus, we have evidences to believe that leaf
quality is the most likely reason. Given that waters in Taboões are not so rich in
nutrients as in Chriesbach stream, leaves conditioned in this spring were probably less
colonized by fungi (Chung & Suberkropp 2008) and presented lower food quality
when offered to Phylloicus. Furthermore, the high survivorship of Gammarus in all
food treatments suggests that this shredder species might have a better strategy than
Phylloicus to deal with low quality food resources. In fact, Graça et al. (1993)
demonstrated that G. pulex has the ability to compensate for lower food quality by
adjusting its respiration rate.
In conclusion, our results suggest that tropical and temperate shredders have
very similar food preferences when exposed to leaves of different quality, and that
their activity is mainly affected by the presence of structural compounds (e.g., lignin)
when exposed to low quality leaf litter. These findings corroborate our hypothesis,
and indicate that the low abundance of effective shredders in Brazilian Cerrado
streams is probably more linked to the low quality of leaves than a different behavior
exhibited by these invertebrates. Taking into account that tropical forests present a
high diversity of leaf species, and shredders activity is influenced by leaf availability
and quality, we believe that the abundance and importance of invertebrate shredders
on ecological processes in tropical streams, such as leaf litter breakdown, is more
related to local characteristics that determine plant species composition in the riparian
forests (e.g., altitude, vegetation type, and climate) than generalized latitudinal
patterns.
Acknowledgements We thank Richard Illi and the AuA Laboratory at Eawag for
providing nutrient analysis data. We also thank Barbara Becker, Nayara Costa,
Deborah Oliveira, and Clarissa Dantas for laboratory and field assistance. This study
was supported by CAPES Foundation, Eawag, CNPq, FAPEMIG, and US Fish &
Wildlife Services. We also thank COPASA-MG and IEF-MG for logistical facilities
and research licenses.
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
69
References
Albariño, R. J. & Balseiro, E. G., 2001: Food quality, larval consumption, and growth
of Klapopteryx kuschell (Plecoptera: Austroperlidae) from a south Andes stream. –
Journal of Freshwater Ecology 16: 517-526.
Arsuffi, T. L. & Suberkropp, K., 1986: Growth of two stream caddisflies (Trichoptera)
on leaves colonized by different fungal species. – Journal of the North American
Bethological Society 5: 297-305.
Bastian, M., Boyero, L., Jackes, B. R. & Pearson, R. G., 2007: Leaf litter diversity
and shredder preferences in an Australian tropical rain-forest stream. – Journal of
Tropical Ecology 23: 219-229.
Becker, B., Moretti, M. S. & Callisto, M., 2009: Length dry-mass relationships for a
typical shredder in Brazilian streams (Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae). – Aquatic
Insects 31: in press.
Campbell, I. C. & Fuchshuber, L., 1995: Polyphenols, condensed tannins, and
processing rates of tropical and temperate leaves in an Australian stream. – Journal
of the North American Bethological Society 14: 174-182.
Canhoto, C. & Graça M. A. S., 1995: Food value of introduced eucalypt leaves for a
Mediterranean stream detritivore: Tipula lateralis. – Freshwater Biology 34: 209-
214.
Chung, N. & Suberkropp, K., 2008: Influence of shredder feeding and nutrients on
fungal activity and community structure in headwater streams. – Fundamental and
Applied Limnology 173: 35-46.
Cruz-Rivera, E. & Hay, M. E., 2000: Can quantity replace quality? Food choice,
compensatory feeding, and fitness of marine mesograzers. – Ecology 81: 201-219.
Cummins, K. W. & Klug, M. J., 1979: Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. –
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 147-172.
Cummins, K. W., Wilzbach, M. A., Gates, D. M., Perry, J. B. & Taliaferro, W. B.,
1989: Shredders and riparian vegetation. – Bioscience 39: 24-30.
Dangles, O., Gessner, M. O., Guérold, F. & Chauvet, E., 2004: Impacts of stream
acidification on litter breakdown: implications for assessing ecosystem functioning.
– Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 365-375.
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
70
Ebina, L., Tsutsui, T. & Shirai, T., 1983: Simultaneous determination of total nitrogen
and total phosphorus in water using peroxodisulfate oxidation. – Water Research
17: 1721-1726.
Friberg, N. & Jacobsen, D., 1994: Feeding plasticity of two detritivore-shredders. –
Freshwater Biology 32: 133-142.
Gessner, M. O., 2005: Proximate lignin and cellulose. – In: Graça, M. A. S.,
Bärlocher, F. & Gessner, M. O. (eds): Methods to study litter decomposition. –
Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 115-120.
Gessner, M. O. & Chauvet, E., 1993: Ergosterol-to-biomass conversion factors for
aquatic hyphomycetes. – Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59: 502-507.
Gessner, M. O. & Chauvet, E., 1994: Importance of stream microfungi in controlling
breakdown rates of leaf litter. – Ecology 75: 1807-1817.
Gessner, M. O. & Schmitt, A. L., 1996: Use of solid-phase extraction to determine
ergosterol concentrations in plant tissue colonized by fungi. – Applied and
Environmental Microbiology 62: 415-419.
Gonçalves, J. F., França, J. S. & Callisto, M., 2006: Dynamics of allochthonous
organic matter in a tropical Brazilian headstream. – Brazilian Archives of Biology
and Biotechnology 49: 967-973.
Gonçalves, J. F., Graça, M. A. S. & Callisto, M., 2007: Litter decomposition in a
Cerrado savannah stream is retarded by leaf toughness, low dissolved nutrients and
a low density of shredders. – Freshwater Biology 52: 1440-1451.
Graça, M. A. S. & Bärlocher, F., 2005: Radial diffusion assay for tannins. – In: Graça,
M. A. S., Bärlocher, F. & Gessner, M. O. (eds): Methods to study litter
decomposition. – Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 101-105.
Graça, M. A. S., Maltby, S. L. & Calow, P., 1993: Importance of fungi in the diet of
Gammarus pulex and Asellus aquaticus: II. Effects on growth, reproduction and
physiology. – Oecologia 96: 304-309.
Graça, M. A. S., Cressa, C., Gessner, M. O., Feio, M. J., Callies, K. A. & Barrios, C.,
2001: Food quality, feeding preferences, survival and growth of shredders from
temperate and tropical streams. – Freshwater Biology 46: 947-957.
Hagen, E. M., Webster, J. R. & Benfield, E. F., 2006: Are leaf breakdown rates a
useful measure of stream integrity along an agricultural landuse gradient? –
Journal of the North American Benthological Society 25: 330-343.
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
71
Heard, S. B. & Richardson, J. S., 1995: Shredder-collector facilitation in stream
detrital food webs: is there enough evidence? – Oikos 72: 359-366.
Hieber, M. & Gessner, M. O., 2002: Contribution of stream detritivores, fungi, and
bacteria to leaf breakdown based on biomass estimates. – Ecology 83: 1026-1038.
Hutchings, M. J., Booth, K. D. & Waite, S., 1991: Comparison of survivorship by the
logrank test: criticisms and alternatives. – Ecology 72: 2290-2293.
Irons, J. G., Oswood, M. W. & Bryant, J. P., 1988: Consumption of leaf detritus by a
stream shredder: influence of tree species and nutrient status. – Hydrobiologia 160:
53-61.
Jacobsen, D., Cressa, C., Mathooko, J. M. & Dudgeon, D., 2008: Macroinvertebrates:
composition, life histories and production. – In: Dudgeon, D. (ed): Tropical stream
ecology. – Academic Press, Burlington, pp. 65-105.
Jonsson, M. & Malmqvist, B., 2005: Species richness and composition effects in a
detrital processing chain. – Journal of the North American Benthological Society
24: 798-806.
Kaenel, B. R., Buehrer, H. & Uehlinger, U., 2000: Effects of aquatic plant
management on stream metabolism and oxygen balance in streams. – Freshwater
Biology 45: 85-95.
Kelly, D. W., Dick, J. T. A. & Montgomery, W. I., 2002: The functional role of
Gammarus (Crustacea, Amphipoda): shredders, predators, or both? –
Hydrobiologia 485: 199-203.
Li, A. O. Y. & Dudgeon, D., 2008: The effects of leaf litter characteristics on feeding
and fitness of a tropical stream shredder, Anisocentropus maculatus (Trichoptera:
Calamoceratidae). – Marine and Freshwater Research 59: 897-901.
Li, A. O. Y. & Dudgeon, D., 2009: Shredders: species richness, abundance, and role
in litter breakdown in tropical Hong Kong streams. – Journal of the North
American Benthological Society 28: 167-180.
Moretti, M. S., Gonçalves, J. F., Ligeiro, R. & Callisto, M., 2007: Invertebrates
colonization on native tree leaves in a neotropical stream (Brazil). – International
Review of Hydrobiology 92: 199-210.
Moretti, M. S., Loyola, R. D., Becker, B. & Callisto, M., 2009: Leaf abundance and
phenolic concentrations codetermine the selection of case-building materials by
Phylloicus sp. (Trichoptera, Calamoceratidae). – Hydrobiologia 630: 199-206.
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
72
Motomori, K., Mitsuhashi, H. & Nakano, S., 2001: Influence of leaf litter quality on
the colonization and consumption of stream invertebrate shredders. – Ecological
Research 16: 173-182.
Nolen, J. & Pearson, R. G., 1993: Factors affecting litter processing by
Anysocentropus kirrhamus (Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae) from an Australian
tropical forest stream. – Freshwater Biology 19: 469-479.
Oliveira, P. S. & Marquis, R. J., 2002: The cerrados of Brazil: Ecology and Natural
History of Neotropical Savanna. – Columbia University Press, New York.
Ostrofsky, M. L., 1997: Relationship between chemical characteristics of autumm-
shed leaves and aquatic processing rates. – Journal of the North American
Benthological Society 16: 750-759.
Parkyn, S. M. & Winterbourn, M. J., 1997: Leaf breakdown and colonization by
invertebrates in a headwater stream: comparisons of native and introduced tree
species. – New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 31: 301-312.
Petersen, R. C. & Cummins, K. W., 1974: Leaf processing in a woodland stream. –
Freshwater Biology 4: 343-368.
Petersen, C. H. & Renauld, P. E., 1989: Analysis of feeding preference experiments. –
Oecologia 80: 82-86.
Prather, A. L., 2003: Revision of the Neotropical caddisfly genus Phylloicus
(Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae). – Zootaxa 275: 1-214.
Rincón, J. & Martínez, I., 2006: Food quality and feeding preferences of Phylloicus
sp. (Trichoptera: Calamoceratidae). – Journal of the North American Benthological
Society 25: 209-215.
Rong. Q., Sridhar, K. R. & Bärlocher, F., 1995: Food selection in three leaf-shredding
stream invertebrates. – Hydrobiologia 316: 173-181.
Royer, T. V. & Minshall, G. W., 2001: Effects of nutrient enrichment and leaf quality
on the breakdown of leaves in a hardwater stream. – Freshwater Biology 46: 603-
610.
Simpson, S. J. & Simpson, C. L., 1990: The mechanisms of nutritional compensation
by phytophagous insects. – In: Bernays, E. A. (ed): Insect-plant interactions.
Volume 2. – CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 111-160.
Sponseller, R. A. & Benfield E. F., 2001: Influences of land-use on leaf breakdown in
southern Appalachian headwater streams: a multiple-scale analysis. – Journal of
the North American Benthological Society 20: 44-59.
Chapter4:FeedingactivityofPhylloicusandGammarus
73
Sugayama, R. L. & Salatino, A., 1995: Influence of leaf epicuticular waxes from
cerrado species on substrate selection by Atta sexdens rubropilosa. – Entomologia
Experimentalis et Applicata 74: 63-69.
Stachowicz, J. J. & Hay, M. E., 1996: Facultative mutualism between an herbivorous
crab and a coralline alga: advantages of noxious seaweeds. – Oecologia 105: 377-
387.
Swan, C. M. & Palmer, M. A., 2006: Composition of speciose leaf litter alters stream
detritivore growth, feeding activity and leaf breakdown. – Oecologia 147: 469-478.
Wallace, J. B. & Webster, J. R., 1996: The role of macroinvertebrates in stream
ecosystem function. – Annual Review of Entomology 41: 115-139.
Wantzen, K. M. & Wagner, R., 2006: Detritus processing by invertebrate shredders: a
neotropical-temperate comparison. – Journal of the North American Benthological
Society 25: 216-232.
Webster, J. R. & Benfield, E. F., 1986: Vascular plant breakdown in freshwater
ecosystems. – Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 567-594.
Welker, B. J., König, W., Pietsch, M. & Adams, R. P., 2007: Feeding selectivity by
mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in relation to leaf secondary
chemistry in Hymenaea courbaril. – Journal of Chemical Ecology 33: 1186-1196.
Yeates, L. V. & Barmuta, L. A., 1999: The effects of willow and eucalypt leaves on
feeding preference and growth of some Australian aquatic macroinvertebrates. –
Australian Journal of Ecology 24: 593-598.
Zar, J. H., 1999: Biostatistical Analysis. – Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
74
Conclusões
1. As larvas de Phylloicus apresentaram ampla plasticidade no comportamento
de construção de casulos e sua preferência foi determinada pela composição
química e disponibilidade das folhas.
2. As relações comprimento-biomassa descritas para esta população de
Phylloicus foram significativas e podem ser utilizadas em experimentos de
laboratório que avaliem, por exemplo, as taxas de crescimento e a produção
secundária destes fragmentadores.
3. O comportamento alimentar de Phylloicus foi mais influenciado pela
qualidade das folhas disponíveis do que sua origem (nativas/exóticas).
4. As folhas de Eucalyptus não constituíram um recurso alimentar de maior
valor nutricional para as larvas de Phylloicus do que as folhas de espécies do
Cerrado.
5. Phylloicus e Gammarus apresentaram a mesma preferência alimentar quando
expostos a detritos de baixa qualidade nutricional e o comportamento
alimentar de ambos fragmentadores foi influenciado principalmente pela
concentração de lignina dos detritos foliares.
75
ConsideraçõesFinaisePerspectivasFuturas
Os resultados aqui apresentados revelaram que o comportamento das larvas de
Phylloicus é determinado principalmente pelas características químicas, dureza e
disponibilidade dos detritos foliares. Além disso, a baixa qualidade nutricional e
palatabilidade das folhas normalmente encontradas nos córregos do Cerrado brasileiro
podem ser responsáveis pela menor abundância de organismos fragmentadores nestes
ambientes. No entanto, o comportamento alimentar exibido por Phylloicus foi
semelhante ao exibido por Gammarus, corroborando estudos anteriores e reforçando a
idéia de que os padrões observados para o comportamento alimentar de
fragmentadores de região temperada também podem ser aplicados aos equivalentes
tropicais.
Dentre as características das folhas do Cerrado, a dureza foliar tem um papel
fundamental na atividade dos fragmentadores e, conseqüentemente, nas taxas de
decomposição de detritos foliares. Os resultados obtidos mostraram que os teores de
lignina foram a principal característica que afetou as taxas de consumo exibidas pelos
fragmentadores. Desta forma, para o maior entendimento dos padrões que
determinam o processamento de detritos foliares em córregos do Cerrado brasileiro e
de outras regiões tropicais com características semelhantes, recomenda-se que os
seguintes tópicos sejam avaliados em experimentos futuros:
1. As taxas de decomposição e o comportamento alimentar de invertebrados
fragmentadores expostos a detritos foliares que apresentem um amplo
gradiente de dureza.
2. As taxas de assimilação e respiração das larvas de Phylloicus, bem como seu o
crescimento e sobrevivência durante maiores períodos de exposição.
3. As possíveis alterações no comportamento de Phylloicus na presença de outros
fragmentadores tropicais e organismos de outros grupos trópicos funcionais
como, por exemplo, predadores.
4. A dinâmica populacional e o ciclo de vida das larvas de Phylloicus.
5. A influência das assembléias de decompositores, microrganismos e
invertebrados fragmentadores, no processamento de detritos foliares em
córregos tropicais de diferentes regiões e tipos vegetacionais.
76
Por fim, as informações levantadas pelos experimentos realizados com
Phylloicus e a elevada riqueza de espécies presentes na vegetação ripária de córregos
de cabeceira tropicais sugerem que a abundância e a importância dos organismos
fragmentadores no processamento de detritos foliares nestes ambientes estão mais
relacionadas às características locais que determinam a composição de espécies
arbóreas das zonas ripárias (p.ex., altitude, tipo de vegetação e clima) do que a
padrões latitudinais generalizados, contrariando o que vem sendo sugerido nas últimas
décadas pela literatura internacional.
77
Referências
Cheshire K., Boyero B. & Pearson, R.G. (2005) Food webs in tropical Australian
streams: shredders are not scarce. Freshwater Biology, 50, 748-769.
Copasa-MG, Companhia de Saneamento de Minas Gerais. Website:
www.copasa.com.br
Dobson M., Magana A., Mathooko J.M. & Ndegwa F.K. (2002) Detritivores in
Kenyan highland streams: more evidence for the paucity of shredders in the
tropics? Freshwater Biology, 47, 909-919.
Gonçalves, J.F., Graça M.A.S. & Callisto M. (2007) Litter decomposition in a
Cerrado savannah stream is retarded by leaf toughness, low dissolved nutrients and
a low density of shredders. Freshwater Biology, 52, 1440-1451.
Irons J. G., Oswood M. W., Stout J. R. & Pringle C. M. (1994) Latitudinal patterns in
leaf litter breakdown: is temperature really important? Freshwater Biology, 32,
401-411.
Jacobsen, D., Cressa C., Mathooko J. M. & Dudgeon, D. (2008) Macroinvertebrates:
composition, life histories and production. In: Dudgeon D. (ed): Tropical stream
ecology, pp. 65-105. Academic Press, Burlington.
Kaenel B. R., Buehrer H. & Uehlinger U. (2000) Effects of aquatic plant management
on stream metabolism and oxygen balance in streams. Freshwater Biology, 45, 85-
95.
Li A. O. Y. & Dudgeon D. (2009) Shredders: species richness, abundance, and role in
litter breakdown in tropical Hong Kong streams. Journal of the North American
Benthological Society, 28, 167-180.
Mathuriau C. & Chauvet E. (2002) Breakdown of leaf litter in a neotropical stream.
Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 21, 384-396.
Moretti M.S., Gonçalves J.F., Ligeiro R. & Callisto M. (2007) Invertebrates
colonization on native tree leaves in a neotropical stream (Brazil). International
Review of Hydrobiology, 92, 199-210.
Wantzen K. M. & Wagner R. (2006) Detritus processing by invertebrate shredders: a
neotropical-temperate comparison. Journal of the North American Benthological
Society, 25, 216-232.