8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
1/61
ergonomics SAJune 2010 Vol. 22 No 1
A peer-reviewed publication of the Ergonomics Society of South Africa.
ISSN NUMBER: 10 10 2728 esa
A peer-reviewed publication of the Ergonomics Society of South Africa.
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
2/61
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of South Africa
EDITORIAL BOARD
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
CJ CHRISTIE (Rhodes University)
EDITORIAL BOARD (South African and International)
R BRIDGER (Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, U.K.) P STONE (Loughborough University of Technology)
H HENDRICK (University of Southern California) H SHAHNAVAZ (Lulea University)
PA SCOTT (Rhodes University) J WALL (University of South Alabama)
PRODUCTION COORDINATOR
J McDougall (Rhodes University)
ADVERTISING SALES
CJ Christie ([email protected] (046) 6038470)
PUBLISHING
Department of Human Kinetics and Ergonomics (for: Ergonomics Society of South
Africa)
P.O. Box 94
Rhodes University
Grahamstown
6140
(046) 6038468
REPRO AND PRINTING
Dupliprint (printed copies)
Department of Human Kinetics and Ergonomics (pdf copies)
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
3/61
AIMS AND SCOPE
ergonomics SA (esa) provides a medium for publication of material relevant to
occupational conditions and needs in Southern Africa at a time of change unparalleled
in history. To this end the journal accepts articles in the following categories: researchpapers, review articles, conceptual theories, methodological articles involving
technology for recording and/or analysing humans at work, observational reports from
the field, brief research reports/updates, and news and views.
The editors aim to ensure that professional rigour characterises all published material
while recognising that the needs of Southern Africa in this field and of Ergonomics
anywhere, are for the generation and dissemination of technical, non technical,
fundamental and applied knowledge. To this end the journal welcomes review papers
and encourages contributions to its News and Views section.
RESEARCH PAPERS: Original empirical articles of significance for the broadly
ramified field of Ergonomics are welcomed, particularly those related to the problemsassociated with Industrially Developing Countries, particularly in a Southern African
context. These may involve original theory and/or unique application.
REVIEW ARTICLES: Review articles are encouraged and those whose focus is on
application of the contained knowledge to the situation as it pertains in Southern Africa
are most sought. The requirement of readability and appropriate writing style is
particularly crucial here.
METHODOLOGICAL REPORTS: Papers devoted to the technology for recording
and/or analysing of parameters relative to humans at work, so long as these are
presented in a form intelligible to readers representing a wide variety of professional
backgrounds, are welcomed. The requirement of clarity of exposition, particularly interms of illustrations, is particularly relevant here.
CASE STUDIES/OBSERVATIONAL RECORDS: Interesting case
studies/observations from the field, especially if they suggest problems or solutions not
previously considered, will be accepted.
RESEARCH NOTES/UPDATES: Ongoing research information which may stimulate
debate or foster contacts between professionals with similar interests may be
summarised in short (one or two page) updates. These are not subjected to formal blind
review by referees, but are published at the discretion of the Chief Editors.
NEWS AND VIEWS: Submissions for this section of the journal are personal reportsor position statements and these are encouraged in the interest of fostering debate,
stimulating thought or revision and promoting exchange of ideas. Views expressed do
not necessarily carry endorsement from the editorial board but they must be expressed
in conformity with accepted norms and standards. Contributions to News and Views are
subjected to an open review process. Letters to the Editors in Chief, engendered by
contributions appearing earlier in the journal, may be published in subsequent issues
under this section.
ergonomics SA is free to members of ESSA and may be purchased by non-members on
request from the production coordinator [email protected] or on (046) 6038468.
ISSN NUMBER: 10 10 2728
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
4/61
Journal of the Ergonomics Society of South Africa.
Volume 22 (1), June 2010
CONTENTS
Editorial ............................................................................................................ 1
Ergonomic evaluation of tasks performed by female workers in the unorganized
sectors of the manual brick manufacturing units in India
S Sahu and M Sett...................................................................................................... 2
An ergonomic evaluation of workstations in small-scale cybercafes in Nigeria
S J Ojolo, S A Oke, A E Adesegha, R R Dinrifo, A Oluwo and S Orewa................... 17
Small & medium Scale Casting and Forging Industry in India: an ergonomic
Study
L P Singh, A Bhardwaj, K K Deepak and S Sahu...................................................... 36
Information for contributors................................................................................... 57
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
5/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
1
EDITORIAL______________________________________________________________________
The euphoria of the 2010 Soccer World Cup is now over and what a world cup it was.
South Africa proved the world wrong and did itself proud congratulations to theorganizing committee and all the South Africans who made our international visitors
feel so welcome. Why, you may ask, am I bringing the Soccer World Cup into an
ergonomics journal? Well firstly, because I am a proud South African and this is a
South African journal, but secondly, because many ergonomists steer clear of sports
research considering it the realm of the sports scientist. However, there are important
links between the science of sport and the science of work. The most important being
that sport for many is their work. I would like to highlight one soccer-specific example
from a recent paper in the Journal of Sports Sciences (Reilly, 2005). Very briefly,
according to this article, as soccer is a team game, a priority in preparing players for
match-play must be to harness their individual capabilities so that the group becomes an
effective competitive unit. The paper highlights many individual and team factors thatneed to be considered (Figure 1). The model suggests that coaches (managers/engineers)
need to consider interfacing the demands of the game (tasks) with the capabilities of the
players (the workers). Thus, when preparing for competition (work), technical, tactical
and physiological requirements must be integrated in a holistic manner.
Figure 1: An ergonomics model for the analyses of football (Taken from Reilly, 2005)
Just like this model, the three papers comprising the current issue of Ergonomics SA use
the same principles of interfacing the demands of the work environment with thecapabilities of the indigenous work forces in India and Nigeria. The articles all highlight
the importance of ergonomics interventions within various industries in these
developing nations and provide important directions for future research.
Thus, the basic research premise of ergonomics and sports science is the same, just the
application differs!
Candice Christie (Editor-in-Chief)
Reilly, T., 2005. An ergonomics model of the soccer training process.Journal of Sports
Sciences, 23(6), 561-572.
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
6/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
2
Ergonomic evaluation of tasks performed by female workers
in the unorganized sectors of the manual brick manufacturing
units in IndiaS Sahu M Sett
Department of Physiology
University of Kalyani
Kalyani-741235
Nadia, West Bengal,
India
Abstract
Manual brick manufacturing units in India, especially in the unorganized sectors,
employ a large number of female workers. In the present investigation, an attempt was
made to ergonomically evaluate the posture and the musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs)
of the female workers engaged in the brick manufacturing units. Two main types of task
are performed by the female workers in the brick fields in the unorganized sectors viz,
brick moulding and brick carrying. Modified Nordic Questionnaire and Body Part
Discomfort (BPD) scale was applied on these workers to identify the MSDs and thezones of discomfort in different body parts. Four different types of postural analyses
viz, OWAS, RULA, REBA and LUBA were done to find out the postural load of the
female workers at work. Statistical analyses showed that the zones of maximum
discomfort for the female moulders are the low back (9.31.45), followed by the calf
muscles (8.31.09), trunk (8.21.33), ankle (8.11.73), and wrist (8.01.71). On the
other hand, the maximum discomfort zones in the brick carriers are the head (9.21.63)
followed by the neck (8.81.21), trunk (8.41.61) and low back (8.21.59). Thus,
immediate ergonomic interventions are needed to prevent the MSDs by correcting the
harmful working postures and to reduce their work stress.
Key words: Manual brick manufacturing, Indian female workers, posture analysis,MSD.
1 IntroductionBrick manufacturing work is an age-old profession practised all over the world. In this
industry a lot of manual material handling (MMH) tasks are performed. In the
developed countries some mechanization was introduced but various studies show that
the workers working in the brick manufacturing units suffer from musculoskeletal
problems (Buckle and Stubbs, 1990; Ferreira and Tracy, 1991; Brogmus and Marko,
1991; Basra and Crawford, 1995; Cooket al., 1996; Heuer et al,. 1996; Chung and Kee,
2000; Trevelyan and Haslani, 2001).
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
7/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
3
Notwithstanding the technological advances, a large number of workers perform heavy
MMH jobs in developing countries, especially in the unorganized sectors. Studies from
developing countries like India show that these workers suffer from assorted health
problems due to awkward postures and carrying heavy loads (Mukhopadhyay, 2008;
Sett and Sahu, 2008). All these authors concluded that musculoskeletal disorders(MSDs) resulted from frequent trunk bending, twisting and repetitive handling of
several bricks at a time. Moreover, some studies report that women have a higher
prevalence rate of work-related MSDs than that of men (Treaster and Burr, 2004; Basu
et al., 2008b).
The postures adopted by the workers in their working place depends upon the type of
work, the design of the work place, personal characteristics, the tools required to
perform the particular work and also the duration and frequency of the work cycle
(Bridger, 1995; Putz-Anderson, 1988). So, various techniques have been reported for
postural analyses to identify the stress during different phases of work (Colombini et al.,
1985).
One of the earliest methods of work posture assessment was Ovako Working postures
Assessment System (OWAS) (Karhu et al., 1977). Other authors used this method for
posture analysis (Kant et al., 1990; Kivi and Mattila, 1991; Engels et al., 1994). The
other method for postural analysis is the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) (Mc
Atamney and Corlett, 1993). RULA has been extensively used in various studies
(Leuder, 1996; Axelsson, 1997; Gutierrez, 1998). The other two recent techniques of
work posture analysis are the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) (Hignett and
McAtamney, 2000) and Loading on the Upper Body Assessment (LUBA) (Kee and
Karwowski, 2001).
Therefore, an ergonomic study was conducted on these female workers by continuous
observation method to identify and quantify the postural stress. Moreover, the suitability
of these postural analysis methods in evaluating the working postures adopted by the
Indian female workers during different MMH tasks was under investigation. This study
also sought the prevalence of MSDs among the female brick moulders and carriers.
1.1 The brick manufacturing scenario in IndiaThe manual brick manufacturing process in India has been going on for centuries, and
millions of people are employed. A large number of female workers are engaged in this
field. In unorganized sectors, these workers are recruited temporarily on a seasonal basis
and thus are neither trained nor sufficiently experienced. Therefore, they do not haveany previous knowledge about unsafe acts and hazards related to this work, or they
simply ignore the safe working process, as also seen among the female construction
labourers of India (Basu et al., 2005; Basu et al., 2008a). MMH is the cheapest solution
in developing countries (Maiti, 2008), so most of the brick manufacturing units in India
perform the task of MMH.
The workers are recruited by employers on a seasonal basis, mainly from November to
April. These female workers come from different villages from the same or different
states of India. No work occurs during Indias monsoon season (June to August). They
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
8/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
4
then go back to their villages and engage themselves in some other work, like
agriculture, basket making, etc. or remain unemployed.
There are two groups of female workers in brick manufacturing units, whose main tasks
are brick making and carrying bricks respectively. The group of female workers thatcarry raw bricks from the stacks in the field to the brick kiln and baked bricks back from
the kiln, to stack in some other places in the field are grouped as the Brick Carriers.
They work from 6:00 am to 10:30 am, take a break and again work from 2:00 pm to
6:00 pm. The other group of female workers that mix mud, carry the mud in a wooden
cart to the field, dump it and then use the mud for moulding bricks in the field are
grouped as the Brick Moulders. These female brick moulders work continuously from
6:00 am till sunset, taking intervals only while having their breakfast or lunch. Both
groups of workers work six days a week. The jobs of the two groups are not
interchangeable and they can only perform the task that is allotted to them. The workers
are paid on a contractual basis i.e. at the rate of every thousand bricks moulded or
carried.
2 Methods2.1 SubjectsThe study was conducted on 144 female workers (60 brick moulders and 84 brick
carriers) engaged in four different brick fields of West Bengal, India. Adult female
workers with at least one year of work experience were randomly chosen from different
manual brick manufacturing units in India. According to the nature of their work, they
were divided into the two groups.
2.2 Physical parametersPhysical parameters such as stature and body weight were measured with an
anthropometric rod and a weighing machine respectively. Body Mass Index (BMI) was
calculated from the anthropometric data (Poskitt, 2000).
2.3 Activity analysisWork study during actual work in the field was performed according to ILO, 1984.
Methodical studyby drawing multiple activity charts was done by Activity Sampling
method. Time studywas also done with the help of a properly calibrated stop watch.
Time taken for a particular job in each cycle and thus in each hour was observed and
noted.
2.4 Postural analysisWorking postures were evaluated directly by visual observation as well as indirectly by
a camera, and then analyzed by the following methods:
2.4.1 OWAS method(Karhu et al., 1977):Four levels of risk were identified as a function of a number of postural factors such as
the back, upper limb, lower limb postures and the degree of strength required. The four
levels of risk were then related in assessing the remedial actions: no action necessary,
action in the near future, action to be taken soon and action to be taken immediately.
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
9/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
5
2.4.2 RULA method(McAtamney and Corlett, 1993):This was developed to assess the workers work-related upper limb disorders. For this
assessment, the postures were at first randomly selected from the freeze photographs, to
be scored as per the scoring sheet. Then the scores were put through tables that were
converted to a grand score of 1 to 7, after which they were clustered into four actionlevels.
2.4.3 REBA method(Hignett and McAtamney, 2000):The postures to be assessed were first scored and transformed into Score A and Score B
from the given table. The two scores were then entered into another table to produce the
final Score C. This result was interpreted into a table containing five action levels,
giving the risk of the assessed posture.
2.4.4 LUBA method(Kee and Karwowski, 2001):Each
joint motion class of the posture to be assessed was assigned a numerical relative
discomfort score on the basis of discomfort value, which was then categorized into four
action levels.
2.5 Nordic Questionnaire studyNordic Questionnaire (Kuorinka et al., 1987) was modified according to the situation
and was used to interview to workers in their local dialect (Bengali and Hindi). The
questionnaire emphasized their individual details, type of work and the occurrence or
frequency of pain felt in different parts of their body.
2.6 Subjective methods of discomfortThe intensity of pain or different types of discomfort was measured by utilizing theBody Part Discomfort (BPD) scale (Jacquelin et al., 1994). The scale consists of marks
from 1 to 10 and ranges from just noticeable discomfort to intolerable discomfort. A 0
in the scale means no discomfort at all.
2.7 Statistical analysisThe data were expressed as mean standard error of mean. Comparison of the means of
the Body Part Discomfort zones of different body parts in the female brick moulders
with respect to that of the female brick carriers were made by students t-test and
P
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
10/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
6
Table 1. The physical characteristics and experience of the female workers
Height (cm) Weight (Kg) Body Mass
Index (BMI)
(Kg/m2)
Age (years) Experience
(Years)
144.15 5.67
(138-152)
40.83 4.9
(35-50)
18.43 1.33
(16.44-21.4)
22.3 3.13
(18-27)
3.2 6.25 (1-8)
(Values: Mean SEM, Figures in parentheses indicate the range)
Nutritional status of the subjects was assessed from their BMI and the mean value
showed that the subjects suffered from Chronic Energy Deficiency (CED) (Weisell,
2002). Pal et al., (2008) showed that 30% of the young tribal women engaged in brick
fields were affected by CED. The female workers working in different manual brick
manufacturing units were quite young (22.3 3.13 years)and so they had less working
experience.
3.2 Activity analysisEach activity of the workers was analysed and is represented in Table 2.
Table 2. The work and time study of the two groups of female workers
Groups Activities Load handled
(kg)
Time taken (sec)/
Cycle
No. of cycles/
Hour
Brick moulding
(6.9 .45 mins/
Cycle)
Mixing mud once
with hand
Carrying mud by
pushing a woodencart
Cutting mud for 1
brick
Squat and mould
1 brick
Take out 1 brick
from mould
23.26 2.01
37.76 2.95
5.85 .25
6.07 .31
5.37 .39
14.55 3.67
34.65 1.31
3.46 .55
9.50 1.33
3.95 .67
11.41 .67
9.57 .45
76.28 .9
68.33 .37
80.12 .33
Brick carrying
(9.37 1.13
mins/trip)
Stack 1 brick onhead
Stand with 12
bricks on head
Walk with bricks
on head
Unload 1 brick
and place on the
kiln top
49.61 .55
50.05 .69
50.31 1.01
30.25 4.14
10.62 2.25
5.29 3.19
66.23 3.67
11.07 1.33
23.67 .17
45.03 .79
7.45 .28
25.13 .55
(Values: Mean SEM)
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
11/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
7
The tasks of the brick moulders are completed within a cycle time of 6.9 .45 mins.
Thus they complete about eight such cycles in one hour. The time taken (sec) to mould
one brick has been depicted in the table. Altogether they mould 8-10 bricks in 3.88 .7
min with the mud that they carry at one time, in the wooden cart. On the other hand, the
brick carriers complete one whole cycle in 9.37 1.13 min and the female workerscarry 10 to 12 bricks at a time.
From Table 2 it can be concluded that for cutting mud and moulding, the cycle time is
much less. These tasks are described as repetitive as they perform more cycles per hour,
so the brick moulders are put under stress. On the other hand, maximum time is spent by
the brick carriers walking a distance (.6 .13 Km) to and from the field and brick kiln,
with load (50.31 1.01 kg) or without load respectively. Each unbaked brick weighs
about 4.5-5.0 kg and each baked brick weighs about 3.5-4.0 kg. They carry 10-12 bricks
at a time. They are paid per thousand bricks carried, so even if they get exhausted, they
carry on with their task, which further puts the brick carriers under stress.
3.3 Postural analysis
A. B.
C. D.
Figure 1. Photographs of the female workers engaged in different activities in the
brick field: - (A) Carrying mud in a wooden cart, (B) Moulding mud, (C)
Stacking bricks on head, (D) Walking with bricks on head to the brick
kiln
In Table 3, the postural analysis of the different steps in brick moulding performed by
the female workers is represented in detail, along with the maximum discomfort zone
and rating. The different tasks done by the female workers while moulding bricks are:
mixing mud by hand, carrying mud by pushing a small wooden cart, cutting mud,
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
12/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
8
squatting to mould, and finally taking out a brick from the mould. These tasks have
been designated as a, b, c, d and e respectivelyfor convenience in discussion.
According to the known four types of postural assessment, the risk level of postures a, c
and d have been categorized from High to Very high and these postures needimmediate corrective measures in the near future. But there are some disparities among
the results obtained from the four methods of postural analysis in postures b and e.
According to OWAS and LUBA methods, posture b is not harmful, unlike the results
obtained from REBA and RULA methods. Again, OWAS analysis of posture e is
categorized as having some risk but the others define it to be very risky. As per the
maximum discomfort rating, the posture adopted in e is marked as intolerably strenuous
(9.1 .33) by the female moulders.
Hignett and McAtamney (2006) stated that RULA is generally used if the person is
sitting, standing still or in an otherwise sedentary position, and mainly using the upper
body and arms to work. For all other tasks REBA should be used. On the other hand,Kee and Karwowski (2006) indicated that the LUBA technique is applied to the seated
or standing postures, with the lower limb well supported in an evenly balanced posture.
OWAS postural analyses have been worked out on a wide range of postures, from
bricklaying (Kivi and Mattila, 1991) to nurses (Engels et al., 1994) to the workers in
garages (Kant et al., 1990) but the results can be low in detail (Hignett and McAtamney,
2000). So, a suitable method is required for evaluating the postures adopted by workers
squatted on the ground (Fig 1. B), in the Indian context.
In Table 4 the total postural analysis of the sequential steps in brick carrying is
represented in detail, along with the maximum discomfort zone and rating. The different
tasks done by the female workers while carrying bricks are: stacking bricks on head,standing with bricks on head, walking with bricks on head, and finally unloading bricks
on the kiln top. They have been designated as f, g, h and i for convenience in
discussion.
Postures fand h are categorized as having medium to high risk level as per all the
types of postural assessment. The results obtained from LUBA and RULA methods are
same for posture g and this is the correct method for assessing such postures. These
methods are used in postures when an individual is sitting or standing still with lower
limbs well supported and the upper body is at work. Moreover, the maximum
discomfort rating is in the head (8.9 .67) because the carriers carry heavy loads. There
are differences in these results from that of the OWAS method, which marks posture i tobe harmful. So, OWAS, REBA, RULA and LUBA methods do not evaluate the half
squat posture adopted by the workers during this task.
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
13/61
9
Table 3. Different methods of postural analysis of the female brick moulder
Posture Activities OWAS
code
Risk
(OWAS)
RULA
score
Action
level
(RULA)
REBA
score
Risk
level
(REBA)
LUBA
postural
load
Actio
categ
(LUB
a
Mixing
mud by
hand
2, 1, 3, 3 Major
strain
7 4 10 High 15 IV
b
Carrying
mud bypushing a
wooden
cart
2, 1, 6, 3 Not
harmful
7 4 9 High 8 II
c
Cutting
mud
2, 1, 3, 2 Major
strain
7 4 11,12 Very
High,
12 III
d
Squat and
mould
2, 1, 3, 1 Some
strain
7 4 10 High 13 III
e
Take outbrick from
mould
4, 1, 3, 1 Some
strain
7 4 13 Very
High
16 IV
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
14/61
Table 4. Different methods of postural analysis of the female brick carrier
Posture Activities OWAS
code
Risk
(OWAS)
RULA
score
Action
level
(RULA)
REBA
score
Risk
level
(REBA)
LUBA
postural
load
Action
category
(LUBA)
f
Stack
bricks on
head
1, 3, 3,
3
Some
strain
4,6 2,3 6,9 Medium,
High
10 III
g
Stand
with
bricks on
head
1, 3, 1,
3
Some
strain
7 4 9 High 15 IV
h
Walkwith
bricks on
head
1, 3, 6,3
Somestrain
5 3 9 High 10 III
i
Unload
bricks on
the kiln
top
2, 2, 3,
3
Harmful 6,7 3,4 7,9 Medium,
High
7,13 II,III
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
15/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
11
3.4 Discomfort and pain in different body partsFigure 2 shows the graphical representation of pain in different parts of the body of two
groups of the female workers, according to the modified Nordic Questionnaire.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Head
Neck
Shoulde
rElbo
w
Uppera
rm
Lowe
rarm
Wrist
Hand
Trun
k
Lowba
ckTh
igh Knee Fe
etAn
kle Calf
Leg
Different body parts
Complaints(%
)
Brick moulders
(N=60)
Brick carriers
(N=84)
Figure 2. Complaints about pain (in percentage) in different parts of the body of
two groups of female workers
From the graph it is clear that the brick moulders have more pain in the low back andpart of the legs because most of the time they sit continuously in the same awkward
posture to mould the bricks. On the other hand, since the female brick carriers carry a
heavy load to and from the field and the brick kiln, they suffer more discomfort and
pain in the head, neck, shoulder and also their trunk. Musculoskeletal pain is not felt by
the workers before work or at work. 38.89 % of the female workers feel severe pain just
after their whole days work, i.e. in the evening. Others feel pain in their different body
parts when they go to sleep at night and take rest.
The intensity of pain or discomfort was measured by utilizing the Body Part Discomfort
(BPD) scale, which is depicted by graphical presentation in Figure 3.
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
16/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Head NeckSh
oulderEl
bow
Upperarm
Lowe
rarmWrist HandTrunk
LowbackTh
igh Knee Feet Ankle Calf
Different body parts
BodyPartDiscomfortSc
ale
Brick moulders (N=60)
Brick carriers (N=84)
Figure 3. Graphical presentation of the different discomfort zones of the body, as
per the Body Part Discomfort (BPD) scale of the two groups of female
workers
From the above graphical representation it is clear that more discomfort zones are
concentrated in the upper part of the body of the female brick carriers, such as the head,
neck, shoulders, arms etc. than that of the lower body parts, as seen in the case of
female brick moulders (P
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
17/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
13
Among the types of discomfort, it was noticed that the female workers of both groups
felt pain in different body parts. The percentage of pain is higher (90.48%) in the case of
the female brick carriers. However, as the socio-economic conditions of the workers are
very poor, so to earn more they carry more bricks even if they get exhausted. The
percentage of swelling and stiffness is lower but cannot remain unnoticed.
From the study, it is recommended that redesigning the workplace and rescheduling the
work-rest cycles of these female workers, along with proper counselling of food habits
and maintaining hygienic conditions, is necessary to upgrade their quality of life. An
ergonomically designed sitting stool is suggested for the brick moulders and assistive
load carrying or carrying bricks loaded on a cart would reduce the workers work load
in the work place.
4 ConclusionAccording to the OWAS and REBA methods, the postures adopted by the brickmoulders have been categorized as having High to Very high risk levels and that of
the postures adopted by the brick carriers have Medium to High risk levels, even
though complaints about the different discomfort feelings are more prevalent among the
carriers. The results are supported by the subjective assessment of discomfort. The
female workers rise before dawn to finish off their household chores and cooking before
they move off to the brick fields, which altogether puts them under stress. Thus OWAS
and REBA methods of postural analysis closely correlate with the awkward postures
adopted by the female workers. Though REBA method is used for sitting postures, a
new method of postural analysis needs to be developed in the future for assessing the
postures of being seated on the ground, as in the Indian context.
Moreover, ergonomic interventions such as redesigning the workplace and the work-rest
schedule would improve the conditions of the female workers and reduce their work
stress.
Acknowledgement
The authors express their sincere gratitude to all those female workers and the
employers from the different brick manufacturing units, who rendered immense co-
operation for the completion of this study.
References
Axelsson, J. R. C., 1997, RULA in action: enhancing participation and continuous
improvements. In Seppala, P., Luopajarvi, T., Nygard, C. H. and Mattila, M. (Eds):
From experience to innovation-IEA97. Proceedings of the 13th
Triennial Congress of
the International Ergonomics Association, Tampere, Finland, June 29-July 4, Helsinki,
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 4, pp. 251-253.
Basra, G. and Crawford, J. O., 1995. Contemporary Ergonomics, (Taylor and Francis,
London), Robertson, S. A. (Ed), Assessing work-related upper limb disorders in a brick
making factory, pp. 480-485.
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
18/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
14
Basu, K., Sahu, S. and Paul, G., 2005. Study on construction labourers working in
unorganized sectors,Journal of science, 1, 53-60.
Basu, K., Sahu, S. and Paul, G., 2008a. An ergonomic study of work injuries in
construction work in unorganized sector, Journal of Environmental Physiology, 1(1),55-62.
Basu, K., Sahu, S. and Paul, G., 2008b. Ergonomic evaluation of work stress among
female labourers of unorganized sectors of the construction industry in India, Asian-
Pacific Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety, 15(3), 57-58.
Bridger, R.S., 1995. Introduction to Ergonomics, (Mc Graw-Hill Book Co.), Singapore.
Brogmus, G. E. and Marko, R., 1991. Advances in industrial Ergonomics and Safety III
(Taylor and Francis, London), Karwowski, W. and Yates, J. W. (Eds), Cumulative
trauma disorders of the upper extremities: the magnitude of the problem in USindustry, pp. 95-102.
Buckle, P. W. and Stubbs, D. A., 1990. Contemporary ergonomics, (Taylor and Francis,
London), Lovesy, E. J. (Ed), Epidemiological aspects of musculoskeletal disorders of
the shoulder and upper limbs, pp. 75-78.
Chung, M. K. and Kee, D., 2000. Evaluation of lifting tasks frequently performed
during brick manufacturing processes using NIOH lifting equations, International
Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25(2), 423-433.
Colombini, D., Occhipinti, E., Molteni, G., Grieco, A., Pedotti, A., Boccardi, S., Frigo,
S. and Menoni, O., 1985. Posture analyses,Ergonomics, 28(1), 275-284.
Cook, T. M., Rosecrance, J. C. and Zimmermann, C. L., 1996. Work-related
musculoskeletal disorders in brick laying: a symptom and job factors survey and
guidelines for improvements, Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene,
11(6), 1335-1339.
Das, D. and Das, A., 2004. Statistics in Biology and Psychology, 4th
edn, (Academic
publishers), Calcutta, pp. 32-122.
Engels, J. A., Landeweered, J. A. and Kant, Y., 1994. An OWAS-based analysis of
nurses working postures,Ergonomics, 37(5), 900-919.
Ferreira, D. P. and Tracy, M. F., 1991. Contemporary Ergonomics, (Taylor and Francis,
London), Dovekey F. J. (Ed), Musculoskeletal disorders in a brick company, pp. 475-
480.
Gutierrez, A. M. J. A., 1998. A workstation design for a Philippine semiconductor, In
Bishu, R., Karwowski, W. and Goonetilleke, R. S. (Eds), ERGON-AXIA98.
Proceedings of the first World Congress on Ergonomics for Global Quality and
Productivity, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, July 8-11, HK University of Science and
Technology, pp. 133-136.
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
19/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
15
Heuer, H., Klimmer, F., Kylian, H., Seeber, A., Schmidt, K. H., Hoffmann, G. and
Luttke-Nymphius, M., 1996. Musculoskeletal problems in brick layers as a function of
length of employment: the role of secondary selection by low-back pain, Work and
Stress, 10, 322-335.
Hignett, S. and McAtamney, L., 2000. Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA),
Applied Ergonomics, 31, 201-205.
Hignett, S. and McAtamney, L., 2006. Fundamentals and assessment tools for
occupational ergonomics, 2nd
edn. (Taylor and Francis), Marras, W. S. and Karwowski,
W. (Eds), REBA and RULA: Whole body and Upper Limb Rapid Assessment Tools.
International Labour Organization, 1984.Introduction to work study, 4th
edn, (Universal
Publishing Corporation), Bombay, p. 402.
Jacquelin, L. R., Drury, G. and Richard, L. B., 1994. A field methodology for thecontrol of musculoskeletal injuries,Applied Ergonomics, 25, 3-16.
Kant, I., Notermans, J. H. V. and Borm, P. J. A., 1990. Observations of working
postures in garages using Ovako Working Postures Analysis System (OWAS) and
consequent workload reduction recommendations,Ergonomics,33(2), 209-220.
Karhu, O., Kansi, P. and Kuornika, I., 1977. Correcting working postures in industry: a
practical method for analyses,Applied Ergonomics, 8(4), 199-201.
Kee, D. and Karwowski, W., 2001. LUBA - An assessment technique for postural
loading on the upper body based on joint motion discomfort and maximum holding
time,Journal of Applied Ergonomics, 32, 357-366.
Kee, D. and Karwowski, W., 2006. Fundamentals and assessment tools for
occupational ergonomics, 2nd
edn. (Taylor and Francis), Marras, W. S. and Karwowski,
W. (Eds), An Assessment Technique for Postural Loading on the Upper Body
(LUBA).
Kivi, P. and Mattila, M., 1991. Analysis and improvement of work postures in the
building industry: application of the computerized OWAS method, Applied
Ergonomics, 22(1), 43-48.
Kuorinka, I., Johnson Kilbom, B., Vinterberg, A., Biering, M., Sorenson, F., Anderson,G. and Jorgenson, K., 1987. Standardized Nordic questionnaire for the analysis of
musculoskeletal symptoms,Applied Ergonomics, 18, 233-237.
Leuder, R., 1996. A proposed RULA for computer users, Proceedings of the
Ergonomics Summer Workshop, UC, Berkeley, August 8th
-9th
.
Maiti, R., 2008. Work load assessment in building construction related activities in
India,Applied Ergonomics, 39, 754-765.
McAtamney, L. and Corlett, E. N., 1993. RULA: a survey method for the investigation
of work related upper limb disorders,Applied Ergonomics, 24(2), 91-99.
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
20/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
16
Mukhopadhyay, P., 2008. Risk factors in manual brick manufacturing in India,
HFESA Journal, Ergonomics Australia, 22(1), 16-25.
Pal, N., Paul, G. and Roy, K., 2008. A study on nutritional status of tribal women in
brick fields of Birbhum district of West Bengal,Journal of Environmental Physiology,1(1), 49-54.
Poskitt, E.M., 2000. Body Mass Index and child obesity: Are we nearing a definition?
Acta Paediatrics, 89,507-509.
Putz-Anderson, V., 1988. Cumulative Trauma Disorders: a manual for musculoskeletal
diseases of the upper limbs, (Taylor and Francis), London.
Sett, M. and Sahu, S., 2008. Ergonomic study on female workers in manual brick
manufacturing units in West Bengal, India, Asian-Pacific Newsletter on Occupational
Health and Safety, 15(3), 59-60.
Treaster, D. E. and Burr, D., 2004. Gender differences in prevalence of upper extremity
musculoskeletal disorder,Ergonomics, 47(5), 495-526.
Trevelyan, F. C. and Haslani, R. A., 2001. Musculoskeletal disorders in a handmade
brick manufacturing plant, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27(3), 43-
55.
Weisell, R. C., 2002. Body mass index as an indicator of obesity,Asia Pacific Journal
of Clinical Nutrition, 11 (Suppl.), S681-S684.
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
21/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
17
An ergonomic evaluation of workstations in small-scale
cybercafes in Nigeria
S J Ojolo, S A Oke,
A E Adesegha
Department of Mechanical
Engineering
University of Lagos,
Lagos, Nigeria
R R Dinrifo
School of Engineering
Lagos State Polytechnic
Ikorodu, Lagos, Nigeria
A Oluwo, S Orewa
Department of Mechanical
Engineering
University of Lagos,
Lagos, Nigeria
Abstract
This paper presents a survey of cybercafes in a developing country to reveal their
design pitfalls and propose appropriate solutions to the observed problems based on
ergonomic principles. These cybercafes provide Internet services to communities but
the concern is to make the work convenient at the computer workplace and comfortable
at work thus reducing the risk of musculoskeletal injury and minimising energy
expended at work. A survey was conducted in fourteen cybercafes using questionnaires,
personal interviews and actual field measurements. Ergonomic analysis revealed that
cybercafe chairs are the major pitfalls of the caf design: they are often too short with
no arm rests and with insufficient backrests. Chairs are also stationary as opposed to
being mobile with rollers. Customers leg positioning under the table is restricted and
the workspace is too small. Also, the top of computer monitors often is above eye level
for an average height customer. Since very little documentation exists on the subject in
developing countries, the work opens a gate of opportunities for those in the cybercaf
business with financial constraints to implement standard designs. The work also
complements the dearth of expertise in the area since many towns in Nigeria do not
have the required expertise for cybercaf design and construction.
Keywords: Cybercafe, ergonomics, survey, developing country, Nigeria, ergonomic
evaluation, ergonomic design
1
IntroductionThe Internet has influenced the world today by providing adequate, up-to-date
information useful for research and decision making (Ahiabenu, 2002). Since only a
small fraction of Internet users in Nigeria could afford personal Internet connectivity in
their homes and offices, others utilise commercial service outlets referred to as
cybercafs. A cybercaf is a room, an office, or a social accommodation with computer
terminals connected to a server and established for profit making by selling user time.
Apart from Internet browsing and multimedia services provided by cybercafs, Internet
calls, printing, scanning, fax, online chatting, communicating with each other by
transferring computer files, searching databases, exchanging electronic mails,
conferencing, downloading and CD-ROM burning are other services also provided. On
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
22/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
18
university campuses in Nigeria, numerous students also patronize cybercafs to obtain
information on personal updates on global issues, articles, social and academic events,
data, news, projects, political issues, international contacts, commercial information and
online-transactions, travel, entertainment, and information on software and hardware.
The computer operator/user at a cybercaf undergoes a variety of muscular stresses
while working for long durations which degrades the quality of work. This situation is
similar to the case described by Parmod et al., (2006) and is well supported by Helander
(2003). Thus, the proper design of cybercaf workstations will ensure ease of
functioning for the operator/user without experiencing stress on vital body parts. In this
paper, it is emphasized that there is lack of documentation in the Nigerian environment,
which means a lack of research on cybercafs and a lack of anthropometric data. It is
observed that many new cybercafs are designed based on the intuitive knowledge of
the project team leader. However, once a particular pattern of design has been adopted
and money is spent on the project, it becomes wasteful to redesign the cybercaf when
such waste could have been avoided at the design stage. Take for instance, a design witha chair too low in height (see Finlay et al., 1983; Cram and Vinitzky, 1995). A user who
sits on this inconvenient chair for two hours or more would prefer to terminate the work
at that point due to reactions on his or her buttocks. Also, too high tables would not
permit easy browsing and writing out of information on the table. However, if standard
guides are available for cybercafs, the project team leader would benefit from the
research to design an ergonomic cybercaf. The sparse and unavailability of
anthropometric data on cybercafs for the West African population has therefore wasted
resource utilization in this sector of the economy.
The design of basic computer workstations might be different to that of a cybercaf in
many respects. For instance, two different design types are common in the Nigerianenvironment. A group of cybercaf workstations considers standardised chairs thatprovide standardised height, pan-width, backrest-width and backrest-height. The other
group utilizes highly adjustable chairs for allowing many different people to use the
same equipment. However, adjustable chairs are very expensive and wear out too often
making it only affordable to a selected few cybercafs. These sitting characteristics are
essential to maintain adequate eye level, buttock comfort, and to minimise pains due to
backrest discomfort. However, for other workplaces such as the telephone operators
workstation, supermarket counter, and receptionist in an office environment, such
highly detailed standardised specifications are also required and have been extensively
documented (Carter and Banister, 1994; Liao and Drury, 2000) However, such studies
do not provide the full details to understand the case of cybercafes. The standardised
chairs required for cybercafes are supposed to take care of the nature and period of
transactions of customers. Also, cybercafs customers spend a short to medium term
period and would need seat designs that may permit only minimum back muscle fatigue
(see also Goldstein, 1978; Lane and Stewart, 1980; Mehta and Tewari, 2000; Mehta et
al., 2008). If customers are uncomfortable with their seating posture and position, they
would just leave and take their custom elsewhere.
The Nigerian situation is unique in the sense that the culture is different from that of
other developed nations. Nigerians embrace the culture of togetherness and working in a
group even with students in tertiary institutions. Take for instance in a cybercafe,
although only one user at a time (say one hour computer time) is sold to an
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
23/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
19
undergraduate, several people may utilize this computer time at achieving a common
goal at the same time. Therefore, if the student gets the required information from the
internet despite his poor knowledge of computer and internet usage, it may be
convenient for him to go with a crowd to the cybercafe. This case is common because of
the low level of computer education of most cybercafe users. Therefore, a crowd mayeventually use the space created for a single user. This is possibly a unique situation in
an industrially developing country (Nigeria) and the associated problems call for an
investigation on the design of cybercafes in this country.
As discussed later in this article, although it is agreed that some information relating to
important aspects of computer workstation design and anthropometric measurements
may be available in the literature, they provide very little guidance for research and
decision making for developing countries, especially within the Nigerian context.
Unfortunately, anthropometric data are not available for the Nigerian population. For
example, cybercafs in a developing world context (Nigeria) might be different to more
industrialized countries when considering a number of things, which include pooraccess to Internet in homes. Human traffic in cybercafs in Nigeria is very high such
that the cybercafs owners make the most economic use of space. The luxury of space
allowance between the sitting positions of customers in cybercafs in Nigeria may not
be affordable while this could be permitted in industrialized countries with fewer people
utilizing cybercafs. In addition, the strict business laws restraining cybercaf operators
from inadequate design are not enforced in Nigeria. The uniqueness of the situation of
an industrially developing country (Nigeria) and the associated problems gives
justification for building up a new set of computer workstation design data.
2 Literature reviewThe literature reviewed here scrutinizes previous work relating to workstation design
how this could benefit the cybercaf workstation design. A series of papers have
reported on wrist postures and problems in keyboard typing (Chen et al., 1994; Hedge
and Powers, 1995; Hedge and Shew, 1996; Bash and Rempel, 1997). Some other papers
have reported on video display terminals (Hunting, 1991; Grandjean, 1993). Helander
(2003) surveyed indicators of ergonomics quality by using parameters that relate to
aesthetics and comfort and long-term ergonomics factors that depend on feedback from
ligaments, joints and the spine (see also Paul and Menon, 1994; Parsons, 1991; Radwin,
1994; Snook, 1993). Several other ergonomics considerations have been made that
could improve the quality of service in cybercafs (Hedge, 1994; Human and Rempel,
1995). The ideas for workstations developed by Shikdar and Al-Hadhrami (2007) could
be applied to cybercafes. The workstations special features include a motorized table
for upward, downward and angular movements, an ergonomic chair with an adjustable
seat pan, arm support and back support. Cost consideration and affordability are also
important considerations arising from the presentations of Mandal (1995) and Oborne
(1995). The workstation could be used as a sit, stand or sit-stand workstation. From
experience and knowledge of field visits, it seems that many parts of the cybercaf
workstations could be improved with knowledge of the literature. Thus, efforts at
improving the following would significantly improve performance at cybercaf
workstations: (1) seat/chair design (Hatta et al., 2007), (2) table/desk design, (3) indoor
air quality, and illumination levels, (4) noise levels, and more.
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
24/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
20
2.1 Seat designThe design of seats (including chairs) has been a major concern of a growing number of
investigators, who aim at providing a comfortable position for the operator in order to
guarantee optimum work performance and avoid accidents in work involving mobility.
Goonetilleke and Feizhou (2001) argued that anthropometry alone is not sufficient for
the design of seats. They argued that the differing sensitivity in the buttock and thigh
areas is an indication that chairs should be designed and selected depending on the
population under consideration. Their paper developed a methodology to evaluate the
useful seat depth for a target population. This information may be usefully adapted for
cybercafe workstation design, particularly for the various cybercafe chair designs shown
in Figures 1 to 4. Vos et al. (2006) investigated postural and chair design impacts upon
seat pan interface pressure in order to identify whether differences in posture or chair
design result in greater pressure differences. The trunk-thigh angle may, in a practical
sense, be greater than 900
since the trunk, thigh and the back have to be positioned in a
relaxed position, which is aided by an angle greater than 900. Also, the use of an armrestsignificantly reduces energy losses since the user could comfortably relax their hand on
the armrest instead of leaving it in a swinging position that consumes energy
unnecessarily. Nag et al. (2008) analyzed the human-seat interfaces to determine the
differential distribution of the body weight on the components of the seat. The study
stated that the horizontal as well as a 5 forward slope of the seat is the preferred choice,
since the load distributed at the seat was highest at the backward sloping seat for all
conditions of the supported and unsupported back. The study also reaffirms that the
backrest and armrest have a conjoint influence in reducing the load distributed at the
seat, which in turn might help in mitigating stress on the spinal and other paraspinal
structures.
2.2 Workplace layout and Visual Display UnitsWorkplace layout, which deals with how equipment and furniture are positioned to fit
the individual operator to allow good and flexible work postures, has been extensively
applied to different work settings (ISO, 1999; Toomingas and Gavhed, 2008).
Toomingas and Gavhed (2008) studied the workstation layout at call centres in Sweden
and concluded that the quality of furniture was generally good and fulfilled the demands
of the law, directives and standards. This study is not much applicable to the current
investigation in view of the different settings that the studies focus on: one focuses on
the call centre while the current study directs attention to cybercafs. These are different
services, different work posture requirements and different commitment requirementsfrom operators in terms of customer satisfaction and well-being. Thus, previous
literature is lacking in sufficient details to assist in carrying out the current study.
Lindegard et al. (2005) published data sets on workplace layout by expert ergonomists
and concluded that ratings of comfort and perceived exertion could be used as cost-
efficient and user-friendly methods for practitioners to identify high exposure to poor
workplace layout. However, Hutchinson (2008) criticized the conclusion and stated that
users and experts ratings were very largely independent of each other.
Several studies have established a relationship between musculoskeletal disorders and
the use of video display units (VDU) (e.g. Nevala-Puranen et al., 2003; Carter and
Banister, 1994; Faucett and Rempel, 1994). However, very sparse information concerns
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
25/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
21
its relationship with table dimensions, particularly for less developed societies. A
prominent result reported by Nevala-Puranen et al. (2003) showed that repeated neck,
shoulder and arm symptoms can be more efficiently reduced among newspaper
employees if ergonomic measures are combined with changes in work techniques than
if the redesign measures focuses only on the work environment. Additional studies onVDU include (i) interventions for reducing complaints on VDU while working
(Pillastrini et al., 2007); and (ii) incidence of neck pain among office employees
working with video display units (Korhomen et al., 2003) which reported that annual
incidence of neck pain was 34.4% and that the poor physical work environment and
poor placement of the keyboard increased the risk of neck pain in office employees.
From the above review, unfortunately, the ergonomics design of cybercafs particularly
in a developing country context is completely omitted. Thus, there is currently a great
need for an article presenting a viewpoint of the application of ergonomics to the design
of chairs and workstation facilities in cybercafes particularly in developing countries.
This will ensure that the customer works comfortably and utilizes the computer facilitiesoptimally with minimum loss of energy and full interest at work. In particular, the
objectives of this paper are to present a survey of cybercafes in Nigeria to reveal design
pitfalls and propose solutions based on ergonomic principles. The challenge is to
capture the various ergonomic features of cybercafe design in a quantitative way, as far
as reasonably possible, and display the distilled results.
3 Methodology3.1 SampleThe participants in this study were mainly university students, some secondary school
students and a large number of young post-secondary school graduates which are in the
working class group whose activities are almost daily on the utilization of computers for
browsing at the cybercafes. These cybercafes are concentrated around the two university
campuses University of Ibadan and University of Lagos where data were collected.
This study was carried out on the few operators that render services to customers daily,
particularly those who volunteered to provide useful data for this study. The study took
the anthropometric data of 100 respondents which include 55 males and 45 females.
Please note that information concerning 5 other respondents could not be obtained due
to the non cooperation of the respondents. Although no biographical information such
as ethnic background was documented, experience revealed that the majority of the
respondents belonged to the Yoruba and Igbo ethnic groups while the Hausa ethnicgroup members covered by the study were insignificant. Additional information on the
demographic characteristics of the people interviewed would have been useful but could
not be collected for the current work in view of the reluctance of the respondents to
provide all the information required.
Concerning the anthropometric data of the subjects, it was discovered that the average
age of the subjects studied was 28.04 5.28 years. It was interesting to note that 29% of
the sampled group was in the age bracket 20-23 years, which formed the highest
proportion and confirmed that the focus group was largely university students, many of
whom were undergraduates in this age bracket. The remaining composition of the study
group was 26% (24-27 years), 15% (28-31years), 12% (32-35 years), 13% (36-39 years)
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
26/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
22
and 5% (40-43 years). The average shoulder-to-shoulder length of the subject was 46.20
4.51cm. The average arm length was 77.20 5.14 cm while the average shoulder
height from waist was 47.90 4.06cm. The average finger length was 9.36 1.23 cm
while the average body height from ground was 172.10 7.85 cm.
3.2 Procedures and instrumentsThe study was carried out for eight weeks while five days per week was used for data
collection and the other days for planning and analysis of the data. Fourteen cybercafs
were visited where questionnaire and facility layout analysis were done. Efforts were
made to capture as much information as possible, hence, the use of three methods of
data collection: questionnaire, personal interviews and field data collection. A total of
120 questionnaires were administered to staff and customers of the 14 cybercafs while
105 questionnaires were returned. Some information concerning the extra four
cybercafs which made up to 14 were not obtained. Subsequently, we reported
extensive information for only 10 cybercafs. The results from the questionnaires have
been reported in the results section. Personal interviews were conducted with staff and
customers of the cybercafes to support the responses obtained from the questionnaire
method. Ten (five staff operator/cybercafe attendants and five customers) separate
interviews were conducted due to the limitations imposed by the interviewees unwilling
to spend time with the interviewer. However, it was recognized that the cybercafe
attendants/operators have a rich experience on the problems encountered by the
customers in the cybercafes and would distill out the useful parts of these problems to
the interviewer. On the other hand, it was known that first hand information would be
obtained from the customers relevant to the problems being encountered while working
at the cybercafs. Some of the staff and customers were reluctant in documenting their
views, while others were prepared to release information verbally. Personal interviewswere extensively adopted in the data collection process to make up for the shortcoming
of the questionnaire method.
Subjects completed a series of self-report questionnaires that asked for a variety of
information. Separate questionnaires that contain the same questions were administered
to men and women. The separation was for ease of categorizing the different data by sex
of respondents. The questionnaires were designed to capture both the features of the
cybercafes that were important to customers and the effects of utilizing a cybercafe that
were at variance with standards which can inflict injuries and pain on the users. Section
A contained questions relevant to the adequacy or otherwise of chair height, coverage of
chair by foam and leather, height of the computer table, inhalation of fumes fromgenerators, and comfort of the customer in terms of space availability for the activities
that the customer intends to perform. The focus of section B was to understand the
effect of the cybercafe on the customer in terms of eyestrain, headache symptoms and
musculo-skeletal strain. The assumption made in developing section B was that the
side-effects of utilizing the cybercafe were immediately felt by the user and were
directly reflected in the reactions of these customers to such effects. As an extension of
section B, respondents were asked to rate (on a scale 1 to 10) the following according to
the extent to which they are affected when working on the computer: ache, pain,
discomfort. Ache and pains are states of discomfort. Pains could be felt in the body
through the stress or strain on the nerves and veins. It may also evolve as a result of
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
27/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
23
enormous computer activities carried out incessantly. Discomfort is a persistent state or
condition which emanates as a result of the first two.
In order to capture the range of monitor viewing distances that would permit proper
viewing of letters on the monitor without any complaints by the user, a strategy of datacapture in two phases was undertaken. The first phase entailed starting from the
minimum monitor viewing distance and then gradually moving in increments of 10cm,
taking note of the complaints of eye ache, heavy eyes and where the user barely sees
letters displayed on screen. In-between these two extremes is a region where slight
eye ache was felt. This particular region of slight eye ache is then thoroughly
investigated by segmenting the viewing distance into smaller bits. This was done as part
of phase 2.
3.3 MeasurementsActual measurements were made of the various facilities utilized, and comparative
analyses were made with the literature values. Measurements that were collectedincluded body height, shoulder-to-shoulder length, arm length, shoulder height from
waist, and finger length.
Subjects (the 100 people who completed the questionnaires) were tested individually at
their workstations. Workstation dimensions were measured while they were sitting in
front of the computer. Monitor distance was observed; this was the distance from the
centre of the monitor to the eyes when sitting in front of the computer with fingers on
the home row key(s) as well as the viewing angle of the operator from the monitor. The
procedure for measuring the viewing distance of the sampled subjects at the cybercafe
involved observing the viewing distance of the 100 subjects from their monitors in the
range 30 cm to 130 cm from the centre of the monitor using a gradual increment of10cm to 1cm. The viewing angles of subjects were measured while actively working on
the computer. In order to obtain the optimum viewing angle, the 100 subjects had their
monitors tilted in steps of 50
from 150
to 600
and the resulting complaints of the subjects
noted.
A description of the measuring instruments that were used to collect the anthropometric
data is as follows. A measuring tape, which is a flexible form of ruler of a ribbon of
cloth with linear-measurement markings was used to measure distances and lengths of
chairs/desks, body sizes and measurement involving linear dimensions. Due to its
flexibility that allows for a measure of great length, it was easily carried about. Its
length was 300 cm. A second measuring instrument used for the study was a protractor,which aided the measurement of a set of angles, particularly when the viewing angles
and distances of the various respondents from points of reference were to be
determined. In particular, it was used to measure various angles that the respondents
were positioned in a viewing posture.
4 ResultsDuring the survey, various designs of chairs were observed (Figures 1-4), which have
different features. The approach utilized in presenting results provided information that
reported on the following (a) range (maximum and minimum value), (b) the average, (c)
the standard deviation for each of the following major chair dimensions across all the
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
28/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
24
chairs/cybercafes height from floor to top of backrest, height from floor to seat pan,
seat pan width, seat pan depth, height from seat pan to top of backrest, backrest width.
Figure 1. Partial view of Cybercafe XY
Figure 2. Partial view of Cybercafe XYA
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
29/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
25
Figure 3. Partial view of Cybercafe XYB
Figure 4. Partial view of Cybercafe XYC
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
30/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
26
In sum, eight different chairs were analysed and reported in the survey (Table 1).
Similar to the measurements done on different chair types, information for major table
dimensions was obtained and presented in Table 2. In fact two different table types were
captured during the survey.
Table 1. Anthropometric measurements of Chairs
S/No. Description Mean values
(_
x ) cm
Range (R) (minimum
to maximum) cm
Standard deviation
() cm
1. Height from floor
to top of backrest
88.56 69.00 125.00 29.23
2. Height from floor
to seat pan
43.81 41.50 45.50 2.14
3. Seat pan width 41.00 35.00 47.50 14.21
4. Seat pan depth 1.44 1.00 4.50 0.155. Height from seat
pan to top backrest
49.06 34.50 80.00 19.02
6. Backrest width 44.12 25.00 56.00 43.81Number of chair types = 8 (sample size)
Table 2. Anthropmetric measurements of Tables
S/No. Description Mean values in cm Range (R)
cm
Standard
deviation in cm
1 Table height from floorto table top 80.61 58.60-104.90 12.27
2 Table width 62.16 40.90-95.50 15.32
3 Table breadth 179.84 81.80-327.00 81.83
4 Side boarding height 26.28 5.16-8.18 3.32Number of table types = 2
Side boarding is a partition that separates one user from the other while they are using
the same table. Data on the monitor distance and monitor angle were also analysed and
presented here (Tables 3 and 4). Information relevant to (a) range (maximum and
minimum value), (b) the average and, (c) the standard deviation are explored. The otherdata is presented on the viewing angle of people (Table 5). Measurements were taken in
two phases 1 and 2.
Notice that complaints by subjects fall in a range but in certain cybercafs the complaint
is the same. This means that there may be a systemic problem, possibly poor work
design that positions the operator in a way not to observe the displayed information
properly due to space management problems.
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
31/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
27
Table 3. Monitor view distance (cm) (phase 1)
Cybercafe Range (cm )
(minimum-
maximum)
Midpoint
(cm)
Average complaint by the 10 subjects
in each cybercafe
1 31.00-39.00 34.50 Eye ache, heavy eyes
2 40.00-49.00 44.50 Slight eye ache
3 50.00-59.00 54.50 Slight eye ache
4 60.00-69.00 64.50 Slight eye ache
5 70.00-79.00 74.50 Eyes strain
6 80.00-89.00 84.50 Eyes strain
7 90.00-99.00 94.50 Barely sees letters displayed on screen
8 100.00-109.00 104.50 Barely sees letters displayed on screen
9 110.00-119.00 114.50 Barely sees letters displayed on screen
10 120.00-129.00 124.50 Barely sees letters displayed on screenNumber of subjects per cybercafe = 10; this number is taken because of the limitation in data collection.
Generally, there was a difficulty encountered in the collection of data on viewing
distances of users from the monitor. The cybercafe owners and operators viewed the
survey exercise as a distraction to their operations since measurement attempts entailed
moving close to the customer at work and thus forfeiting customers privacy which is
held in high esteem by the operators. Thus, to achieve the aim of this measurement
exercise, a strategy of spending the least possible time in the cybercafe while optimally
utilizing time in measurement was explored. The investigators were constrained to split
the viewing distances measured in each cybercafe across a number of cybercaf outlets
surveyed. We embarked on this strategy as it promoted randomization of measurement.
However, we suggest that future studies should tackle this problem by taking complete
measurements at each cybercaf.
Data concerning the letters displayed on the screen is relevant to the work the user is
doing at the particular time the investigation was carried out.
Table 4. Monitor viewing distance (cm ) (phase 2)
Cybercafe Range (cm )
(minimum-maximum)
Midpoint
(cm )
Average
complaint by the
10 subjects in
each cybercafe1 50.00-59.00 54.50 No complaints
2 60.00-69.00 64.50 No complaints
3 50.00-59.00 54.50 No complaints
4 60.00-69.00 64.50 No complaints
5 50.00-59.00 54.50 No complaints
6 60.00-69.00 64.50 No complaints
7 50.00-59.00 54.50 No complaints
8 60.00-69.00 64.50 No complaints
9 50.00-59.00 54.50 No complaints
10 60.00-69.00 64.50 No complaints
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
32/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
28
Number of subjects per cybercafe = 10. Notice that the standard deviation is about 9 for
all the cybercafs in both phase 1 and phase 2.
The decision as to which cyber caf was given 50-59cm and which was given 60-69cm
was made randomly as a result of the constraint on data collection in cyber cafes. It isthought that a good representation of the data collection could be made if smaller ranges
of values of viewing distances were spread across all the cyber cafs. Phase 2 was
carried out with a focus on the possible distance in which the customer experienced the
least discomfort.
Table 5. Viewing angle of people (degrees)
No of subjects
(people)
Mean viewing
angle (degree )
Comments from subjects
1-10 15 Slight neck pain
11-20 20 No visibility of letters on screen21-30 25 Little changes in visibility of letters on screen
31-40 30 No pains at least for a period of 6 hrs
41-50 35 No pains at least for a period of 6 hrs
51-60 40 No pains at least for a period of 6 hrs
61-70 45 Slight neck pains
71-80 50 No visibility of letters on screen
81-90 55 Little changes in visibility of letters on screen
91-100 60 Heavy neck painsSample size = 100. Subjects in 10 cybercafes. Note standard deviation is zero for all entries
It was noted that very little information existed on the statistics presented here. Whenmore than 50% of the class members comment on a complaint, the same is taken as
representative of the group. For instance, more than 50% of the subjects in the mean
viewing angle of the 150
category complained of slight neck pain. This is taken as
representative of the group. From field experiments, the majority of people who utilized
an extensive period working on the computer usually engaged in about 6 hours of work.
For ease of reference and classification, 6 hours was used as a point within which the
effects of using the computer were measured. Other results of anthropometric data of
cybercafe users presented in this section relate to means and standard deviations of
actual measures of subjects including anthropometric features such as shoulder-to-
shoulder, arm length, shoulder height from waist, finger length and height of subjects,
This, aided by the tape rule measurements, presents an idea of anthropometric features
of the sampled population. The data are shown in Table 6.
As indicated in the method section for the measurement of viewing distance of sampled
subjects, for the range 31cm to 39cm, the subjects complained of eye ache and heavy
eyes. However, in the viewing distance of the range 40cm to 49cm, the subjects were
fairly comfortable and only complained of slight eye ache. For high and low tables and
chairs, although the viewing distance may not be much affected, however, the tilting
angle would change. In the range 50cm to 59cm, the complaint by subjects was still
limited to slight eye ache. The same complaint was repeated for the range 60cm to
69cm. However, when the viewing distance of 70cm to 80cm was observed, the
complaint was persistent eyestrain instead of the slight nature of eye ache from 50cm
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
33/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
29
upwards. It was suggested that 50cm and 70cm were the turning points, representing a
possible range of values to further investigate in order to obtain the optimum viewing
distance of computer users in cybercafes for the group presented in this work. Further,
in the range 80cm to 89cm, the subjects still complained of eyestrain. In the range 90cm
to 99cm, the subjects could barely see the letters displayed on the screen. However, inthe ranges 100cm to 109cm, 110cm to 119cm, and 120cm to 129cm, the complaint by
the subjects was uniform, which stated that they could no longer see letters displayed
except the light from the screen. The phase 2 of the work made use of repeated
procedures for determining the appropriate viewing distance but focusing on the ranges
50cm to 59cm and 60cm to 69cm. It was observed that none of the 100 subjects
complained within these ranges.
From the survey, both the average table height and chair heights were in the range
52cm80cm and 40cm60cm, respectively. The seating (chair) height of 53.3 9.14 cm
fell within the boundary of the range obtained by Shikdar and Al-Hadhrami (2007),
which indicates a seating chair height of 43-56cm. However, the upper boundary maybe exceeded. The table height obtained fell within the literature value of Shikdar and
Al-Hadhrami (2007), which showed table height of 70-105cm (from field experience).
This was slightly different from XYC as shown in Figure 4.
Table 6. Anthropometric features of subjects
S/No. Description Mean values for
subjects (_
x )
Standard
deviation
for subjects ()
Range (i.e.
minimum and
maximum)
1. Age 28.04 yrs 5.28 yrs 20.00 40.00 yrs
2. Shoulder-to-shoulder 46.20cm 4.51 cm 37.00 52.00cm
3. Arm length 77.20cm 5.14cm 66.00 84.00cm
4. Shoulder height from
waist
47.90cm 4.06cm 20.00 54.00cm
5. Finger length 9.36cm 1.23cm 8.00 12.00cm
6. Height 172.10cm 7.85cm 161.00 183.00cm
5 DiscussionMost of the pitfalls of the cybercafe design were due to the poor design of cybercafe
chairs. In the following highlighted points, a set of recommendations are made, which
emerged from the study comparing the anthropometrics of the users to the dimensions
of the desk/chair, as shown in points 1 to 5 and point 7. However, point 6 emerged from
the literature. (1) The height of the chair was too low (see Table 1, where the height
from the floor to seat pan is 43.81 cm). It was not convenient for short people in that
there is a marked difference between the gap created when seated on the chair and
working on the table to process computer work. This problem could be solved if the
height from floor to top of backrest could be increased to 95.00cm, the height from floor
to seat pan could be changed to 45.00cm, or the seat pan width could be increased to
42.00cm while the depth could still be retained at the current dimension. The height
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
34/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
30
from seat pan to top backrest could increase to 50.00cm. The backrest width may still be
maintained at 44.12cm. However, a more acceptable action is to provide an adjustable
chair; (2) The backrest was not covered with foam and leather, causing the customers
back to rest directly on the metallic frame; (3) The backrest was also not big enough to
support the customers back (see Table 1, with backrest width as 44.12 cm); (4) thebackrest did not serve the customer at all in the typing position: in the typing position,
customers had to stoop forward; (5) Since the legs of the chairs were too low (see Table
1, where the height from the floor to seat pan is 43.81 cm), the effects of the reaction of
the chair against the buttocks of the customer was felt more than in high chairs. It was
observed that for the high chair, the reaction was distributed and the effect of the
reaction felt by the customer was reduced. However, for the short chair, the reaction
was concentrated and had more effects than the high chair. (6) An additional
shortcoming of the cybercaf design was that the computer monitor was above the eye
level of customers at sitting position (Bergqvist and Knave, 1994). This was not good
enough, as the customer must tilt his or her head and neck up through an angle to view
the monitor. This position was inconvenient and tiring. Whenever the head was tilted,and remained in the same position for a long time, pain would be felt on the spinal cord
and this made customers get tired easily and even affected the health of customers. (7)
Another flaw of the design was that the chair was not provided with an arm rest (Table
1 shows no results on armrest since it was not encountered in the survey). The elbow of
the customer therefore dangled in the air while typing, and the biceps muscles were
greatly stressed trying to keep the hand hanging in space.
The literature value for angular movement of 45o, back support tilt of 30
oand elbow
support height of 23-33cm has not been confirmed or disproved by the survey. A
comparative analysis of results obtained with those reported in Goonetilleke and
Feizhou (2001) reported chair height of between 31-33cm adequate for the South Chinaregion Chinese population, which seemed lower than the range of values obtained from
this survey. The data collected for the current study showed that the height of the chair
from seat pan to top backrest is 49.06cm (range: 34.50-80.00cm, standard deviation:
19.02cm). The height of the chair from floor to top of backrest was observed to have a
mean of 88.56cm (range: 69.00-125.00cm, standard deviation: 29.23cm). The height
from floor to seat pan was 43.81 (range: 41.40-45.50cm, standard deviation of 2.14cm).
In the cybercaf industry, space was a great limitation. However, some cybercaf
operators optimized the use of their space thereby providing less comfort for the user
while others did not take advantage of space. Figure 2 showed an appreciable space
economy demonstrated by the cybercaf by positioning the system unit on a shelf while
only the monitor, keyboard (Smith and Cronin, 1993) and mouse were positioned on the
table. Unfortunately, space was not fully utilized this way in cybercafs XY, XYB and
XYC (Figures 1, 3 and 4) since the system units often competed with the customer for
space as the customers leg positions during browsing were restrained.
5.1 Ideal/Proposed sitting position at cybercafeFrom extensive literature scanning and field experience, a possible sitting posture which
reveals posture features such as distance of customers eye position from monitor,
sitting height, chair height and other ergonomic features indicate that a cyber caf could
be designed according to standards by regulatory authorities. In summary, the following
features were reflections of a standard sitting posture emerging from the study
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
35/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
31
comparing the anthropometrics of the users to the dimensions and positions of the
monitor, chair/desk: (1) The top of the monitor should be placed at eye level for proper
head and neck position (Bergqvist and Knave, 1994); (2) Back rest should be covered
with foam and leather and the backrest positioned in such a way that it is always utilized
(Carter and Banister, 1994); (3) The chair should be high enough (about 1.44cm) and aconsiderable portion of hip and thigh (on the average of about 41.00cm) supported by it
in order to reduce the reaction on customers hips (Toomingas and Govhed, 2008); (4)
Chair height should be adjustable to allow for extreme height e.g. very short or very tall
(Toomingas and Govhed, 2008; Nag et al., 2008); (5) Arm rest should be available to
support the elbow during typing (Chen et al., 1994; Human and Rempel, 1995); (6)
Hand rest should be at the same level with the keyboard; (7) There should be no leg
restrictions under the table to restrict free movement of customers legs; (8) Footrest
should be such that it supports the leg and may best be positioned such that the knee is
bent at 900
at work, a position that requires minimum energy loss at work (Eruksrud and
Bohannon, 2003).
6 Conclusion, study limitations and future studiesThis paper has presented a framework for the ergonomic evaluation of cybercafs with
particular reference to those located within the territory of an academic environment in
a developing country. It was discovered that the cybercaf chairs of many of the
cybercafs visited was the major pitfall of the caf design. This was due to the fact that
chairs were too short, no hand rest was provided and there was no significant backrest.
Other shortcomings of the design included the fact that the chairs were stationary as
opposed to roller chairs. There were restrictions to the movement or positioning of
customers legs under the table; the workspace was too small and the top of computer
monitor was above eye level of an average height customer. This is a new contributionto knowledge in the area of cybercaf design in the developing country context. The
area is worthy of further empirical analysis. The information presented in the study
would improve customer satisfaction thereby guaranteeing patronage and should have
positive economic implications, which may affect companys profits. In order to attain
competitiveness, cybercafs should be designed in a customer-friendly manner. In this
work we have evaluated designs and suggested inputs as indicated in the section on
results that would make customers more comfortable while using the Internet in a
cybercafe. Although no cost analysis was made, the suggestion are however practicable.
This research has some limitations. An important drawback of the work is the lack of
sufficient reliability due to the limited number of respondents. For an academic and
theory-based work, it may require a sample of over 350 subjects to effectively examine
hypotheses. Future studies may improve on this. Another important issue in cybercaf
design is to permit an acceptable level of air circulation/flow and ventilation for
maximum efficiency at the cybercaf workstation. From field visits, it is observed that
ventilation in many cybercafs in Nigeria is very poor. However, the issue of ventilation
in cybercaf design was not covered in the study. Also, noise, in terms of location of
cybercafs away from noise sources such as generators, noisy markets, car
garages/parks, etc, which may reduce concentration at work, hence productivity, at
cybercaf workstation, has been omitted in this study. Further studies may cover this.
Tables 3 and 4 show a non-overlapping set of ranges. We thought that the range was a
8/3/2019 ESSA Vol 22 1 2010
36/61
Ergonomics SA, 2010, 22(1)
ISSN Number : 10-10-2728
32
convenient means of measurement and hence used the range. This is an observed
weakness of the study. It is suggested that other statistical measures could be used to
avoid this prob