Agiles 2009 - Agile PMO

  • View
    1.187

  • Download
    0

  • Category

    Business

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Many companies nowadays had embraced agile practices in their core methodologies and are seeing improvements in the way they manage expectations with their customers or in their product quality as well. Is there anything left to achieve in the path of continuous improvement? Followed by Lord Kelvin’s famous quote "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it.", Ariel Schapiro, PMO at Southworks, will introduce a process that helped him on measuring project’s health with Key Performance Indicators focused at improving a service-based business. This scenario usually requires more measurements than velocity, burndown and burnup charts in order to enhance aspects of the projects such as the daily work organization, awareness of the big picture, knowledge sharing and progress-seeking spirit. Ariel will explore the process in which these indicators are measured and its incremental nature. Also how PM’s from different teams are collaboratively engaged on this engineering approach on agile practices. As corollary, a statistical analysis will help on drawing the conclusions of the efficiency of this process. Target audience: Scrum practitioners, PMO members, project managers, developers and process owners Key benefits: - Understand indicators beyond velocity, burndown and burnup in order to measure project’s performance in service-based businesses. - Get a sense of the application of engineering practices to agile contexts.

Citation preview

Ariel Schapiro

Agile PMO”improving projects health”

Context

Health Check measurement

process

Results & Conclusions

Q&A

Plan

¿?

CONTEXT

Southworks.NET

ISO 9001:2000

x 4

Projects

Reference implementation applications

.NETTraining Kits

Hands on labsSaaS (S+S)

WCF

WFSilverlight

Identity Windows Azure

WPF

SCRUM-like Process

Iteration Backlog

Customer participation

Weekly meetings schedule

(2~3 months total duration)

TDD

Pair Programming

Continuous Improvement

HEALTH CHECKMEASUREMENT PROCESS

Anatomy of the process

Formal Process(ISO, CMMi)

Hard Indicators

Customer feedback

Retrospective Services

Hard IndicatorsTeam self assesment

based on thresholds

and backed up by evidence.

Hard Indicators

Hard Indicators

RetrospectiveServices

Retrospective Services

•Good…•Poor…•Consider…

Customer feedback

Customer feedback

Anatomy of the process

Formal Process(ISO, CMMi)

Hard Indicators

Customer feedback

Retrospective Services

RESULTS &CONCLUSIONS

Results

Age (weeks)

Results

Results

"The project map helped me to understand the global scope of the project and to know easily

what are we working on right now.“

“These assets really help me on planning ahead the testing process."

"Screencasts were and still are very useful for me to go over the progress made during the sprint.“

Conclusions

• Improvement because of:– Self measurement: reflecting– Osmotic communication (Alistair Cockburn) at a

company level• Scrum + engineering practices• Valuable initiatives imitation• Sharing + Reusability

Thanks!

Ariel Schapiroariel.schapiro@southworks.net

http://blogs.southworks.net/aschapiro/