6.-( ~ ' o~ ~ S§ , 0 C', , ~,

o~c& l:

i~,.l. .uIt~.b~i't

~~'\

~ '~, ~6.-"(~ S§ ," 0 C', , ~,5 c ,~ i ~:=g _-S).g r ~ \0

~ ~ S :: ~ ji ~5 ~ ,t~ t.l' l ~ ~+. -. G ~.;: (\~,~ Sl~ -w 'ß ~ ~-l ~. ~~ '\ -g. t

~ . 3 %~ l ~~ u- ~" T :'~ ~'~~t ~. \~.ç.

L£, --.

iiEJirø.uncrl member lulIa' Pattersorr; ;;

~~~;p'~:Citfl:,;ir~~.,:. '.. .. ....,'~.~..,..._ "'.~',.'. g"~"';;:'~";'xc".i~~ .,Z'",,;:."~clft~hlfe"ôvef'300 citizens who have already vôiced their oppösitfòìi'tó-lhÎs'rezone

This is wrong to let ONE DEVELOPER to override Critical Areas Ordinance, all because he wants too much

development on his property. This is a terrible precedent for King County. We must uphold our ideals,

and protect the ENVIRONMENT first. "'~~~~~",)fJsberi~s. Eien\tsin2le-salmon who travers up,the 500s' creek must pass-through or along this Race.way",.;;:.!,..... ".'

Pler .CAO was created for this very situation. One landslide is all it wil take, and this rezone proposal allows

Pacific Raceways to cut trees on steep slopes which will allow landslides, on slopes that have already

suffered major failures. This proposal also allows more wetlands to be filled in, allows the developer toreduce buffers with neighboring properties. There is not one surface storm water pond on over 300

acres. This is questionable treatment and storage of surface water runoff, and storm water is already

running down the slopes into the creek from giant French drains installed around 1996.

And since this developer does his permit requests in parts he has not even got a MASTER DRAINAGE

PLAN. ~ll~InG~'1lØa(¡~1IrW6RlflQltif3riti~ï;~ili;e~s:allcf~ih~Sø.QStÆte~$iawital.."'fff

criti~l,ar:~~..:/~--/Ni~:~/ .,,71.,,;'-'". -',

",~~~t~~~_~,~se. A conditional use permit is needed,since the noise pollution affects all landowners for MILES. In fact, this is one of the main reasons thatthis entire proposal in all its forms is unfair. It allows one person to pollute the atmosphere for

thousands. 'ff~d:ttiønaLW:sedi?ermiFm'tst'becontiñtJe'd;and"tipheld:.. PlêfSé' arlÖ'M)'M'6Rli

~",IlE;~ËI!~Sfæ. Do not abdicate your responsibilty as elected leaders.

This Racetrack has been there for decades, true. I am not saying to close the racetrack, but it should notbe allowed to expand, it is not appropriate for the location. Please put this Ordinance in the trash canand stop wasting public money on it. It wil not stand UP in court.

This is NOT FAIR to other King County residents who obey the law, leave their trees, don't fill in their

wetlands. As one individual, I had to spend about 4K dollars to shore up a tree that was leaning

TOWARD the creek. This developer is getting special rights and treatment.

Please do the right thing. VOTE NO.

Thank you,

Leah Boehm

&A

We the undersigned request that:

1) The King County Council enforce and uphold the Conditional Use Permit (A-71-0-81, April

'30, 1984) granted to Pacific

Racew

ays. Specifically, but not lim

ited to: The required quiet days of M

onday and Tuesday; T

he required posting of one quietw

eekend day each month, M

ay through Septem

ber; The cessation of noise by the required tim

e; Noise reduction requirem

ents;O

nsite monitoring and ongoing noise studies.

2) The K

ing County C

ouncil RE

JEC

T proposed O

rdinance #2010-0189, or any proposed raceway expansion. D

ue to theC

ounty's approval of many established residential developm

ents, ovedhe years, raceway expansion is an incom

patible use thatw

ould impact a large residential area. It creates landslide hazards and endangers salm

on spawning grounds.

ÛO

f, ç;kev~J4L- I t$4-l4. S

E :3 ~

~o"'T

-

. -- 73 i r- f) L

/ 3;i, ( d- S' ¡"i-. J t'¡,.- -

It. M.

.) 7 Pc

"D. ~

~vt;,-~

~iu.. 1\ 6:1

\\Ll.tr r0X

l\ ~" 't t: c¿R.1 \ ~ t \ \ s

t:r~

¿. S'-U~,1 ?LmJt¿?phvi.fi1foLI ~I\

e cür-c/\~''t

GS

__G~

f0~.n.A

L-') I't~

Lh\~. Ý

1./) /I ' \. /. ~

. ì I ~U

i I /. " --,, A I-l~ ¡ í "'¡..C'

32/i-L'... /' . ,.

( 7 r ~4~zs'£I_)c/(L-A

;(-L

~- --"

., -_of

._--.'''

P i A

VG

fv; (;0 'JrrSN

(Lv

C(-¡~V

IN:_~(è '!tfoO

,llfV

Ca.l-

.I l-f LA / J ""Go

jS

E :Jac¡rH

s,-

, ~c)/M

/¿) 6/4 5E

~J. 'ì'Îl-l s:

17/)

¿J~

'1iPC) &;' /~Cr?-

YÓ

5e-ej~l.í1er

..". ß òx.

.~ crte p-n de Q co lYcc¡s+' n-ei;

1211l- 5.1:. 3orL-tsL

.



30, 1984) granted to Pacific

Raceways. Specifically, but not limited to: The required quiet.

days of Monday and T

uesday; The required posting of one quiet

weekend day each m

onth, May through S

eptember; T

he cessation of noise by the required time; N

oise reduction requirements;

Onsite m

onitoring and ongoing noise studies.2) T

he King C

ounty Council R

EJE

CT

proposed Ordinance #2010-0189, or any proposed racew

ay expansion. Due to the

County's approval of m

any established residential developments, over the years, racew

ay expansion is an incompatible use that

would im

pact a large residential area. It creates landslide hazards and endangers salmon spaw

ning grounds.

Print Name I Address I ' Signature I Emàll~ddrèss

IcY 3;1,j s¿

M#j¡

~i(Vt /

I..1-'

. .(7) L.PJJÝ

I/M e Æ

l)¿ 1&Jd1

~,,/...0;'~~I~.l(u-ji £ L ¿u'.d-- ~ t- ~

v¡1?~ .6 a.:1"~

L~ C

S A

Ro.l\ £(i(o..,V

\ces 1'"''(l i

\(


1) The K

ing County C

ouncil enforce and uphold the Conditional U

se Perm

it (A-71-0-81, A

pril 30, 1984) granted to Pacific

Racew






ay through Septem



ents;O


2) The K

ing County C

ouncil RE

JEC

T proposed O


ue to theC


ents, over the years, raceway expansion is an incom

patible use thatw



~. 417f 9~cJY

'Î I '~, po i... r 5 ' ,,~ c .L'.. / ,I /' "e i . ' .: () l) i; c-' ¿

¡ /".l ~ ¡r.

; \ L\ 4 J ~'I \ t: ~\ 1 h-

,.~ \~\A ~ \')vv- L

ý l-, ¿\jc, L

b/'tt-//Jrr! 1JJ~~

)(f- 1/?iZ(

-~ 1

.,jiUJ..

R/c# lÄcll

,.- /L/l L Ý\

/1'~.'1i7 n (~o p-f V

,

70 ~\; q h ç~ tJI= v

Wore- ~G

-tL

j;1 J1~

3 d-~!5¡; s.t. -=

YL ~

Sf

i s-¡-/ Hik 5:£

~Vo3' /96-riw

€.SJ'lld/ SE

d3/~ If¡LA

4-btLr' n q~tJq

/7 rzi '5 C' .3 ~ / ~..' ,s'#'

/l (; hL/ at-':3. 0 (j 3-

.(¿ (_l~ \, '\ i- u. W- C

:)s 0 7 ')

/7c20( 513 33(s-sr

fJu. ri r~ tJ î ¿

I 1 ). (/ / .s .? .:i:.I-: ¡-/) Cp-,G'-( 7' vi 0/ i-

uimcw /,)if

e (lIt' í 5~ c~ "Y c7"l~

t-ocmCj raw e msn, co

77(~¡t4'I..Ð "IOW!"., Co e~


1) The King County Council enforce and uphold the'Conditional Use Permit (A-71-0-81, April


Racew






ay through Septem



ents;O


2) The K

ing County C

ouncil RE

JEC

T proposed O


ue to theC



patible use thatw



Print Nam

eA

ddréss',

SignatureE

maU

Address

U A I wft

'P¿~ec-iL ~e- -t rs

l ~Y

l 19'tll~~~~.b~i~ __~d~r' e~'(~,

jOO

¡S5S i€ ~d-Y tApL


1) The K

ing County C

ouncil enforce and uphold the' Conditional U

se Perm

it (A-71-0-81, A

pril 30, 1984) granted to Pacific

Racew






ay through Septem



ents;O


'2) The K

ing County C

ouncil RE

JEC

T proposed O


ue to theC



patible use thatw



Print Name I Address' "i ,Signature I

Em

aUA

ddress .

C e A

~ S

oei ~ ) '-'- 1'- -S

IJ / t ii / fju.!at W-f 'fkf1'2~~ ~/ Il I / /1/

!Zø

/ieY' ljehdY

'/)( 5z.i107 /7fff Avp çr I lX

~ ~

WØ

2.Ib(~S

A 'l('îl.e La,., :.Q

r€

~,ll-abl1 I'~~

1- \ \Lt l) \.It L

vf

k.evin ScW

-t

134-ft S€ 34-2AJ sr

A v bv /"11, w

A 'i §c 7 i-

:J3odp / l1)7 1lV- se

/Ju biN rv Iv fi f t'o 7 ~

/Ç1'rt. ,A~. SL;

3 2,'510 1/)~~

tfW~

'" 5L'-

A iJ 15(. !tv. /vA

33/ö7 tS Lakv lk"" O

rihA

~ "V

~ ~

.7 ~A

X/ i

~.v' . ~

~

l~r-/"lO

t-t:s.( t£ LoM(.S

+-. n.Æ

~/l,w4'-d hpp, th

M \ \Lt£ \Ji rLi-

~,~

77" 4i Cc l(-h




Raceways. Specifically, but not

limited to: T

he requireø quiet days of M




ay through Septem

ber; The cessatibnf-noise by the required tim


ents;O


2) The K

ing County C

ouncil RE

JEC

T proposed O


ue to theC



patible use thatw



"'~åj~t~t+-"',j"'''''')'''''':':'::~/i'I:''';''''i:?':,:':

",: ',,.,,:'.,..,'

",,,,,..ù,,.,..,, ' .'. .'.."'..,.'.'.',..,, , '.' ,"

Lj \.dtt vJ.o,j.tV\

( 0,)

ß R,Ai/ I

/3.I¿c't 6. C

J~ft

L12!J~ Ì). E

r-\' e.

~'i; t\ /,'1/1 7 ('e V'

'16 sE.~

Il( i¡ I L( S t: ~t $-11

hf'CèJ~

U1t!kt: ~

ye:LrJ().cC'''

JlJ fba¿jd~1$120 /JiftPL

1£

.c: 11ll-Lt2~ 5t M

", ,13 ()~

;).2¿)Lj;z J 70&

?l.7ifl~1

,A l.ltJ l (,o/).

31//:2 'LfS-lA

-Ue: S

f:. .A

/T w

IT 9 'K

(j l--L7$( 1/2. ll-C

¡ !JVf s. E

.

/l.flT wA qr;Oo/Â

17C¡û/ SE 33/s+-Cf..

It Ub()rtt , 4J f1 qt or 2

32~oq /Gt¡-t1t 4~5'~

4vD.1f W

¿¡ 'l-r-

;.££ H-TG-JMJJeHo7M4i ¡4-(j~

c.~~q~.~

;¿~JV~

;t~¿¿ (-:(Ç GJ, COM

/ ¿ IjÁØ

ft\e (! co I'Ctstive.t-

(r Olll. \J Z NIlI'

M~~UID~IDYou will soon vote on pro rdinance File # 2010-0189 The proposed Ordinanceprovides no protection for the citizens of King County who live nearby. It does notreflect the previous Conditional Use Permits that control hours of noise. It would, in fact, create

a new industrial zone with major new expansion of the RacewayEnclosed with this letter are petitions from dozens of neighbors of Pacific Raceways.To make a long story short, there are two very large concerns for us...

G¡vye at ~ ~ ~ l; ~.JÅ (b -, l Gt'l,'l'6&U - ù ' - -, - o. W\ ()1le.The first concern is the fact that Kina County is not enforcina the current , ,conditional use oermits The fact is, with no enforcement action taken against the track for c. ~ , ~

the repeated violations of the Conditional Use Permit under which they operate, the continuedviolations reduce our quality of life, as well as the value of our properties.1. The require quiet days of Monday and Tuesday have not been observed or

enforced. I can forward to you supporting evidence of code complaints that wentnowhere. The raceway is louder than ever. They have loud racing every day ofthe week.

Dear Reagan Dunn,

2. The required posting of 1 quiet weekend day each month, May throughSeptember has not been fulfilled to date. Even though they were told to post oneday per month, nothing has happened and no one in King County enforces this.

3. The cesation of all noise by eleven PM has atso not been fulfiHed by Pac

Raceways, and they often are making noise before 9am.

Our second main concern is the proposed Ordinance, File # 2010-0189 that hasalready been read to King County Council. According to this reion's

representative council member Peter Von Reichbauer, "The propoed ordinance ISunde review by th County Councl (the ET Commitee) and th Count Exece,"

We hereby requestL That King County enforce CUP A-71-0-81 from April 30, 1985

b The Ordinance File #: 2010-0189, refer to and create conditions to enforce and upholdthe Conditional Use Permit (A-71-0-81, April 30, 1984) granted to Pacific Raceways.

L. That we have a voice in the making, acceptance, or rejection of thisordinance. WE DO NOT WANT TO WAIT UNTIL IT is PASSED. It needs to becorrected beforehand. There are serious issues in this proposal thatwill adversely affect the lives of hundreds of families living in and around thetrack. Moreover there is objectionable language in the ordinance as it now iswritten. The Ordinance provides NO protection for the citizens of KingCounty who live nearby.

~::~e~~u~%, ) eO. L, b~ "'~ 't~1-~ \ , ~

~~ ~ lI ~V~bY j\~Pd-~.s s\~~ ~'£ y,,\I.I

l ~

We, the undersigned, are requesting that:The proposed new Ordinance File # 2010-0189 refer to and createconditions to enforce and uphold the Conditional Use Permit (A-71-0-81, April 30, 1984) granted to Pacific Raceways.

This permit has not been enforced by King County up to this date:1. The required quiet days of Monday and Tuesday have not been observedor enforced (CUP condition 1.a) .2. The required posting of 1 quiet weekend day each month, May throughSeptember has not been fulfilled to date (CUP condition b.2)3. The cessation of all noise by eleven PM has also not been fulfilled by PacRaceways.

B. 'That King County holds a full public hearing on the new proposedordinance and the Pacific Raceways petition for expanded trackfacilties and racing schedule (Pacific Raceways Proposed Ordinance2010-1089).

,j'

2.

3.

t!-tf¡~L,~

4 ìf If5. .~6. ¡i1 ' .sIL ~ tJt,

7. i.fFt 9lJf:

8. e¡ Oct1.

~/\

if~J

~

~~We, the undersigned, are requesting that:The proposed new Ordinance File # 2010-0189 refer to and createconditions to enforce and uphold the Conditional Use Permit (A-71-0-81, April 30, 1984) granted to Pacific Raceways.

This oermit has not been enforced by Kino County up to this date:1. The required quiet days of Monday and Tuesday have not been observedor enforced (CUP condition La) ,2. The required posting of 1 quiet weekend day each month, May throughSeptember has not been fulfilled to date (CUP condition b.2)3. The cessation of all noise by eleven PM has also not been fulfilled by PacRaceways.

B. 'That King County holds a full public hearing on the new proposedordinance and the Pacific Raceways petition for expanded trackfacilities and racing schedule (Pacific Raceways Proposed Ordinance2010-1089).

King County response to Pacific Racewavs must include:1. All conditions required in the present Conditional Use Permit(A-71-0-81) ,."k.2. All, if not updated, noise reduction requirements set forth in the PacificRaceway Track Relocation CUP (L08CUQ06).3. All, if not updated, environmental setbacks and noise barrier reductioncontained in ;foth above permits and environmental protection for the LittleSoos Creek.

1.

2.

4.

'"11/2. '1'6 ll(if. 5. f, l:t/JT

3l ). ( gUi Av~ S,E l~t-

3 J (01 t 4~~ A~ S if, kel"+/ v-y/f 5r 3/¿-(I Sf AiL~

,__-. ----..--.

LI5Qfrè: hCA 6.~1~Fro \;c; 7. ~ ,,'"0 ~ ~8. '/,d

tI ~..\L ß ~

~We, the undersigned, are requesting that:The proposed new Ordinance File # 2010-0189 refer to and createconditions to enforce and uphold the Conditional Use Permit (A-71-0-81, April 30, 1984) granted to Pacific Raceways.

This permit has not been enforced by King County up to this date:1. The required quiet days of Monday and Tuesday have not been observedor enforced (CUP condition 1.a) .

/ 2. The required posting of 1 quiet weekend day each month, May through

September has not been fulfiled to date (CUP condition b.2)3. The cessation of all noise by eleven PM has also not been fulfiled by PacRaceways.

B. That King County holds a full public hearing on the new proposedordinance and the Pacific Raceways petition for expanded trackfacilities and racing schedule (Pacific Raceways Proposed Ordinance2010-1089).

King County response to Pacific Raceways must include:1. All conditions required in the present Conditional Use Permit(A-71-0-81) j2. All, if not updated, noise reduction requirements set forth in the Pacific

. Raceway Track Relocation CUP (L08CU006).3. All, if not updated, environmental setbacks and noise barrier reductioncontained in both above permits and environmental protection for the LittleSoos c~:eM

1. Rú-2.

ClWiJ-

q~d-. ß, ./:30:15 f J9'?-./l S£ 9ß'/z

0o¿(~ /Jti ,4,,5E' 92ó~3ó7d¿/ l'Iflh Avl, 5£ l(Il~ /JA- 9lJíJl\ l i I

3ot¡tf'f J l¡ ø-l

t~ ~~AV

f'iWe, the undersigned, are'requesting that:

The proposed new Ordinance File # 2010-0189 refer to and createconditions to enforce and uphold the Conditional Use Permit (A-71-0-81, April 30, 1984) granted to Pacific Raceways.

This permit has not been enforced by King County up to this date:1. The required quiet days of Monday and Tuesday have not been observedor enforced (CUP condition 1.a)2. The required posting of 1 quiet weekend day each month, May throUghSeptember has not been fulfilled to date (CUP condition b.2)3. The cessation of all noise by eleven PM has also not been fulfiled by PacRaceways.


King County response to Pacific Raceways must include:1. All conditions required in the present Conditional Use Permit(A-71-0-81)2. All, if not updated, noise reduction requirements set forth in the PacificRaceway Track Relocation CUP (L08CU006).3. All, if not updated, environmental setbacks and noise barrier reductioncontained in both above permits and environmental protection for the Little5005 Creek. ~,,'i ""'~oti- ~'J 2.~r¡Gf C llr(¿ llv (12 ~.iFAr(()4I 13Lr¿?;/~~y-~

tl,J'':';'' 3:. ~ );u'V$\j..t§' \-\'í S G: ~~~~~ c'"" W-~oi:e~ìl'L 3(,:;i~ '3\;:-\ ~t f"'e~~,ú1. Ý 8();).;5.~ )t1Sb'ZIo iid- 3aò ~ AW 'S~ ~ W'õ; qJoSJ

10\ '- S \t l\ 1 h, (\ S5l¡

6.

7.

8.

J I Q i _ (-ea ~ bùe WV "/_.._ -e clc, VI \K 0 e. vi/~ ~ íl ti '- vvCi ( J .;253- 3 3 ~ - () p; 3 & ~(!

~t\ IJ ,r¿~ 'l ~

\, 'v (llll "( .-6/ 1// g'We, the undersigned, are requesting that:

(j

Yu "The proposed new Ordinance File # 2010-0189 refer to and createconditions to enforce and uphold the Conditional Use Permit (A-71-0-81, April'30, 1984) granted to Pacific Raceways.

This permit has not been enforced by King County up to this date:1. The required quiet days of Monday and Tuesday have not been observedor enforced (CUP condition La)2. The required posting of 1 quiet weekend day each month, May throughSeptember has not been fulfilled to date (CUP condition b.2)3. The cessation of all noise by eleven PM has also not been fulfilled by PacRaceways.

B. 'That King County holds a full public hearing on the new proposedordinance and the Pacific Raceways petition for expanded trackfacilities and racing schedule (Pacific Raceways Proposed Ordinance2010-1089).

Kino County response to Pacific Racewavs must include:1. All conditions required in the present Conditional Use Permit(A-71 -0-81)2. All, if not updated, noise reduction requirements set forth in the PacificRaceway Track Relocation CUP (L08CU006).3. All, if not updated, environmental setbacks and noise barrier reductioncontained in both above permits and environmental protection for the LittleSoos ree.

CJ,~k W1LLA

3. E r-r'c cUr'I/9rc

4. 'Itlidt .6" (i~~..Ezg~

5. /l\UiUl- ~ o- eh

hi 6. 30¥st ¡,i? Av SE.

~5)f v)A 9 Y¿?%i - '¥~ 0 ;L

AI/7.

c1S- 3 ~ 3 / "' /s 78. /

fbWe, the undersigned, are requesting that:

.

The proposed new Ordinance File # 2010-0189 refer to and createconditions to 'en~orce and upl:old the Conditional Use Permit (A-71-0-81, April 30, 1984) granted to Pacific Raceways.


B. That King County holds a full public hearing on the new proposed. ordinance and the Pacific Raceways petition for expanded trackfacilities and racing schedule (Pacific Raceways Proposed Ordinance2010-1089).

King County response to Pacific Raceways must include:1. All conditions required in the present Conditional Use Permit(A-71-0-81)2. All, if not updated, noise reduction requirements set forth in the PacificRaceway Track Relocation CUP (L08CU006).3. All, if not updated, environmental setbacks and noise barrier reductioncontained in both above permits and environmental protection for the LittleSoos Creek.

2.

1. S;loo7 /(,?'? ý.F y; ~(¿lN/ fAJr,

3;;11;) It/1ní Å-G36 '~Pr WJ

320 /bf7AAve$F ,/,I?v'

~J3.~ ¡4bv.r.q~:i

7. r8. ~~t;~ 0~UiA~S~Wt\lt~ t'H2L S¿W--M~~ 22tf1L

tI

l¿¥tl (lf~

".

W7We, the undersigned, are requesting that:

The proposed new Ordinance File # 2010-0189 refer to and createconditions to enforce and uphold the COlJditional Use Permit (A-71-0-81, April 30, 1984) granted to Pacific Raceways.

This permit has not been enforced by King County UP to this date:1. The required quiet days of Monday and Tuesday have not been observedor enforced (CUP condition La)2. The required posting of 1 quiet weekend day each mu-nth, May throughSeptember has not been fulfilled to date (CUP condition b.2)3. The cessation of all noise by eleven PM has also not been fulfilled by PacRaceways.



1.~~ ~-1A~ ~/l¡tc.1f U-/TROJS Y;1:JLi¿ //7ô7ß?¿,f,-f~~ ~ ~ .2.i2,., ~~~l 'rDÌ1M l¿riS+-t-~ (Á )qt~ 3ri?J.o ll'rAvt-st

3. (;) ::oi2- ~ \ 3WO~

5.

4. ~'\O\-tlAtlt :)/","S6"\ ~ Loob I b ~ A~ l;6

6. :)~UÙ ..

7. LV~1)'1 OCú-OOÙ ?;)1O ì L &4 ~/-\v'~e Äv(luvtj

8. iliL K'iL~ ~i-~~ 3?P lr ~o¡rH- /W~ ~ Ai fßú¡2

\?cgWe, the undersigned, are requesting that:

The proposed new Ordinance File' # 2010-0189 refer to and createconditions to enforce and uphold the Conditional Use Permit (A-71-0-81, April 30, 19'84) granted to Pacific Raceways.

This permit has not been enforced by King County up to this date:1. The required quiet days of Monday and Tuesday have not been observedor enforced (CUP condition 1.a)2. The required posting of i quiet weekend day each month, May throughSeptember has not been fulfiled to date (CUP condition b.2)3. The cessation of all noise by eleven PM has also not been fulfilled by PacRaceways.

B. That King County holds a full public hearing on the new proposedordinance and the Pacific Raceways petition for expanded trackfacilties and racing schedule (Pacific Raceways Proposed Ordinance2010-1089).

King County response to Pacific Raceways must include:1. All conditions required in the present Conditional Use Permit(A~7i-O~8i)2. All, if not updated, noise reduction requirements set forth in the PacificRaceway Track Relocation CUP (L08CU006).3. All, if not updated, environmental setbacks ?lnd noise barrier reductioncontained in both above permits and environmental protection for the LittleSoos l\t(

1. ~ArÕ-/h.AN 'rÚI ~\JIJ~-J 307/d--Il-irl-A'l- S'E. K"6.' wA~i:2. 'l H \ "\ ~ e. V"" ~) ~ ~o isçß?1. sc ~.e \ù C; 't0iZ-3.tø/E./tf- ~ ~4G i7!17Çftú/J~. tJ~~

4.tT ~Ac Sw~() 4 ~ lr~ IS At,,, elL-òlA e. Sf A0\.,n.~~5.--AJn/t~ 17. L~rçf)Ai ~d -~ ;3tP JI ~ /7/ Iftl~ s"ê /lrL.ltVa/~qL.

7. ?;l3lJ \ 7/:: Vt

.Jc~ c-AA,,¡ ~llt!,CÆlÆie u~¿

6.

8. .J ~-p\~2 \1 J~ A \J(" ~ i Aul~).;(rz\(1\ C\~

~c;We, the undersigned, are requesting that:


This permit has not been enforced by King County up to this date:1. The required quiet days of Monday and Tuesday have not been observedor enforced (CUP condition La)2. The required posting of 1 quiet weekend day each month, May throughSeptember has not been fulfiled to date (CUP condition b.2)3. The cessation of all noise by eleven PM has also not been fulfilled by PacRaceways.



1. z.¡ó.Ârin 'K 1J gl& ~i~ :J/8'/53cXS'..A C: /A¡lC¡?ô?'j

2.LII'CSEIj f:lLQr-!Z ~ /Ç702 ~F.C¡5TH kJAy ~/Al¡l3. ~ \ \' CV' , ' 21 'i I 5 S(: 2. S-tk ~. fY vJ 4'? 0 3-i4.S ~\ ~fSfìoG11 /),',5.i)~t(æv6'c//IY¿qt!LA~ '2.i¡ ~t? l ~~ t-C¡8à~¿

6. i;~kJJ Xl37J ~% k Yf ~ ~~ !7./~C~ \C1i'') ;)1315 3£ ~\- St. !h.~ V,,'~ tJA qB!,8. -l, f\ t,'\l (.~i; Y1?;î 1;1011 A \It: S IS £NIJ!\C L A \N, \/A q ßlfl1

'9

\ 0We, the undersigned, are requesting that:

The proposed new Ordinance File # 2010-0189 refer, to and createconditions to enforce and uphold the Conditional Use 'Permit (A-71-0-81, April 30, 1984) granted to Pacific Raceways.

-




1.

2. \ , i \ i J

3. ST:~e6Q.tLfV Ct Y'i- be.S eJ ,~

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

\ \

We, the undersigned, are requesting that:


This permit has not been enforced by King County up to this date:1. The required quiet days of Monday and Tuesday have not been observedor enforced (CUP condition La)2. The required posting of 1 quiet weekend day each month, May throughSeptember has not been fulfilled to date (CUP condition b.2)3. The cessation of all noise by eleven PM has also not been fulfiled by Pac

Raceways.


King County response to Pacific Raceways must include:1. All conditions required in the present Conditional Use Permit(A-71-0-81)2. All, if not updated, noise reduction requirements set forth in the PacificRaceway Track Relocation CUP (L08CU006).3. All, if not updated, environmental setbacks and noise barrier reductioncontained in both above permits and environmental protection for the LittleSoos Creek..

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

Documents

6.-( ~ ' o~ ~ S§ , 0 C', , ~,