SINCTA Sindicato dos Controladores de Tráfego Aéreo 1 Conferência Céu Único Europeu Política e Eficiência 24 de Outubro de 2014 Sobre o Sistema de Desempenho

SINCTA Sindicato dos Controladores de Tráfego Aéreo1

ConferênciaCéu Único Europeu Política e Eficiência24 de Outubro de 2014

Sobre o Sistema de Desempenho ATM:mitos e equívocosPedro BarataPresidente SINCTA


ConferênciaCéu Único Europeu Política e Eficiência

EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESS RELEASE Brussels, 11 June 2013

Inefficiencies in Europe's fragmented airspace bring extra costs of close to 5 billion Euros each year to airlines and their customers (…)

Fonte : Performance Review Report 2013 PRB

€ 2 880 M




On average, in Europe, aircraft fly 42 km longer than strictly necessary due to airspace fragmentation, causing longer flight time, delays, extra fuel burn and CO2 emissions

Separação táticaÁreas militaresMeteorologiaOptimização por vento

Optimização taxas





The KEA (…) reflects the actual environmental performance. In this case a distinction can be made between two separate components: “separation” and “fragmentation”.

Performance Review Report 2013 PRB

“Separation” relates to the need to safely manage the flow of traffic and has to be considered as a hard constraint. It is important to bear in mind that the level of inefficiencies cannot be reduced to zero.

Really?





It is recognised that KEA and KEP are proxies for fuel efficiency as the most fuelefficient route depends on wind.

Performance Review Report 2013 PRB

However, the wind optimal route might not necessarilycorrespond to the choice of the airspace users because they might use different measures, such as total cost (which would be dependent on the airspace users).

No way?

Moreover, the information needed to calculate these alternatives (wind optimal, total costs, etc.) is not currently available. The airspace users would have to either providedetailed information or agree on a standard method for the calculation of the route “values”.




The US air traffic management system is twice as efficient as that of the EU

Fonte : Euroncontrol Performance Review Comission 2013

390,95 430,70Pax Miles flown per year (in billion)

0,021 0,018ATM-Costs per Pax-Mile (€)

Fonte : FABEC December 2013

When the costs of ATM (PPP) are looked at in relation to passenger miles, the unit costs are 16% lower in Europe



Interdependências / Trade-offs

The PRB recognises that certain interdependencies between safety and other KPAs exist…

in PRB advice to the Comission in the setting of Union-wide performance targets for RP2 Set2013

There is some interdependency between en-route capacity and flight-efficiency…

There is some interdependency between flight-effciency and cost-efficiency…

a review of all FAB Performance Plans has revealed no evidence to suggest that the required performance in any KPA will be a limiting factor, preventing improvements, in any of the other KPAs. The PRB is therefore of the opinion that, at the moment, interdependencies cannot be used as a justification to pursue specific KPAs/KPIs at the expense of others.

in PRB Assessment Report of RP2 FAB Performance Plans Out2014



KPA Environment

Ninguém sabe porque são estes os valores referência, nem como se vão cumprir objectivos, mas…

All the FABs have adopted targets which correspond to the reference values.

It should be noted, though, that the Network Manager, which coordinates the pan-European approach to improving flight efficiency, highlighted in its latest ERNIPreport (June 2014) that most FABs’ contribution to the main projects included in theERNIP would not, on their own, be enough to meet the FAB targets.

Fonte: PRB Assessment Report of RP2 FAB Performance Plans



FABSW Performance Planas seen by PRB

Level of effectiveness of safety management

Severity classification

Just culture

Based on information provided in the Performance Plan, the PRB concludes thatthe local FAB target for reporting on the level of presence or absence of Just Culture has not been set (although the intention exists) and in addition, only limited information explaining the basic elements in place to promote the application of just culture is provided




Free Route Airspace Lisboa (FRAL) implementado em 2009Eficiência é total, relativamente aos factores internos NAV

Como é que foi determinado o valor referência? Qual o grau máximo de ganho de eficiência viável?Qual a quota-parte NAV neste valor referência e nos valores reais?




A Comissão avalia os planos de desempenho, os seus objetivos e, em particular, a sua compatibilidade com os objetivos de desempenho a nível da União e o seu contributo adequado para os mesmos, assim como com os critérios enunciados no anexo IV (Reg 390/2013)

Tendência dos Custos Unitários Determinados (DUC), Nível DUC, Custo de Capital, Previsão de Tráfego, Pressupostos Económicos, Custos Isentos, etc




2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 25.00

35.00

45.00

55.00

65.00

49.26

Ñ 32% over the period

33.57

63.71

Ñ 23% over the period

49.10

Lisboa DUC (low scenario) Union-wide DUC (low scenario)

EUR

2009

Lisboa versus Union-wide DUC (2009-2019)




RP1 + RP2 DUC Level (2009=Base100)

Not passed ???

When assessed over RP1 and RP2 (i.e. between 2011 and 2019), the DUC is planned to fall by -2.4% p.a., which is better than the expected decrease at Union-wide level (-1.7% p.a.).Key points for Portugal en-route charging zone

The assessment of the performance plans should also take into account the level of performance achieved in the previous reference period in the various key performance areas and in particular the cost-efficiency area

It should take into account local context, in particular the level of local unit rates or the circumstances of those States under the ‘European Support Mechanism’ Declaration of the Single Sky Committee following the adoption of Union-wide performance targets for the second reference period




RP1 + RP2 DUC Trend (2009=Base100)

Passed ???



Assessing the Performance Scheme andPRB assessment of Performance Plans…

Not PassedPoliticamente orientado

Clareza

Transparente para os stakeholders

Complexo/Imperceptível

Avaliação enviesada/distorcida

Critérios múltiplos e ad-hoc

Falta de equidade



Obrigado pela vossa atenção !

Documents

SINCTA Sindicato dos Controladores de Tráfego Aéreo 1 Conferência Céu Único Europeu Política e Eficiência 24 de Outubro de 2014 Sobre o Sistema de Desempenho