1
Properties of the transitional disks in five young stellar clusters K. H. Kim (U. Rochester), D. M. Watson (U. Rochester), P. Manoj (U. Rochester), W. J. Forrest (U. Rochester), E. Furlan (JPL), N. Calvet (U. Michigan), J. Najita (NOAO), M. K. McClure (U. Michigan), L. Hartmann (U. Michigan), L. E. Allen (CfA), J. Muzerolle (Steward), S. T. Megeath (Toledo), P. D’Alessio (UNAM), B. Sargent (STScI), J.D. Green (Texas) This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407. Support for this work was provided by NASA through Contract Number 1257184 issued by JPL/Caltech, and Cornell subcontracts 31419-5714 to the University of Rochester. Background Image : Artist Conception of transitional disks and pre-transitional disk (NASA/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle (SSC)) Introduction Sample size and transitional disk frequency Transitional Disk Structure and Properties Are transitional disks older than full disks? Summary & Preliminary Results region ONC L1641 Tau Cha I Oph ClassII+III 127 114 85 71 71 TD+WTD +PTD 20 24 5 8 4 TD 8 19 2 4 1 WTD 5 3 1 2 1 PTD 7 2 2 2 2 median age < 0.8 Myr ~1 Myr ~1.5 Myr ~2 Myr ~ 2.1 Myr Distance (pc) 400-500 400-500 140 160 120-160 Table 1. Summary of some properties of each region and number of sample. Fig 6. HR diagram for transitional disks. Evolutionary tracks and isochrones are from Siess et al. Isochrone ages of various types of transitional disks range from < 1 Myr to > 5 Myr. The average disk life time in Tau-Aur (Bertout et al. 2007) is also shown as brown dash-dotted line for reference.. The spectral index (n λ1-λ2 ) measure of the slope of the SEDs between two wavelengths, λ 1 and λ 2 . ) log( ) log( ) log( ) log( 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 F F n m m con con d F F F m EW 13 8 . . ) 10 ( The equivalent width of the 10 μm silicate emission feature (EW(10μm)) is a measure of the amount of optically thin dust per unit area of optically thick disk . n 13-31 vs. n K-6 is a good method to separate transitional disks from the optically thick full disks. n K-6 is a good indicator for distinguishing TD from PTD (See Fig 2).In their spectra, transitional disks show different disk structures which cannot be explained by standard full disk models (d’Alessio et al. 2006). See Fig 3 and Fig 4 . The frequency of transitional disks identified from the IRS spectra in the five star forming regions studied here range from 6% to 21%. The fraction of transitional disks in each region, and that in each type of transitional disks, are not strongly correlated with the median isochronal age of each stellar cluster (See Table 1 and Fig 5). TDs are seen dominantly among later type and younger stars, and PTDs seem to be seen more among early type and older stars. (See Fig 6 and Fig7). Also R wall of PTD tends to be larger than that of TD (See Fig 7). This is consistent with the gravitational effects of sub-stellar companions, like giant planets, being responsible for the gaps in the disks. The significant correlation found between R wall and M star (L star ) is consistent with the well known dependence between binary separation and system stellar mass. The correlations found for L x and dM/dt with R wall are not as strong as those seen for of M star and L star . More L x and dM/dt data needed to explore potential trends. Fig 1. SEDs of various kind of transitional disks. Blue dotted line represent Class II median of that region and Red line represent the IRS spectrum Fig 4. EW(10 μm) vs. n 13-31. There are several outliers which cannot be accounted for by the accretion disk models (e.g. D’Alessio et al. 2006). Fig 3. n 13-31 vs. n 6-13 : Settled disks lie in the direction of the arrow; Transitional disks are well separated from the main distribution of Class II YSOs. Settled disk Fig 2. n 13-31 vs. n K-6 . Transitional disks are well separated from the ordinary Class II and Class III objects. Most transitional disks are located in the upper left area (above median of n 13-31 and below median of n K-6 ). Dotted line : medians; Dashed line : n 13-31 of full disk; gray area : transition area between TD and PTD. Fig 8. Trends among transitional disk properties. (L x data of Tau, Cha I, and Oph region are taken from WGACAT (White et al. 2000) (circles). ; L x data of ONC region are from Chandra (triangle).) Fig 7. (Left): Spectral Type distribution among transitional disks. Most TDs are late-type stars and most PTD are early-type stars.; (Right): R wall distribution among transitional disks. PTDs tend to have larger R wall . Large fraction of TDs have R wall < 20 AU. TD WTD PTD TD WTD PTD Fig 5. Transitional disk fraction vs. median cluster age. Transitional disk fraction of each region is a fraction from the sample of Class II+III. Trends of Transitional Disks r = 0.74 P = 1.4×10 -9 % N = 60 0.1 1.0 10.0 1 10 100 1000 Mass of star (M sun ) R wall (AU) Tau (5) Cha I (8) Oph (4) L1641 (23) ONC (20) r = 0.87 P = 1.8×10 -17 % N = 60 0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 1 10 100 1000 Lstar (Lsun) R wall (AU) Tau (5) Cha I (8) Oph (4) L1641 (23) ONC (20) r = 0.54 P = 1.7% N = 19 28.5 29.0 29.5 30.0 30.5 31.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 log(Lx) (erg/s) log(R wall )(AU) Tau (2) Cha I (7) Oph (2) ONC(8) r = 0.62 P = 2.4% N = 13 -11.0 -10.0 -9.0 -8.0 -7.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 log(dM/dt) (Msun/yr) log(R wall )(AU) Tau (5) Cha I (6) L1641 (3) Transitional disks are protoplanetary disks that have inner clearings or radial gaps on AU scales. They are thought to represent an evolutionary stage in between that of Class II objects and Class III objects. The SEDs of these disks exhibit a significant deficit of flux in the near-infrared (at < 10 μm) wavelengths relative to those of the optically thick, radially-continuous disks, and a steeply rising excess at the mid- and far-infrared wavelengths. With Spitzer-IRS spectra it is possible to identify transitional disks and characterize the structure and contents of the gaps/holes, in very large samples of objects within nearby associations. SpT distribution of our sample of transitional disks among five star-forming regions: G-M Transitional disks may be classified in three categories by their disk structure. TD: Transitional disks with an inner hole (central clearing). (or CTD as canonical transitional disk (Muzerolle et al. 2008)); WTD: Transitional disks with weak excess at < 10 μm, indicating an optically thin inner disk separated by a gap from the optically thick outer disk.; PTD: Pre-Transitional disk (Espaillat et al. 2007, 2008), showing excess similar to the median at < 5 μm, indicating an optically thick inner disk separated by a gap from the optically thick outer disk. 10 20 30 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >G2 G8 K1 K3 K5 K7 M1 M3 M5 N Spectral Type TD (27) WTD (12) PTD (9) known SpT only known SpT only 0 10 20 30 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Transitional disk fraction (%) Median Age (Myr) TD+WTD+PTD TD+WTD

(AU) log(R )(AU) Michigan), L. E. Allen (CfA), J

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: (AU) log(R )(AU) Michigan), L. E. Allen (CfA), J

Properties of the transitional disksin five young stellar clusters

K. H. Kim (U. Rochester), D. M. Watson (U. Rochester), P. Manoj (U. Rochester), W. J. Forrest (U. Rochester), E. Furlan (JPL), N. Calvet (U. Michigan), J. Najita (NOAO), M. K. McClure (U. Michigan), L. Hartmann (U. Michigan), L. E. Allen (CfA), J. Muzerolle (Steward), S. T. Megeath (Toledo), P. D’Alessio (UNAM), B. Sargent (STScI), J.D. Green (Texas)

This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407. Support for this work was provided by NASA through Contract Number 1257184 issued by JPL/Caltech, and Cornell subcontracts 31419-5714 to the University of Rochester.

Background Image : Artist Conception of transitional disks and pre-transitional disk (NASA/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle (SSC))

Introduction

Sample size and transitional disk frequency

Transitional Disk Structure and Properties

Are transitional disks older than full disks?

Summary & Preliminary Results

region ONC L1641 Tau Cha I Oph

ClassII+III 127 114 85 71 71

TD+WTD

+PTD20 24 5 8 4

TD 8 19 2 4 1

WTD 5 3 1 2 1

PTD 7 2 2 2 2

median

age< 0.8 Myr ~1 Myr ~1.5 Myr ~2 Myr ~ 2.1 Myr

Distance

(pc)400-500 400-500 140 160 120-160

Table 1. Summary of some properties of each region and number of sample.

Fig 6. HR diagram for transitional disks. Evolutionary tracks and isochrones are from Siess et al. (2000) (Z=0.02). Isochrone ages of various types of transitional disks range from < 1 Myr to > 5 Myr. The average disk life time in Tau-Aur(Bertout et al. 2007) is also shown as brown dash-dotted line for reference..

The spectral index (nλ1-λ2)measure of the slope of the SEDs between two wavelengths, λ1 and λ2 .

)log()log(

)log()log(

12

12 12

21

FFn

m

mcon

con dF

FFmEW

13

8.

.)10(

The equivalent width of the 10 μm silicate emission feature (EW(10μm)) is a measure of the amount of optically thin dust per unit area of optically thick disk .

n13-31 vs. nK-6 is a good method to separate transitional disks from the optically thick full disks. nK-6 is a good indicator for distinguishing TD from PTD (See Fig 2).In their spectra, transitional disks show different disk structures which cannot be explained by standard full disk models (d’Alessio et al. 2006). See Fig 3 and Fig 4 .

The frequency of transitional disks identified from the IRS spectra in the five star forming regions studied here range from 6% to 21%. The fraction of transitional disks in each region, and that in each type of transitional disks, are not strongly correlated with the median isochronal age of each stellar cluster (See Table 1 and Fig 5).

TDs are seen dominantly among later type and younger stars, and PTDs seem to be seen more among early type and older stars. (See Fig 6 and Fig7). Also Rwall of PTD tends to be larger than that of TD (See Fig 7). This is consistent with the gravitational effects of sub-stellar companions, like giant planets, being responsible for the gaps in the disks.

The significant correlation found between Rwall and Mstar (Lstar) is consistent with the well known dependence between binary separation and system stellar mass. The correlations found for Lx and dM/dt with Rwall are not as strong as those seen for of Mstar and Lstar. More Lx and dM/dt data needed to explore potential trends.

Fig 1. SEDs of various kind of transitional disks. Blue dotted line represent Class II median of that region and Red line represent the IRS spectrum

Fig 4. EW(10 μm) vs. n13-31. There are several outliers which cannot be accounted for by the accretion disk models (e.g. D’Alessio et al. 2006).

Fig 3. n13-31 vs. n6-13: Settled disks lie in the direction of the arrow; Transitional disks are well separated from the main distribution of Class II YSOs.

Settled disk

Fig 2. n13-31 vs. nK-6. Transitional disks are well separated from the ordinary Class II and Class III objects. Most transitional disks are located in the upper left area (above median of n13-31 and below median of nK-6). Dotted line : medians; Dashed line : n13-31 of full disk; gray area : transition area between TD and PTD.

Fig 8. Trends among transitional disk properties. (Lx data of Tau, Cha I, and Oph region are taken from WGACAT (White et al. 2000) (circles). ; Lx data of ONC region are from Chandra (triangle).)

Fig 7. (Left): Spectral Type distribution among transitional disks. Most TDs are late-type stars and most PTD are early-type stars.; (Right): Rwall distribution among transitional disks. PTDs tend to have larger Rwall. Large fraction of TDs have Rwall < 20 AU.

TD WTD PTD

TD WTD PTD

Fig 5. Transitional disk fraction vs. median cluster age. Transitional disk fraction of each region is a fraction from the sample of Class II+III.

Trends of Transitional Disks

r = 0.74

P = 1.4×10-9%

N = 60

0.1

1.0

10.0

1 10 100 1000

Ma

ss o

f st

ar

(Msu

n)

Rwall (AU)

Tau (5)

Cha I (8)

Oph (4)

L1641 (23)

ONC (20)

r = 0.87

P = 1.8×10-17%

N = 60

0.0

0.1

1.0

10.0

100.0

1 10 100 1000

Lst

ar

(Lsu

n)

Rwall (AU)

Tau (5)Cha I (8)Oph (4)L1641 (23)ONC (20)

r = 0.54

P = 1.7%

N = 19

28.5

29.0

29.5

30.0

30.5

31.0

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

log

(Lx)

(erg

/s)

log(Rwall )(AU)

Tau (2)

Cha I (7)

Oph (2)

ONC(8)

r = 0.62

P = 2.4%

N = 13

-11.0

-10.0

-9.0

-8.0

-7.0

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

log

(dM

/dt)

(Msu

n/y

r)

log(Rwall )(AU)

Tau (5)

Cha I (6)

L1641 (3)

•Transitional disks are protoplanetary disks that have inner clearings or radial gaps on AU scales. They are thought to represent an evolutionary stage in between that of Class II objects and Class III objects. The SEDs of these disks exhibit a significant deficit of flux in the near-infrared (at < 10 μm) wavelengths relative to those of the optically thick, radially-continuous disks, and a steeply rising excess at the mid- and far-infrared wavelengths.• With Spitzer-IRS spectra it is possible to identify transitional disks and characterize the structure and contents of the gaps/holes, in very large samples of objects within nearby associations. • SpT distribution of our sample of transitional disks among five star-forming regions: G-M• Transitional disks may be classified in three categories by their disk structure. TD: Transitional disks with an inner hole (central clearing). (or CTD as canonical transitional disk (Muzerolle et al. 2008)); WTD: Transitional disks with weak excess at < 10 μm, indicating an optically thin inner disk separated by a gap from the optically thick outer disk.; PTD: Pre-Transitional disk (Espaillat et al. 2007, 2008), showing excess similar to the median at < 5 μm, indicating an optically thick inner disk separated by a gap from the optically thick outer disk.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

10203040506070>80

N

Rwall (AU)

TD (27)WTD (12)PTD (9)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

>G2 G8 K1 K3 K5 K7 M1 M3 M5

N

Spectral Type

TD (27)WTD (12)PTD (9)

known SpT only known SpT only

0

10

20

30

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

Tra

ns

itio

na

l dis

k f

rac

tio

n (

%)

Median Age (Myr)

TD+WTD+PTD

TD+WTD