8
Effect of increased body mass index and anaesthetic duration on recovery of protective airway reexes after sevourane vs desurane R. E. McKay 1 * , A. Malhotra 1 , O. S. Cakmakkaya 1 2 , K. T. Hall 1 , W. R. McKay 1 and C. C. Apfel 1 1  Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care, C-450, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0648, USA. 2 Cerrahpasa Medical School, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Background. Increased BMI may increase the body’s capacity to store potent inhaled anaes- thetics, more so with more soluble agents. Accordingly, we asked whether increased BMI and longer anaesthesia prolonged airway reex recovery. Methods. W e me asur ed time fr om anaes the tic disc ont inuat ion unt il rs t re spo nse to command (T1); from response to command until ability to swallow (T2); and from anaesthetic discontinuation to recovery of ability to swallow (T3) in 120 patients within three BMI ranges (18–24, 25–29, and !30 kg m 22 ). All rec eive d sev ourane or desurane, deliv ere d via an LMA. Results. T1 and T3 after sevourane exceeded T1 and T3 after desurane: 6.6 ( SD 4.2) vs 4.0 (1.9) min (P ,0.001), and 14.1 ( SD 8.3) vs 6.1 (2.0) min ( P ,0.0001). T3 correlated more strongly wi th BMI af te r sevourane (28 s pe r kg m 22 , P ¼0. 02) than desur ane (7 s per kg m 22 , P ¼0.03). Regarding T2, patients receiving sevourane with BMI !30 kg m 22 were less often able to swallow 2 min after response to command than were those with BMI 18–24 or 25–29 kg m 22 (3/20 vs 10/20 or 9/20, P ,0.05). Each sevourane MAC-hour delayed T3 by 4.5 min (268 s) (R¼0.46, P ,0.001) whereas each desurane MAC-hour delayed T3 by 0.2 min (16 s) (R¼0.10, P ¼0.44). Conclusions. Prolonged sevourane administration and greater BMI delay airway reex recov- ery . The contr ibut ion of BMI to thi s del a y is more pr ono unc ed af te r sev ou rane tha n desurane. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 175–82 Keywords: airway, reexes; anaesthetics, desurane; anaesthetics, sevourane; anaesthetics, volatile; pharmacokinetics, obesity; pharmacokinetics, uptake Accepted for publication: November 27, 2009 Volunteers 1 and patients 2 4 awaken more rapidly after des- ura ne than sev ourane anaest he si a, in part at le ast because of the lesser solubility of desurane. Does a more rapid awa keni ng tran slate into grea ter pati ent safet y, par- ti cula rl y into a fa st er re cove ry of pr ot ecti ve ai rway reexes? At 25% of MACawake, sevo ura ne, isou rane , and propo fol signicantly dec re ase the coordi na tion of pharyngeal muscles, 5 and patients anaesthetized with des- urane recover protective airway reexes faster than those anaesthetized with sevourane. 6 Interi m ndings from thi s tri al were pr ese nted as a pos ter at the 2008 Eur ope an Soc iet y of Anae st hes ia in Copenhage n, Denmar k. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2008; 25 (Suppl 44): 2AP2–7.  Declaration of interest. R.E.M. has received research support in the past from Baxter Healthcar e for other studies, but did not rece ive support for this study. She has also received honoraria for speaking fr om Baxter Hea lth car e. Baxter manufa ctures sev our ane and desurane. R.E.M. is a member of the Speakers Bureau for Baxter Healthcare, manufacturer of sevourane and desurane. In addition, Baxter Healthcare has provided research support to the University of California for some of R.E.M.’s investigator-initiated projects in the past. # The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected]  British Journal of Anaesthesia 104 (2): 175–82 (2010) doi:10.1093 /bja/aep374 Advance Ac cess public ation December 26 , 2009   b  y  g  u  e  s  t   o F  e  b r  u  a r  y  5  , 2  0 1 2 h  t   t   p  :  /   /   b  j   a  .  o x f   o r  d  j   o  u r n  a l   s  .  o r  g  /  D  o  w n l   o  a  d  e  d f  r  o m  

Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

8/2/2019 Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/br-j-anaesth-2010-mckay-175-82 1/8

Page 2: Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

8/2/2019 Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/br-j-anaesth-2010-mckay-175-82 2/8

Page 3: Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

8/2/2019 Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/br-j-anaesth-2010-mckay-175-82 3/8

Page 4: Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

8/2/2019 Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/br-j-anaesth-2010-mckay-175-82 4/8

Page 5: Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

8/2/2019 Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/br-j-anaesth-2010-mckay-175-82 5/8

Page 6: Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

8/2/2019 Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/br-j-anaesth-2010-mckay-175-82 6/8

Page 7: Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

8/2/2019 Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/br-j-anaesth-2010-mckay-175-82 7/8

Page 8: Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

8/2/2019 Br. J. Anaesth.-2010-McKay-175-82

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/br-j-anaesth-2010-mckay-175-82 8/8