Upload
phamduong
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
5º EBBC
Dante Cid – Vice-Presidente de Relações Acadêmicas
Julho 2016
Fontes de informação e seu papel no provimento de dados a pesquisadores especialistas em estudos Cientométricos
| 3
Uma cesta de métricas para apoiar a Cientometria
Usage Citations Audience Patents
Scholarly Activity Academic Opinion
Social Activity Media Activity
Outputs Funding awards
Editor Board
Authors
Community Contributions Consumption Scholarly Impact Social Impact
Type of metrics
Geographical spread
Collaboration network
Sector distribution
h-, g-, m- indices
Scholarly Output
Research data output
Conference output
Citation counts
Usage counts
SNIP, SJR, IF
Audience
Scholarly Discussion
Peer review metrics
Prizes and awards
Social media mentions
Media mentions
Medical guidelines
Influence policies
Mendeley Counts
Individual metrics
Funding sources
Patent metrics
Entities Articles Custom document set
Journals, Conferences,
Books Portfolio
Author, Editor,
Reviewer
Institution or group
Subject area
| 4
A Evolução das métricas e ferramentas baseadas nos dados do Scopus
2016 – Journal metrics module 2015 – Article-level metrics module 2014 – SciVal launches 2013 – Increased Export limits 2012 – Modified SNIP & SJR, Altmetric, Analyze results 2011 – Export refine 2010 – SNIP & SJR Journal Metrics 2009 – Author Evaluator 2008 – Journal Analyzer 2007 – h-index graph 2006 – Citation Overview (Citation Tracker) 2004 – Scopus launches
| 5
Os dados do Scopus são a base para uma série de soluções
SCOPUS DATA
Scopus.com SciVal.com
- Analytical Services - APIs - Scopus Custom Data
Mendeley
Pure …
METRICS
RESEARCH OUTCOMES
*Analytical Services refers to the use of Scopus Custom data (and other data) in reports, assessment exercises, rankings and other Custom Data commercial projects.
| 6
JOURNALS
21,568 peer-reviewed journals 361 trade journals Full metadata, abstracts and cited references (ref’s post-1995 only)
Physical Sciences 7,443 Health Sciences 6,795 Social Sciences 8,086 Life Sciences 4,492
90K conference events 7.3M conference papers Mainly Engineering and Computer Sciences
531 book series 30K Volumes / 1.2M items 119,882 stand-alone books 974K items
Focus on Social Sciences and A&H
62M records from 22K serials, 90K conferences and 120K books
• Updated daily • “Articles in Press” from > 3,750 titles • 40 different languages covered • 3,715 active Gold Open Access journals indexed
BOOKS CONFERENCES
Source: November 2015 title list at https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/content
Scopus includes content from more than 5,000 publishers and 105 different countries
| 7
More than 3,500 organizations, including over 150 leading funding, assessment and ranking bodies rely on Scopus data
MD Anderson
Keio University
Kiel University
Gazi University
Queen’s University Belfast
Ural Federal University
Nanyang Technological University
UK BIS
ERA 2014
UK REF
Nigerian Government
ISTIC Peking University
NRF -Korea
FCT Portugal
Danish BFI
Germany IFQ
Italy ANVUR
IISER
STINT Michigan Corporate Relations Network
ReachNC
Russian Foundation of Basic Research
TCI - Thailand
NSF
European Commission & ERC
NCN Poland Estonia Research Council
| 8
National research assessment and benchmarking reports • UK REF, UK BIS reports • ERA (Australia) • FCT (Portugal) • VQR (Italy)
Elsevier is increasingly the partner of choice for global research leaders
Global University Rankings • Times Higher World University Rankings • QS rankings • US News rankings (Arab Region) • China University Rankings
Initiatives and reports (select examples) • UK Royal Society • Science Europe • European Commission, FENS, HBP, Kavli
Foundation, RIKEN BSI • World Bank • EuroStemCell, Kyoto University • Urban Innovation Network • The Council of State Governments • Snowball Metrics • British Council
| 9
Scopus data is also involved in a number of key reports on mobility, gender and international collaboration
| 10
https://www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence/case-studies
Learn how your peers are using Research Intelligence tools
| 22
Acesso a grandes volumes de dados: Portal para Mineração de Dados e Texto
2006 Started supporting ad-hoc TDM access requests
• Low - but increasing level - of interest from early adopters
2012 First content mining policy published • Developed new APIs & rolled out better TDM technical
solutions
2013 Pilot (~30 academics) • Discover two main user cases for TDM and input to refine our
TDM technical solutions
2014 Publish updated TDM policy • Automatically give access to subscribed users • Launch a developers portal to facilitate access
2015 Launch STM Open Access Corpus • Valuable open access tool to help researchers refine and
develop their tools in order to TDM more effectively
| 24
Addressing two issues:
1. Problem: Researchers want to be able to access full text content from multiple publishers’ sites for OA or subscribed content in a consistent way. Solution: Common API (protocol) for requesting machine readable full text from many different publishers
Supporting cross-publisher TDM
http://www.crossref.org/tdm/index.html
2. Problem: Researchers want to know whether text and data mining is allowed, and if not, get permission. Solution: Licensing information embedded in article metadata and a registry for supplemental text and data mining terms and conditions (licenses).
| 27
“A ‘basket of metrics’—the best support for understanding journal merit” by L. Colledge, 2015, European Science Editing (41(3)), 61. Copyright 2015 by the European Association of Science Editors • http://www.ease.org.uk/sites/default/files/origarticle_1.pdf
Referencias