8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
1/49
P REINFORCED EARTH COMPAN
B:
A A, P.E. & E N, P.E.
N G L.
O 20, 2010
Lateral Displacement.
Contour lines
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
2/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
1
N FLAC R E
P M B / G . T
12 MSE
. T MSE
.
M T D MSE W
T MSE . T 200, 400 750 475, 975
2475 , .
T MSE
. T
MSE 100, 200 400 475, 975 2475 , .
M I D MSE W
T
( ) MSE .
T MSE 50, 100
200 475, 975 2475 , . T
MSE 50, 150 300 475, 975 2475
, .
R R S
O , 6, 6 8 475, 975
2475 , . T 0.7, 1.5 2.8%
475, 975 2475 , . T
15% MSE .
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
3/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
2
1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3
2 Available Information .......................................................................................................... 3
3 FLAC Numerical Modeling .................................................................................................. 4
3.1 Soil Profile and Properties Used in the FLAC Model ................................................... 4 3.2 Model Geometry ......................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Input Ground Motion ................................................................................................... 5 3.4 Constitutive Models .................................................................................................... 5
3.4.1 UBCSAND ...................................................................................................... 5 3.4.2 UBCHYST ....................................................................................................... 5
3.5 General Procedure for Numerical Analysis ................................................................. 6
4 FLAC analyses results and discussions ............................................................................. 6
5 Limitations and Uncertainties ............................................................................................. 9
A:
T 1 10
F 1 19
A A S SHAKE A
A B UBCSAND C M
A C UBCHST C M
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
4/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
3
1 DC
N G L (NGL) R E C (RECO)
MSE
PMH1 . T MSE
.
T 12 MSE
.
2 AAABE FA
T RECO NGL :
G MSE : F 1 MSE
. S 9 .
R : T 1 2
, .
F : T 3 .
B : G MSE
(MSE ) MSE () T 4.
S , G
( NGL) (S T 4 F 2)
.
D
T
475, 975, 2475
(G A M J 24, 2007).
E 6 .
E :
T = 16 P MSE
S
S
MEG C L. T 5.
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
5/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
4
I (V )
20
21 MSE (F 3).
3 FAC ECA DE
D
FLAC, V 6 (ITASCA 2008).
3.1 FAC
T 12 (MSE )
54 . NBCC
2005 S
360/ 760/. T
: 2.9 (F), 3 / (SM/ML), 1.5
(SG), 26.5 (SP1 SP4), 15 (CLML) 5
(CLGC). W 2.5 . T 6
F 4 FLAC .
I
. E SM/ML
30% (S T 6 ).I MSE
.
3.2
T FLAC 875 54 66 . I 0.375 0.4
(F 5) MSE . E
MSE . T MSE
.
16 9 FLAC 8 FLAC . O
. B .
T . T MSE
23
(F 6).
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
6/49
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
7/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
6
(G) (G)
(η)
. UBCHST
G/G . A C UBCHST
.
3.5 A
I FLAC,
. T :
• S
E .
• S MC
.
• S , 1.5
E .
• S MC
.
• R
.
• S UBCHST UBCSAND
.
• T 1% R
.
• S ,
FLAC , .
• C .
4 FAC AAE E AD DC
FLAC 18 . T 7 10
.
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
8/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
7
F , MSE CHICHI
NS2475 . CHICHINS2475
.
P
F 8B , R=∆/σ
50 . T
R MSE . O
, R MSE
. F 9T
SP1.
T D
F 9, 10 11 ,
, .
T MSE
(P B F 12). T
200, 400 750 475, 975 2475 , .
T
MSE (P E F 12). T
MSE 100, 200
400 475, 975 2475 ,
T 7 (F 12)
FLAC .
F 13 FLAC
, MSE MSE . T
MSE
.
I D E D MSE W
PMH1 .
T MSE FLAC
F 14. I MSE
. F,
MSE .
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
9/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
8
R MSE
MSE
(F 15). T
. R MSE
. T
MSE
. T 8 (
).
T
FLAC
T 9.T
MSE 50, 100 200 475, 975 2475 ,
. T MSE 50, 150 300 475, 975 2475 ,
.
F 16 ,
. N .
R R S E S
F 17 T 10
. F 18
. A MSE . S
. F R #2 88
N/ (88N/ =2 / 44 N/) 5 . O
, 6, 6 8
475, 975 2475 , .
F 19 . S
. T 0.7, 1.5
2.8% 475, 975 2475 , (T 10). T
15% MSE .
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
10/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
9
5 A AD CEAE
N .
H,
, . T
.
T
(
100 ).
P .
T,
A A, P.E. E N, P.E
G E S G E
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
11/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
10
T
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
12/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
11
T 1 D 3 MSE
# H .
F 3
()
16 11.625 4
15 10.875 4
14 10.125 4
13 9.375 4
12 8.625 4
11 7.875 4
10 7.125 4
9 6.375 4
8 5.625 4
7 4.875 4
6 4.125 4
5 3.375 5
4 2.625 5
3 1.875 5
2 1.125 6
1 0.375 6
T 2 P
N:
G . C (
100 )
(44 N/).
M E (MP) 2.1 x 105
P () 0.3
G C (2) 50 4 = 200
C (2)
50 2 = 100
( N)
(MP) 440
R () 20%
A () 15%
I () 2
M () 0.67
T (P) 120
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
13/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
12
T 3 P
G (2/) 0.14
' , E (MP) 2.5 x 104
M , I (4/L) 2.30 x 10-4
M (2/L) ( N) 0.001
D (/3) ( N) 2500
N:
B RECO,
.
A 350,000 /3
.
T 4 G MSE
S P MSE F B
U (N/3) 20 21
P F () 34 36
D () 4 0
C 0 0
P () 0.3 0.3
S , G (MP) 22.6 22.6
S , VS N 1 N 1
C UBCHST UBCHST
UBCHST , R, 0.8, 2.5 0.8, 2.5
N 1: S C . (1997) :
W A=295, B=143 =0.26 F R S. 0.68
80% .
S : ρ
( ) ( ) 125.0'
o
n
a
vs K
Pe B AV ⋅
⋅⋅−=
σ
2max sV G ρ =
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
14/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
13
T 5 G ,
MEG C L.
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
15/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
14
T 6 S S
F L A C M
N
S
T
B
G
P
φ P
S
N 1 6 0
G
P
D
U B C S A N D
U W M
.
.
F .
( )
( )
( )
(
)
( N / 3 )
( M )
( M )
( )
( )
( P )
B / 0 . 3
( )
( )
( / 3 )
R
N ( 4 )
N ( 5 )
N ( 6 )
N ( 9 )
N ( 8 )
1 5 . 9
3 . 9
1 2
0
M S E
2 . 5
0 . 8
1 9 . 5
3 . 9
1 2
0
B
2 . 5
0 . 8
3 . 9
1
0
2 . 9
F I L L
1 8 . 5
7 3
3 4
0 . 3
3 2
2 . 6
8
0 . 4
7
1 8 8 8
4
0 . 8
1
2
2 . 9
5 . 9
S M / M L
1 6 . 7
2 6 1
5 6
0 . 4
0
N ( 6 )
2 . 6
8
0 . 5
8
1 1 2 3
1 . 5
0 . 8
2
3 . 5
5 . 9
7 . 4
S G
1 9
1 6 9
7 8
0 . 3
3 5
3 0
2 . 6
8
0 . 4
4
1 4 9 8
N ( 8 )
3 . 5
1 0
7 . 4
1 3 . 9
S P 1
1 8 . 6
1 9 3
8 9
0 . 3
3 3
1 5
2 . 6
8
0 . 4
7
1 4 3 2
N ( 8 )
1 0
1 5
1 3 . 9
1 8 . 9
S P 2
1 8 . 6
2 2 8
1 0 5
0 . 3
3 3
1 7
2 . 6
8
0 . 4
7
1 4 3 2
N ( 8 )
1 5
2 0
1 8 . 9
2 3 . 9
S P 3
1 8 . 6
2 6 1
1 2 0
0 . 3
3 3
1 7
2 . 6
8
0 . 4
7
1 4 3 2
N ( 8 )
2 0
3 0
2 3 . 9
3 3 . 9
S P 4
1 9
3 3 1
1 5 3
0 . 3
3 5
2 5
2 . 6
8
0 . 4
4
1 4 9 8
N ( 8 )
3 0
3 9
3 3 . 9
4 2 . 9
C L M L 1
1 8
1 5 9 6
1 6 5
0 . 4
5
0
8 5
2 . 7
0 . 5
1
1 3 2 9
1
0 . 8
3 9
4 5
4 2 . 9
4 8 . 9
C L M L 2
1 8
1 2 9 3
1 3 4
0 . 4
5
0
8 5
2 . 7
0 . 5
1
1 3 2 9
1
0 . 8
4 5
5 0
4 8 . 9
5 3 . 9
C L G C
2 0
1 4 3 7
1 4 9
0 . 4
5
0
1 4 0
2 . 7
0 . 3
9
1 6 5 3
1 . 5
0 . 8
T I L L
2 2
3 . 9
1 7
0
2 0 . 9
D . S P S G
2 0
0 . 3
3 8
0
3 0
1 5 0 0
2
0 . 8
1
2
2 . 9
5 . 9
S M / M L +
0 . 4
0
N ( 6 )
1 . 5
0 . 8
C M
A
/ C
N
( 2 )
S P
N ( 7 )
N ( 1 )
N ( 3 )
S S T
D
> 5 3 . 9
E
< 5 0
N ( 1 0 )
B
U B C H S T
N ( 4 )
.
F .
N
( 4 )
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
16/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
15
T 6 C
N :
( 1 )
I
M E G C
( 2 )
A
N G L
( 3 )
D
.
N .
( 4 )
S
T T
.
G .
F S M / M L ,
G S .
F
G
.
( 5 )
P
.
F U B C S A N D ,
N 1 6 0
/ 1 0
( 6 )
U
F S M / M L
,
5 0 P 0 . 3
5 σ
S .
F S M / M L
,
5 0 P 0 . 3
5 S
φ = 4 5 .
( 7 )
S A 1
( 8 )
T U B C S A N D .
1 = 4 . 7
S G
F
2 = 1
3 = 4
4 = 1
( 9 )
S P T
,
.
( 1 0 ) F
5 4
.
A N B C
C 2 0 0 5 ,
3 6 0 / 7 6 0 / .
F :
= 4 0 0 /
0 . 4
0 . 5
0 . 6
0 . 7
0 . 8
0 . 9 1
1 . 1
1 . 2 0
. E + 0 0
1 . E
+ 0 5
2 . E
+ 0 5
3 . E
+ 0 5
4 . E
+ 0 5
5 . E
+ 0 5 6
. E + 0 5
7 . E
+ 0 5
8 . E
+ 0 5
1 ( )
σ σσ σ ( / 2 )
B C A D
1
N 1 6 0 = 1 5
N 1 6 0 = 1 7
N 1 6 0 = 2 5
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
17/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
16
T 7 T D
F L A C S F
1 2
F L A C
D
A
F
X ( )
( )
X ( )
( )
X ( )
( )
X ( )
( )
X ( )
( )
X ( )
( )
X ( )
( )
X ( )
( )
X ( )
( )
X ( )
( )
X ( )
( )
3 1 5
C H C H E
2 4 7 5
5 3 0
2 0 0
8 8 0
2 0 0
8 8 0
1 2 0
8 5 0
1 2 0
7 2 0
4 5 0
7 0 0
4 2 0
6 3 0
3 6 0
5 3 0
2 7 0
3 9 0
1 4 0
3 7 0
1 2 0
3 6 0
1 1 0
3 1 4
C H C H
2 4 7 5
6 0 0
2 5 0
1 0 8 0
2 6 0
1 0 8 0
1 5 0
1 0 3 0
1 2 0
8 4 0
6 6 0
8 0 0
6 1 0
7 1 0
5 4 0
5 7 0
4 2 0
3 6 0
2 4 0
3 3 0
2 1 0
3 2 0
1 9 0
3 1 9
E
2 4 7 5
3 3 0
1 2 0
5 2 0
1 2 0
5 2 0
7 0
5 0 0
6 0
4 3 0
2 6 0
4 2 0
2 4 0
3 9 0
2 0 0
3 3 0
1 5 0
2 7 0
9 0
2 6 0
8 0
2 5 0
8 0
3 1 8
2 4 7 5
6 3 0
2 6 0
1 0 6 0
2 8 0
1 0 6 0
1 7 0
1 0 2 0
1 3 2
8 7 0
5 6 0
8 3 0
5 2 0
7 5 0
4 4 0
6 5 0
3 4 0
4 5 0
1 6 0
4 1 0
1 2 0
4 0 0
1 1 0
3 1 7
E
2 4 7 5
2 8 0
1 1 0
4 6 0
1 1 0
4 6 0
7 0
4 4 0
6 0
3 8 0
2 5 0
3 8 0
2 3 0
3 4 0
1 9 0
2 8 0
1 4 0
2 2 0
8 0
2 1 0
7 0
2 0 0
7 0
3 1 6
2 4 7 5
3 1 0
9 0
4 6 0
9 0
4 6 0
6 0
4 5 0
5 0
3 9 0
2 0 0
3 9 0
1 9 0
3 6 0
1 6 0
3 0 0
1 1 0
2 6 0
7 0
2 5 0
6 0
2 5 0
6 0
4 4 7
1 7 2
7 4 3
1 7 7
7 4 3
1 0 7
7 1 5
9 0
6 0 5
3 9 7
5 8 7
3 6 8
5 3 0
3 1 5
4 4 3
2 3 8
3 2 5
1 3 0
3 0 5
1 1 0
2 9 7
1 0 3
3 1 3
C H C H E
9 7 5
3 0 0
1 0 0
4 6 0
1 0 0
4 6 0
7 0
4 5 0
6 0
3 9 0
2 1 0
3 9 0
2 0 0
3 5 0
1 7 0
2 9 0
1 2 0
2 5 0
8 0
2 4 0
7 0
2 4 0
7 0
3 0 1
C H C H
9 7 5
3 7 0
1 5 0
6 2 0
1 5 0
6 2 0
9 0
5 9 0
8 0
5 0 0
3 3 0
4 9 0
3 0 0
4 5 0
2 5 0
3 7 0
1 8 0
2 8 0
1 0 0
2 7 0
9 0
2 6 0
8 0
3 1 2
E
9 7 5
1 8 0
5 0
2 4 0
5 0
2 4 0
4 0
2 4 0
4 0
2 1 0
1 1 0
2 1 0
1 0 0
2 0 0
9 0
1 7 0
7 0
1 5 0
5 0
1 5 0
5 0
1 5 0
5 0
3 1 1
9 7 5
2 9 0
9 0
4 2 0
9 0
4 2 0
6 0
4 0 0
6 0
3 5 0
2 0 0
3 5 0
1 9 0
3 3 0
1 6 0
2 8 0
1 1 0
2 4 0
8 0
2 3 0
7 0
2 3 0
7 0
3 1 0
E
9 7 5
2 2 0
7 0
3 0 0
7 0
3 0 0
5 0
2 9 0
5 0
2 6 0
1 3 0
2 6 0
1 2 0
2 4 0
1 0 0
2 1 0
8 0
1 9 0
6 0
1 9 0
5 0
1 9 0
5 0
3 0 9
9 7 5
2 0 0
5 0
2 6 0
5 0
2 6 0
4 0
2 5 0
4 0
2 3 0
1 1 0
2 3 0
1 0 0
2 1 0
9 0
1 9 0
7 0
1 7 0
5 0
1 7 0
5 0
1 7 0
5 0
2 6 0
8 5
3 8 3
8 5
3 8 3
5 8
3 7 0
5 5
3 2 3
1 8 2
3 2 2
1 6 8
2 9 7
1 4 3
2 5 2
1 0 5
2 1 3
7 0
2 0 8
6 3
2 0 7
6 2
3 0 8
E
4 7 5
1 2 0
4 0
1 6 0
4 0
1 6 0
3 0
1 5 0
3 0
1 4 0
8 0
1 4 0
7 0
1 3 0
6 0
1 1 0
5 0
1 1 0
4 0
1 1 0
4 0
1 0 0
3 0
3 0 7
4 7 5
1 4 0
4 0
1 9 0
4 0
1 9 0
3 0
1 8 0
3 0
1 6 0
8 0
1 6 0
7 0
1 5 0
7 0
1 4 0
5 0
1 3 0
4 0
1 2 0
4 0
1 2 0
4 0
3 0 6
E
4 7 5
1 7 0
7 0
2 3 0
6 0
2 3 0
5 0
2 2 0
5 0
2 0 0
1 2 0
2 0 0
1 1 0
1 9 0
1 0 0
1 6 0
7 0
1 4 0
6 0
1 4 0
5 0
1 4 0
5 0
3 0 5
4 7 5
2 0 0
8 0
2 8 0
7 0
2 8 0
6 0
2 7 0
6 0
2 4 0
1 4 0
2 4 0
1 3 0
2 2 0
1 2 0
1 9 0
8 0
1 7 0
7 0
1 7 0
6 0
1 6 0
6 0
3 0 4
F
E
4 7 5
8 0
3 0
1 1 0
3 0
1 1 0
3 0
1 1 0
3 0
1 0 0
5 0
1 0 0
5 0
9 0
4 0
8 0
3 0
7 0
3 0
7 0
3 0
7 0
3 0
3 0 3
F
4 7 5
1 1 0
4 0
1 5 0
4 0
1 5 0
3 0
1 4 0
3 0
1 3 0
7 0
1 3 0
7 0
1 1 0
6 0
1 1 0
5 0
1 0 0
4 0
9 0
5 0
9 0
3 0
1 3 7
5 0
1 8 7
4 7
1 8 7
3 8
1 7 8
3 8
1 6 2
9 0
1 6 2
8 3
1 4 8
7 5
1 3 2
5 5
1 2 0
4 7
1 1 7
4 5
1 1 3
4 0
E A A D A C E E ( F A 2 )
1 : 2 4 7 5 E
A
1 : 9 7 5 E
A
1 : 4 7 5 E
A
H
A
B
C
D
E
F
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
18/49
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
19/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
18
T 9 C MSE
FLAC D
A
F
X () () X () () X () () X () () X () ()
315 CHCHE2475 0 0 218 0 218 47 188 14 58 349
314 CHCH2475 0 0 276 10 276 49 226 28 36 563
319 E2475 0 0 118 0 118 32 98 24 28 194
318 2475 0 0 178 20 178 27 138 2 12 489
317 E2475 0 0 132 0 132 28 112 26 52 176
316 2475 0 0 102 0 102 18 92 16 32 146
0 0 171 5 171 34 142 18 32 320
313 CHCHE975 0 0 112 0 112 18 102 16 42 146
301 CHCH975 0 0 130 0 130 30 100 10 10 270
312 E975 0 0 36 0 36 4 36 2 6 78
311 975 0 0 82 0 82 18 62 6 12 146
310 E975 0 0 56 0 56 14 46 8 16 78
309 975 0 0 48 0 48 7 38 4 18 69
0 0 77 0 77 15 64 7 17 131
308 E475 0 0 28 0 28 7 18 4 8 49
307 475 0 0 38 0 38 7 28 4 8 49
306 E475 0 0 36 10 36 14 26 8 6 68
305 475 0 0 44 10 44 11 34 2 4 87
304 FE475 0 0 30 0 30 0 30 0 20 20
303 F475 0 0 28 0 28 7 18 4 8 39
0 0 34 3 34 8 26 4 9 52
A B C D E
E A EA D
1 : 4 7 5 E
A
1 : 2 4 7 5 E
A
1 : 9 7 5 E
A
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
20/49
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
21/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
20
F
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
22/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
21
F 1 T MSE
S = 9
(A REC)
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
23/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
22
F 2 E MSE
( )
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
D E ( )
A , (/)
E
E
A
U :
A D=85%
L :
A D=50%
A
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
24/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
23
F 3 D ,
(O K F G P)
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
25/49
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
26/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
25
W= 875 H=54 66
1D
T F
I
0.41 0.375
1D
T F
F 5 G FLAC
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
27/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
26
F 6 G FLAC
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
28/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
27
F 7 C FLAC
FLAC (Version 6.00)
LEGEND
23-Jun-10 21:45
step 3477
Flow Time 1.7342E+01
Dynamic Time 1.7994E-03
-2.321E+01
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
29/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
28
F 8 P (CHICHINS2475)
T: T
B: T 50
(N R )
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0.000
0.200
0.400
0.600
0.800
1.000
FLAC (Version 6.00)
LEGEND
15-Oct-10 7:09
step 1357899Flow Time 2.3786E+03
Dynamic Time 5.0503E+01 -7.036E+01
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
30/49
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
31/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
30
FLAC (Version 6.00)
LEGEND
14-Oct-10 18:41
step 1910521
Flow Time 2.4131E+03
Dynamic Time 8.5006E+01
-2.768E+01
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
32/49
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
33/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
32
F 12 L T 6
( )
F A2
A
B C D F
12.0
3.0
6.0
9.0
12.0
A T W
B T W F
C K @ 3 27
12 H D
15.0
18.0
21.0
24.0
H E
27.0
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
34/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
33
F 13 T
CHICHINS2475
(S F 12 P A, B E)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
-1.000
-0.800
-0.600
-0.400
-0.200
0.000
H
B FLAC (I M)
H B (P A)
H
T MSE (P B)
V
S MSE (P E)
T ()
D ()
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
35/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
34
F 14 T MSE (5 CHICHINS2475)
U S
R M
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
36/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
35
F 15 S MSE
D MSE (5 )
A
MSE
L T
= 0.017 + 19.48R = 0.949
19.70
19.75
19.80
19.85
19.90
19.95
20.00
19 21 23 25 27 29
( )
()
T
=0.017
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
37/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
36
F 16 A I MSE
(N.T.S D )
E
A HAE
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
38/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
37
( )
FLAC (Version 6.00)
LEGEND
14-Oct-10 19:32
step 1910521
Flow Time 2.4131E+03
Dynamic Time 8.5006E+01
1.783E+01
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
39/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
38
( )
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
-8.000
-7.000
-6.000
-5.000
-4.000
-3.000
(10 )04
Row #2
Row #10
Row #6
Row #4
Strip Axial Load(x10 kN/m)
Time (sec)
CHICHI-NS-2475
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
40/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
39
FLAC (Version 6.00)
LEGEND
14-Oct-10 19:33
step 1910521Flow Time 2.4131E+03
Dynamic Time 8.5006E+01
1.783E+01
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
41/49
DAC AA F A 12 HH EC A ED F D AEAAD EECHCA D CBE 20, 2010
40
H
S SHAKE
G ()
F A1SHAKE C
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
42/49
C 1 HGH C G G GCHC C , 1
41
F A2 A
CHCHINS2475.
( )
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
43/49
C 1 HGH C G G GCHC C , 1
42
Appendix B
C C &
UBCSAND
UBCSAND is an elastic-plastic effective stress model with the mechanical behaviour of the sand skeleton
and pore water flow fully coupled (Beaty & Byrne 1998; Byrne et al. 2004). The model includes a yield
surface related to the developed friction angle, non-associative flow rule, and definitions for loading,
unloading, and hardening. Elastic properties are isotropic and nonlinear and yield loci are radial lines of
constant stress ratio from the origin in stress space. Increase in stress ratio is “loading” which is elastic-
plastic. Unloading is elastic. When the stress ratio is below the constant volume friction angle (cv) the
soil skeleton is contractive (when sheared) while above cv the soil is dilative (Figure B1). A hyperbolicrelationship is used between stress ratio and plastic shear strain (Figure B2). The yield envelope
(maximum developed stress ratio) is pushed out (hardened) according to a function between plastic shear
modulus and plastic shear strain increment. Unloading and reloading is elastic, however, when the stress-
ratio goes to zero and there is a cross-over (loading on the other side) the yield envelope is reset at zero
and must be hardened again according the function between plastic shear modulus and plastic shear strain
increment. The model is set-up to run as a separate constitutive model within the program FLAC (Itasca
2008). A small Raleigh damping (typically 1%) is used with the UBCSAND model to provide numerical
stability at small strain and damping. Key soil properties used are the small strain shear modulus (Gmax),
(N1)60-CS or relative density of the soil and constant volume friction angle (typically 33 degrees for quartz
based sands). Typically, Gmax is obtained from either in-situ shear wave velocity measurements or from
correlations with (N1)60 as follows:
Gmax = ρ Vs2 or Gmax = 21.7*20*((N1)60)
0.333*Pa*(σm'/Pa)0.5 (Equation B1)
where: ρ = moist or saturated soil density
Vs = shear wave velocity
Pa = atmospheric pressure and
σm' = mean normal effective confining pressure
(N1)60-CS = Fines corrected (equivalent coarse sand) normalized standard
penetration test N-value (blows/foot)
From Gmax and (N1)60 the program determines elastic and plastic moduli, and peak friction angle.
UBCSAND Calibration
Three or four calibration parameters (depending on the version used) are in the model. In the calibration
process, a single undrained soil element is exercised so as to trigger liquefaction in the correct number of
cycles and to give post-liquefaction stress-strain behaviour consistent with that observed in laboratory
simple shear tests. The calibration procedure used is as follows:
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
44/49
C 1 HGH C G G GCHC C , 1
43
1. Set up the 2D FLAC profile with a Mohr Coulomb constitutive model and bring it to static
equilibrium. Representative cohesionless soil elements are then selected for calibration. The
vertical and horizontal effective confining pressure, small strain shear modulus, and (N1)60-CS are
recorded for each element to be calibrated.
2. An undrained single element model is set up in FLAC and is initialized with the representative
vertical and horizontal effective confining pressure, small strain shear modulus, and (N1)60-CS.
3. A cyclic shear stress (τxy) compatible with a cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) that will liquefy (pore
pressure ratio near 1.0) in 15 cycles (CRR15) from Idriss and Boulanger, 2008 empirical
liquefaction triggering chart and equation is calculated as follows:
τxy = σvo' * CRR15 * k σ (Equation B2)
where τxy = applied cyclic shear stress
σvo' = vertical effective stress
CRR15 = cyclic resistance ratiokσ = confinement correction ≤ 1.0
4. The single element is then repeatedly cyclically loaded with the τxy from step (3) and calibration
parameters are adjusted until the element liquefies in 15 cycles and the post-liquefaction stress-
strain cycles are compatible with typical laboratory tests (used tests data by Sriskandakumar,
2004). Liquefaction is assumed to occur when the pore pressure ratio (Ru).
The calibration parameters are introduced as material parameters in the larger 2D model. Theseparameters are either fixed within zones that have similar stresses, Gmax and (N1)60, or are set as afunction of confining stress and/or (N1)60. Calibration parameters (m_hfac1 to 4) that were used are inTable 2a of the main report.
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
45/49
C 1 HGH C G G GCHC C , 1
44
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
46/49
C 1 HGH C G G GCHC C , 1
45
References on UBCSAND
Beaty, M., and Byrne, P.M. 1998. An effective stress model for predicting liquefaction behaviour of sand,Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III. P. Dakou-las, M. Yegian, and R Holtz(eds.), ASCE, Geotechnical Special Publication 75 (1), pp. 766-777.
Byrne, P.M., Park, S.S., Beaty, M., Sharp, M.K., Gonzalez, L., & Abdoun, T. 2004. “Numerical modelingof liquefac-tion and comparison with centrifuge tests,” Canadian Geot. J., V. 41(2):193-211.
Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W., 2008. “Soil liquefaction during earthquakes”, Earthquake EngineeringResearch Institute, MNO-12.
ITASCA, 2008. “FLAC Version 6.0 Fast Langrangian Analysis of Continua User’s Manuals”, ItascaConsulting Group Inc., Minneapolis Minnesota.
Kokusho, T., 1999. “Water film in liquefied sand and its effect on lateral spread,” J. Geo-technical andGeoenviron. Eng. 125(10), pp. 817- 826.
Naesgaard, E., Yang, D., Byrne, P.M., and Gohl, B., 2004. “Numerical analyses for the seismic safetyretrofit design of the immersed-tube George Massey tunnel,” 13th World Conference on EarthquakeEngineering, Vancouver, August.
Naesgaard, E., Byrne, P.M., Seid-Karbasi, M., and Park, S.S., 2005. “Modelling flow liquefaction, itsmitigation and comparison with centrifuge tests,” Proc. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering SatelliteConf., Osaka, Sept. 10, TC4 committee ISSMGE, Publ. by Japanese Geotechncial Society, pp. 95-102.
Naesgaard, E., Byrne, P.M., and Seid-Karbasi, M., 2006. “Modelling flow liquefaction and pore waterredistribution mechanisms,” Proc. 8th National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, April.
Naesgaard, E. and Byrne, P.M., 2007. “Flow liquefaction simulation using a combined effective stress -total stress model,” 60th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Canadian Geotechnical Society, Ottawa,Ontario, October.
Sriskandakumar, S., 2004. “Cyclic loading response of Fraser River Sand for validation of numericalmodels simulating centrifuge tests”, M.A.Sc. Thesis, Dept. Civil Engineering, University of BritishColumbia, March.
Yang., D., Naesgaard, E., Byrne, P.M., Adalier, K., and Abdoun, T., 2005. “Numerical Model verificationand calibration of George Massey Tunnel using centrifuge models” Canadian Geot. Journal, Vol. 41,No. 5, April.
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
47/49
C 1 HGH C G G GCHC C , 1
46
Appendix C
BCH C D & C
UBCHYST
n
f f
t RGG
⋅−⋅= η
η 1max 1
Where
Gt= tangent shear modulus
η = developed stress ratio = (τxy / σ'v)
η1= η - ηmax = η
ηmax = η
η1f = ηf - ηmax = η
ηf = (sin(Øf ) + C * cos(Øf )/ σ'v)
τxy =
σ'v =
Øf = R =
UBCHYST Calibration
The UBCHYST model was calibrated to uniform cyclic response inferred from published modulus
reduction and damping curves. The UBCHYST calibration parameters used for all the analyses are in
Table 2a of the main body of the report. Figure C-2 shows an example of curve fitting procedure.
.
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
48/49
C 1 HGH C G G GCHC C , 1
47
F C1 UBCHST C M
8/15/2019 Analisis Dinamico Tem Flac
49/49
C 1 HGH C G G GCHC C , 1
UBCHYST
Seed & Idriss (1970)Upper & Lower bounds
Recommended