Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BDTD – Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações
ETD2012
Ana Pavani Member IEEE
Laboratório de Automação de Museus, Bibliotecas Digitais e Arquivos
Departamento de Engenharia ElétricaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
[email protected] http://www.maxwell.lambda.ele.puc-rio.br/
Lima, Peru – Sep 13, 2012
12 years of ETDs in Brasil 2001 - 2012
BDTD
BRAZIL
Population: 195.5 million (UNDP Report 2010)Language: Portuguese
North:
7.95% pop45.25% area
North East:
7.95% pop45.25% area
Center West:
5.85% pop18.8% area
South:
14.53% pop6.77% area
South East:
42.33% pop10.86% area
Fed Distric:
1.33% pop0.07% area
LITERACY MAP IN 2000
Why 2000?
Because the first meeting to establish BDTD, the Brazilian National ETD
Consortium, was held in January 2001.
What can we see in the maps?
(1) Brazil is very big. (2) Brazilian regions are very different in
terms of areas and of populations;(3) They are also very different in terms
of educational levels.
Why is this important?
It helps understand the beginning of BDTD and it shows how BDTD was
important in terms of disseminating ETDs, digital publishing, IPR issues,
etc.
ETDs IN BRAZIL
Before 2001
UFSC – Univ Federal de
Santa Catarina USP –
Universidade de São Paulo
PUC-Rio – Pontifícia
Universidade Católica do
Rio de Janeiro
2001 & 2002
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações (http://bdtd.ibict.br/) Created and run by IBICT – Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência
e Tecnologia (http://www.ibict.br/)
Main events:
Definition of a metadata set and a XML schema
First union catalog (Dec 2001)
Choice of the OAI-PMH – Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (http://www.openarchives.org/) to gather metadata
Choice of the OAI-PMH – Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (http://www.openarchives.org/) to gather metadata
First union catalog using OAI-PMH (Dec 2002) – there were two additional institutions and between 1,700 and 2,000 metadata records
Development of the TEDE system for free and open distribution
Implementation of a training program
December 2004
Number of ETD programs:
10
Number of ETDs:
5,394
Nordeste:
18.18% proj0.463% ETDs
Sul:
18.18% proj35.206% ETDs
Sudeste:
45.46% proj63.144% ETDs
Distrito Fed:
18.18% proj1.187% ETDs
In two years:
(1) Number of ETD programs: 3 10;(2) Number of ETDs: 2,000 5,500;
(3) Number of regions: 2 4.
September 2012
Number of ETD programs:
96
Number of ETDs:
200,216
North:
6.1% proj0.6% ETDs
North East:
19.4% proj12.8% ETDs
Center West:
5.1% proj2.1% ETDs
South:
21.4% proj18.3% ETDs
South East:
44.9% proj62.6% ETDs
Fed District:
3.1% proj3.6% ETDs
Dec 2004 Sep 2012 % GrowthPrograms 10 96 960.00ETDs 5,394 200,216 3,711.83
There are ETD programs in all regions!!
Some characteristics of BDTD:
10% of the members hold 66.95% of the collection
The top 3 institutions hold 44.71% of the collection
The top 2 institutions have more than 30K ETDs
18.75% of the institutions have less than 100 ETDs
1-100 101-500 501-1000 1001-2000 2001-10000 10001-40000
Tot0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Some benefits BDTD brought:
The culture of ‘digital libraries’ was spread all over the (huge) country
Topics in IPR, restrictions and Open Access were addressed
The offer of references to researchers and
graduate students increased
Brazilian T&D became more visible
A metadata set for Brazilian ETDs was created
Brazilian institutions matured and became ready to introduce IR – Institutional Repositories and go beyond ETD (make available scholarly communications in general)
SOME ISSUES
Current
Poor quality of metadata Institutions whose collections grow at a
very slow pace
Digital preservation
Lack of a common set of statistic to allow comparisons among collections
Commitment from institutions to keep programs and services
Near future
Review of metadata model – is under discussion at the moment
Migration from TEDE to DSpace – some institutions
Repositories with multilingual interfaces
ETD CONSORTIAPavani & Southwick (ETD2004)
Goal & Requirements
Goal:
To create a collaborative environment to promote interoperability and increase the availability of ETDs on networked digital libraries
Requirements: Partnership
Participation
Objectives
Help each other start and maintain ETD programs
Share experiences and SW solutions
Find new ways of enhancing programs and ETDs themselves
Discuss and create standards to allow interoperability
Create union catalogs of metadata records
Elements
ETDs!!!! Coordination
Cooperation
Integration
Questions to Answer
Is it worthed to build a consortium? What are the benefits you expect from a
consortium?
Would you help build a consortium?
Would your institution join a consortium? Why? Why not?
THANK YOU! ¡MUCHAS GRACIAS! OBRIGADA!
Maps in slides 5 and 6 are colored versions of a mapa-mundi from
IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística
http://www.ibge.gov.br/
