Doença+cistica+adquirida

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Doena+cistica+adquirida

    1/2

    5. Wong G, et al.: Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women ondialysis. Am J Kidney Dis52:916929,2008

    6. LeBrun CL, et al.: Life expectancy benefits of cancer screening in theend-stagerenal diseasepopulation. Am J Kidney Dis 35:237243, 2000

    7. Cohen LM, et al.: Predicting six-month mortality for patients who are onmaintenancehemodialysis. ClinJ Am SocNephrol5:7279, 2010

    Should screening for acquired cysticdisease and renal malignancy beundertaken in dialysis patients?

    Swathi SinganamalaandUrsula C. Brewster

    Acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD) is a commonand worrisome complication of end-stage renal disease(ESRD) and was first described in 1977. Diagnostic cri-teria consist of the presence of four or more cysts in eachkidney without a family history of cystic kidney disease.Patients with severe disease can have more than ninecysts in each kidney and cysts larger than 5 cm with little

    remaining non-cystic renal parenchyma. ACKD is usu-ally asymptomatic but can be complicated by pain,spontaneous hemorrhage and renal cell carcinoma(RCC). Spontaneous hemorrhage, exacerbated by hepa-rin use and platelet dysfunction, can be severe and causesudden hypotension during hemodialysis (1).

    Prevalence of ACKD is primarily a function of timeon dialysis; however up to 10% of patients withadvanced CKD not yet on dialysis have ACKD. After3 years on dialysis nearly half of ESRD patients haveACKD, and this number increases to 90-100% at10 years (2). The etiology of ESRD does not seem toinfluence the occurrence of ACKD, although there is

    slight preponderance in older men and there is no majorracial difference (2,3). Dialysis duration is the only factorthat affects the severity of ACKD. Age, dialysis ade-quacy, residual renal function does not appear to affectthe severity of cystic disease (4). Although some report alower risk in patients on peritoneal dialysis, this is notconsistent across the literature (5).

    Renal cell carcinoma is a well-recognized complica-tion of ACKD. The incidence of RCC in ESRDpatients is 14% (6,7). It is predominantly unilateralbut may be bilateral in 2530% of cases (8,9). Twomajor histological types have been described: clear celland papillary type. Although papillary RCC is morecommon in ESRD patients than in the general popula-

    tion (30% versus 1015% respectively), clear cell is themost common type (5,9). Because of the increased riskof RCC in patients with ACKD, the overall prevalenceof RCC is about 3035 fold higher in dialysis patientscompared to general population.(5). RCC is accompa-nied by ACKD in about 7580% of the cases (7,8).Cysts >3 cm in diameter have a higher risk of malig-nancy (3). Duration on dialysis is again the most impor-tant risk factor for the development of malignancy

    (8,10). The published mortality for patients undergoingradical nephrectomy for RCC without metastasisranges from 0.5 to 6% and is up to 10% with meta-static disease (11).

    Screening for ACKD might make sense intellectually,but its cost effectiveness in the ESRD population, withits associated comorbidities, must be carefully consid-

    ered. It is important to remember that the median age ofpatients starting dialysis is increasing and the USRDSdata cites median 5 year survival of incident ESRDpatient as only 38%.

    Decision analysis has been used to evaluate the bene-fits of screening by performing either ultrasound (US)or computed tomography (CT) every 3 years and thenannually in patients with ACKD in a recent study (12).Baseline analysis showed that both CT and USdecrease the cancer deaths by half for those ESRDpatients with a life expectancy of 25 years or more.Screening in these patients increased life expectancy by1.6 years (12). However, a 25 year life expectancy is

    uncommon in the average dialysis unit. Another studyused mathematical modeling to show a 35% reductionin risk of death, with survival benefit of 3.3 years, fromall causes after adjustment for age, duration of dialysisand other comorbid illnesses with a screening by CT orUS (11).

    We cannot extrapolate these data to all patients, asmost 64 year-old dialysis patients do not have 25-yearlife expectancy. Add to that, the 5 year survival of anESRD patient with RCC stage 1 is 35%, which is similarto an ESRD patient without RCC. ESRD patients withRCC are more likely to die of cardiovascular diseaserather than the RCC (2). The largest beneficial effect inboth the studies was seen in young patients who might

    be future transplant recipients.How about transplant patients? A recent review of

    1000 transplant recipients followed for 28 years showedthat ACKD is less common in transplant recipientscompared to ESRD patients as a whole (23% versus80%), but the prevalence of RCC was higher (19% ver-sus 0.5%) in recipients with than without ACKD (13).The Bosniak scoring system (Table 1) categorizes cysticlesions, and is recommended as an excellent tool forrisk stratification in patients. Most recommend yearlyultrasound screening after transplant for all irrespectiveof ACKD (13). Once ACKD develops, ultrasoundshould be done more frequently; every 6 months for

    Seminars in DialysisVol 24, No 4 (JulyAugust) 2011pp. 365366DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.00908.x 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

    SCREENING FOR ACQUIRED CYSTIC DISEASE AND RENAL MALIGNANCY 365

  • 7/31/2019 Doena+cistica+adquirida

    2/2

    Bosniak 1 and 2, quarterly for 2F and 3. Nephrectomyshould be considered anytime lesions are progressing.Although there are no strict guidelines, an arbitrary2-year period after nephrectomy for RCC has beenrecommended to ensure non-recurrence to relist fortransplant.

    The optimal imaging modality for screening is notclear as the data are mixed. CT scan is likely superior toultrasound in detecting focal hyperplasia and small solidlesions